Dogmaphobe
Diamond Member
Then we just keep going.
.
Speaking of keep going, you might like this. Susan Moller Okin was a true liberal feminist, and the world lost a clear voice when she died.
Susan Moller Okin: Is Multiculturalism Bad for Women?
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Then we just keep going.
.
Then we just keep going.
.
Speaking of keep going, you might like this. Susan Moller Okin was a true liberal feminist, and the world lost a clear voice when she died.
Susan Moller Okin: Is Multiculturalism Bad for Women?
Dogmaphobe, are you an American citizen? I think I remember you are.
So why are you so worried about hijabs in foreign countries when our President is currently upholding domestic abusers on his staff with all deference and sympathy? In my state, over half the homicides are domestic violence. It's a real thing happening in this country in real time that truly harms any woman that comes in contact with it.
So why are you so focused on Muslim women's head coverings in other countries?
You chose the term "obsessed," not me. No one said he couldn't have a discussion about it, either. Now I await an answer to my question.Dogmaphobe, are you an American citizen? I think I remember you are.
So why are you so worried about hijabs in foreign countries when our President is currently upholding domestic abusers on his staff with all deference and sympathy? In my state, over half the homicides are domestic violence. It's a real thing happening in this country in real time that truly harms any woman that comes in contact with it.
So why are you so focused on Muslim women's head coverings in other countries?
its a free country------I have not noticed that DOG is "obsessed" over anything in particular. We are all
engaged in fairly casual discussion. I had an IMPASSIONED conversation just a few minutes ago
about my poorly functioning dishwasher--------NOT A COSMIC ISSUE
You chose the term "obsessed," not me. No one said he couldn't have a discussion about it, either. Now I await an answer to my question.Dogmaphobe, are you an American citizen? I think I remember you are.
So why are you so worried about hijabs in foreign countries when our President is currently upholding domestic abusers on his staff with all deference and sympathy? In my state, over half the homicides are domestic violence. It's a real thing happening in this country in real time that truly harms any woman that comes in contact with it.
So why are you so focused on Muslim women's head coverings in other countries?
its a free country------I have not noticed that DOG is "obsessed" over anything in particular. We are all
engaged in fairly casual discussion. I had an IMPASSIONED conversation just a few minutes ago
about my poorly functioning dishwasher--------NOT A COSMIC ISSUE
Dogmaphobe, are you an American citizen? I think I remember you are.
So why are you so worried about hijabs in foreign countries when our President is currently upholding domestic abusers on his staff with all deference and sympathy? In my state, over half the homicides are domestic violence. It's a real thing happening in this country in real time that truly harms any woman that comes in contact with it.
So why are you so focused on Muslim women's head coverings in other countries?
Since the topic is Feminism vs Islam, I would like to ask why you disparage a brave women like Ayaan Hirsi Ali, who places her life on the line for human rights.It is however and until now it has been a contentious but highly civil conversation.Guys this is CDZ, get back on topic which is essentially in whether hijab is oppression. No insults. No put downs.
this thread should not be in CDZ--------the question, itself, precludes a CDZ discussion.
you are naïve------the QUESTION----is an attack on DIVINE SHARIAH LAW. ----an attack on "allah"
That is not the topic however.
I don't disagree that human rights are human rights, whatever they might be.Dogmaphobe, are you an American citizen? I think I remember you are.
So why are you so worried about hijabs in foreign countries when our President is currently upholding domestic abusers on his staff with all deference and sympathy? In my state, over half the homicides are domestic violence. It's a real thing happening in this country in real time that truly harms any woman that comes in contact with it.
So why are you so focused on Muslim women's head coverings in other countries?
I believe in human rights, Oldlady.
Why don't you?
Just because the radical leftists here don't care what happens to women born under the oppressive yoke of Islam doesn't mean I am just like them in turning a blind eye. I do not support Trump, nor the systems of domestic abuse.
In a world where one woman faces disfigurement lest she disobey her Islamic owner and another women faces pressure to have sex with her boss, unlike you radical leftists, I see a DEGREE of difference involved.
You people focus your attention on the Tom cat peeing in your petunias and ignore the saber tooth tiger with your toddler in its jaws. I possess more of what psychologists call executive function, so see the tiger as the more pressing concern.
Domestic violence in this country is a terrible thing and a real problem.I don't disagree that human rights are human rights, whatever they might be.Dogmaphobe, are you an American citizen? I think I remember you are.
