IF my neighbor actually went to the polls instead of saying to hell with it. If he or she didn't get the ballot they requested, they just won't vote that election.Your neighbor would know when they went to vote and their vote had already been counted.
Lots of ifs. Certainly if this was a widespread problem, we’d know about it.IF my neighbor actually went to the polls instead of saying to hell with it. If he or she didn't get the ballot they requested
Gotcha. But you seem to “know” what happens there. How’d that happen?I never claimed I did,, that was you now prove it,,
Most of Europe doesn't view it that way. A lot of the EU hasn't allowed mail-in voting for a long time now, and none of the major elections in Europe over the last year have allowed widespread mail-in voting. Some EU countries have banned it altogether, while others only have an absentee system that you have to register beforehand for.It’s a pandemic, dude. Vote by mail was smarter.With the exception of a tiny percentage of the population with extreme situations, such as soldiers in the field during election time or a few other edge cases, people can vote in person with a free voter ID.
No, because everybody knew mail-in could be rife with fraud, including all of us on the right here on USMB. We've said it repeatedly.Everyone was pushing for more mail in voting, until Trump decided that he needed a scapegoat for his impending loss.
how can you got me when I never claimed I was in one,,Gotcha. But you seem to “know” what happens there. How’d that happen?I never claimed I did,, that was you now prove it,,
We would? How?Lots of ifs. Certainly if this was a widespread problem, we’d know about it.
Yes, but you know how Democrats are, only listen to the science when it agrees with your views.Even Fauci said that in-person voting was safe as long as certain precautions were taken.
Because as I said, if it was happening on a large scale, we’d have thousands and thousands of voters who would have found out their ballots had already been cast.We would? How?Lots of ifs. Certainly if this was a widespread problem, we’d know about it.
What we do know for certain is that if somebody goes to the polls, and has to present an acceptable identification to vote, without a doubt we know that vote was cast by the intended voter.
To be fair, both parties are guilty of this sort of thing, although I would say that science itself isn't infallible.Yes, but you know how Democrats are, only listen to the science when it agrees with your views.Even Fauci said that in-person voting was safe as long as certain precautions were taken.
Because you claimed to know what happens there.how can you got me when I never claimed I was in one,,
Like I said, if they went to the polls after not receiving their ballots. How many just said to hell with it and never knew their ballot was cast? It's not like how people voted is on an internet site where you could look it up.Because as I said, if it was happening on a large scale, we’d have thousands and thousands of voters who would have found out their ballots had already been cast.
they take care of sick people,, are you saying thats not what happens??Because you claimed to know what happens there.how can you got me when I never claimed I was in one,,
Id love to know how that came to be?
Clairvoyance perhaps?
And you think the percentage of people who said “to hell with it” is what?Like I said, if they went to the polls after not receiving their ballots. How many just said to hell with it and never knew their ballot was cast? It's not like how people voted is on an internet site where you could look it up.Because as I said, if it was happening on a large scale, we’d have thousands and thousands of voters who would have found out their ballots had already been cast.
We will never know. What we do know is that voting in person reduces that possibility tenfold.And you think the percentage of people who said “to hell with it” is what?
It is indeed what happens. But that’s not all you claimed, obviously.they take care of sick people,, are you saying thats not what happens??
Do you think it’s 100%?We will never know. What we do know is that voting in person reduces that possibility tenfold.And you think the percentage of people who said “to hell with it” is what?
what did I claim other than they are treating sick people??It is indeed what happens. But that’s not all you claimed, obviously.they take care of sick people,, are you saying thats not what happens??
Seems you’re no longer interested in your baseless accusations. Just admit you’re fabricating it and we will move on.
Don’t worry about it. You’re too disconnected from reality to even acknowledge what you said a few hours ago.what did I claim other than they are treating sick people??
If it was 20%, it could change an entire election given the mass amounts of mail-in last year.Do you think it’s 100%?
