Why Do Trump Supporters Have Such A Hard Time Admitting He's A Convicted Felon?

[Mick2]

fined him for what exactly?

No one knows. The number was made up in a left-wing banana court. The appellate court unanimously vacated it on appeal.

The fine now: $0.00

 

[Mick2]

not misdemeanors. fel-o-nies.

34 felonies.

There are a total of five felony classes: Class A felony, Class B felony, Class C felony, Class D felony, and Class E felony, with A being the most serious (potentially leading to life imprisonment) and E being the least. However, this does not mean that a Class E felony charge should be taken at all lightly – New York State penal code describes a Class E felony as ‘an offense for which a sentence to a term of imprisonment in excess of one year may be imposed’.
What is a New York Class E Felony?

Class “E” felonies are the least serious felonies. However, they are still felonies, still need to be taken seriously and can result in a prison sentence of up to 4 years in state prison. However, there are no minimums for first time felony offenders and a person convicted of a class “E” felony can even receive a sentence of probation or a conditional discharge. Most class “E” felonies are non-violent. The only violent class “E” felonies are attempts to commit violent class “D” felonies such as Attempted Assault in the Second Degree or Attempted Criminal Possession of a Weapon in the Third Degree. N0n-violent class “E” felonies can run the gamut from Criminally Negligent Homicide, Grand Larceny in the Fourth Degree or Criminal Mischief in the Third Degree. A person who is a predicate felon is required to go to prison even on a “E” felony.
D.A. Bragg Announces 34-Count Felony Trial Conviction of Donald J. Trump

Meaningless. Trump's Constitutional rights were repeatedly violated in that case as legal experts have shown time and time again. The conviction will be tossed on appeal.

 

[dudmuck]

OMG!
34 misdemeanors beyond the statute of limitations.
Like 34 jaywalking tickets, one for each step it takes to cross the street.

Under New York Penal Law § 175.10, falsifying business records is normally a misdemeanor, but it is elevated to a Class E felony when the false entries are made to conceal or commit another crime.

also the statute of limitations is extended when the false entries are made to conceal or commit another crime

Trump mounted an aggressive, years-long legal effort during his first term to block New York prosecutors and congressional committees from accessing his tax returns and business records. However, he did not permanently block the records; after multiple appeals, the U.S. Supreme Court ruled in July 2020 that he was not immune to state grand jury subpoenas

 

[jc456]

He pled guilty to several charges. One was making an illegal campaign contribution.

Made up. Part of the hoax

 

[candycorn]

Under New York Penal Law § 175.10, falsifying business records is normally a misdemeanor, but it is elevated to a Class E felony when the false entries are made to conceal or commit another crime.

also the statute of limitations is extended when the false entries are made to conceal or commit another crime

Trump mounted an aggressive, years-long legal effort during his first term to block New York prosecutors and congressional committees from accessing his tax returns and business records. However, he did not permanently block the records; after multiple appeals, the U.S. Supreme Court ruled in July 2020 that he was not immune to state grand jury subpoenas

34X convicted felon.

 

[jc456]

You're right, I got the wrong acronym. It's FECA. Still, the "F" stands for "federal."

Whoopti do

 

[Political-Junkie]

It's called the "irrespective test"

Personal use - FEC.gov

Using campaign funds for personal use is prohibited. FEC guidance on which expenses are considered to be personal use and which expenses are considered on a case-by-case basis, including charitable donations, gifts, candidate salary, meals, vehicles, travel and legal expenses

www.fec.gov

Thank you for posting that, but I don't see how it's relevant. It says "Under the "irrespective test," personal use is any use of funds in a campaign account of a candidate." There was no personal use of funds from a campaign account. Cohen used funds from a bank loan and Trump reimbursed him using a combination of personal funds and business funds.

 

[Political-Junkie]

Federal Employees' Compensation Act?

Federal Election Campaign Act

 

[candycorn]

You defend a criminal.

We are not the same.

Very well put. Except I’d say “You defend a 34X convicted felon”.

 

[playtime]

No one knows. The number was made up in a left-wing banana court. The appellate court unanimously vacated it on appeal.

The fine now: $0.00

then you can find a link to back it up.

 

[playtime]

Meaningless. Trump's Constitutional rights were repeatedly violated in that case as legal experts have shown time and time again. The conviction will be tossed on appeal.

 

[Political-Junkie]

And the last speeding ticket I got, I pleaded it down to "Parking on the Parkway." That's not evidence I ever parked on the parkway.

Cohen didn't plead the charge down. He was indicted on a campaign finance violation, pled guilty to that campaign finance violation, and convicted on that campaign finance violation.

 

[Mick2]

Cohen didn't plead the charge down. He was indicted on a campaign finance violation, pled guilty to that campaign finance violation, and convicted on that campaign finance violation.

The Department of Justice and the FEC never accused Trump of any wrongdoing under the act. They terminated the investigation in 2021. This is where your roadblock happens.

 

[Mick2]

then you can find a link to back it up.

It drew headlines when the Applellate court threw the fine out. This is already established
It's you, not I, that needs a link.

 

[Mick2]

View attachment 1258695

Brother Clarence wants you to hold his beer

 

[playtime]

It drew headlines when the Applellate court threw the fine out. This is already established

you heard, read, saw it somewhere. shirley you can get a credible unbiased likn to that .... riiiight?

It's you, not I, that needs a link.

you claimed it - you back it up.

 

[Mick2]

Very well put. Except I’d say “You defend a 34X convicted felon”.

No, we defend a 34x time wrongly convicted person who is also our President. Does that make you angry?

 

[playtime]

Brother Clarence wants you to hold his beer

who? i know an uncle clarence - he's part of the supremes.... but no brother clarence.

 

[Mick2]

you claimed it - you back it up.

There is no claim on my part. It happened. It's known. This is akin to you asking for proof on whether the North or South won the Civil War. The shit you have for brains just makes us laugh.

 

[Mick2]

who?

One reasoned guess. Ready......set....go...!