So why are you so worried about hijabs in foreign countries when our President is currently upholding domestic abusers on his staff with all deference and sympathy? In my state, over half the homicides are domestic violence. It's a real thing happening in this country in real time that truly harms any woman that comes in contact with it.
So why are you so focused on Muslim women's head coverings in other countries?
I believe in human rights, Oldlady.
Why don't you?
Just because the radical leftists here don't care what happens to women born under the oppressive yoke of Islam doesn't mean I am just like them in turning a blind eye. I do not support Trump, nor the systems of domestic abuse.
In a world where one woman faces disfigurement lest she disobey her Islamic owner and another women faces pressure to have sex with her boss, unlike you radical leftists, I see a DEGREE of difference involved.
You people focus your attention on the Tom cat peeing in your petunias and ignore the saber tooth tiger with your toddler in its jaws. I possess more of what psychologists call executive function, so see the tiger as the more pressing concern.
I don't know if hijabs are a more pressing concern than domestic violence in our own country, though. DV kills American women. DV is still ignored/dismissed in our own country by very influential men. So I'm not sure which I believe is the "tiger" at this point.
Btw, another women faces pressure to have sex with her boss,
This is not domestic violence. It is sexual harassment.
Since the topic is Feminism vs Islam, I would like to ask why you disparage a brave women like Ayaan Hirsi Ali, who places her life on the line for human rights.It is however and until now it has been a contentious but highly civil conversation.Guys this is CDZ, get back on topic which is essentially in whether hijab is oppression. No insults. No put downs.
this thread should not be in CDZ--------the question, itself, precludes a CDZ discussion.
you are naïve------the QUESTION----is an attack on DIVINE SHARIAH LAW. ----an attack on "allah"
That is not the topic however.
You indicated that you only support women who remain Islamic rather than those who reject Islam. By indicating such, you place yourself in alignment with Islamic views towards apostasy and against freedom of belief.
Why do you require a women born under the yoke of Islam to remain a Muslim? Why don't you support the liberal value of freedom of belief, instead? One of the worst aspects of Islam is that it is something one is born in to and cannot possibly escape without placing one's life in danger. All those blasphemy and apostasy laws in Islamic countries make this so.
As was the case with slavery in the 19th century, there is an entire system that needs to be addressed, and you and others are entirely unwilling to address the system.
You essentially did just that by marginalizing it in the Amish community.Domestic violence in this country is a terrible thing and a real problem.I don't disagree that human rights are human rights, whatever they might be.Dogmaphobe, are you an American citizen? I think I remember you are.
So why are you so worried about hijabs in foreign countries when our President is currently upholding domestic abusers on his staff with all deference and sympathy? In my state, over half the homicides are domestic violence. It's a real thing happening in this country in real time that truly harms any woman that comes in contact with it.
So why are you so focused on Muslim women's head coverings in other countries?
I believe in human rights, Oldlady.
Why don't you?
Just because the radical leftists here don't care what happens to women born under the oppressive yoke of Islam doesn't mean I am just like them in turning a blind eye. I do not support Trump, nor the systems of domestic abuse.
In a world where one woman faces disfigurement lest she disobey her Islamic owner and another women faces pressure to have sex with her boss, unlike you radical leftists, I see a DEGREE of difference involved.
You people focus your attention on the Tom cat peeing in your petunias and ignore the saber tooth tiger with your toddler in its jaws. I possess more of what psychologists call executive function, so see the tiger as the more pressing concern.
I don't know if hijabs are a more pressing concern than domestic violence in our own country, though. DV kills American women. DV is still ignored/dismissed in our own country by very influential men. So I'm not sure which I believe is the "tiger" at this point.
Btw, another women faces pressure to have sex with her boss,
This is not domestic violence. It is sexual harassment.
That is why you sure won't find me defending it by saying "well, such and such do it too"
There is plenty of evidence for both. His very livelihood involved murder and theft, and he even ordered his followers to rape women in front of their husbands and then kill the men.
Your being so utterly ignorant does not make truth an expression of "Islamophobia"
There is plenty of evidence for both. His very livelihood involved murder and theft, and he even ordered his followers to rape women in front of their husbands and then kill the men.
Your being so utterly ignorant does not make truth an expression of "Islamophobia"
Again, do you have a source for this?
Abu Dawud 2150There is plenty of evidence for both. His very livelihood involved murder and theft, and he even ordered his followers to rape women in front of their husbands and then kill the men.
Your being so utterly ignorant does not make truth an expression of "Islamophobia"
Again, do you have a source for this?