Why Do Trump Supporters Have Such A Hard Time Admitting He's A Convicted Felon?

[Delldude]

As the mens Rae, criminal intent, motivation for v the criminal acts.

Men’s Rae is one of the elements of a crime they must show.

WW

And they didn't.

So what?

Ha ha ha.

Loss for words?

 

[Political-Junkie]

Would you like to be blatantly lied about if you were a major public figure?

Many women have made claims against Trump about sexual assault and even rape. How did it hurt him?

 

[Toddsterpatriot]

Yes v he did.

He’s a federal felon for campaign fraud because of it.

WW

Yeah, that fake charge was very convincing.

 

[Toddsterpatriot]

Yes v he did.

He’s a federal felon for campaign fraud because of it.

WW

Show me the proof of his contribution.

 

[Marener]

Thanks for the link.

I didn't see any mention of NDAs.

Why would you think it would mention NDA’s?

 

[WorldWatcher]

He loaned the campaign resulting in an in-a contribution.

The campaign didn't receive any funds from his "loan".

That’s what he was convicted of.

He was convicted of not reporting more than $4 million in income.

The funds expended by Cohen were to benefit the campaign.

The income yes, but in addition the campaign finance feeling.

WW

 

[Political-Junkie]

Trump is still a convicted felon. Many other people are laughing at that.

 

[Marener]

Ha ha ha.

Loss for words?

Not at all. You brought up irrelevant information.

 

[Toddsterpatriot]

Felonies are not a 1-year SOL.

WW

Bookkeeping misdemeanors are misdemeanors with a 1-year SOL.

 

[WorldWatcher]

Show me the proof of his contribution.

Look up good court records.

You are trying to word smith “ contribution” as a direct monetary donation to the campaign. Not what he did.

M he did an in-kind bus the campaign.

Here’s va convicted felon for it.

WW

 

[Toddsterpatriot]

Why would you think it would mention NDA’s?

Why would the law about campaign expenses mention something that wasn't a campaign expense?

 

[Divine Wind]

Did Trump violate FEL as the prosecution told the jury?

Not a lawyer, but it appears Trump has lost his appeals. Do you have something more current than this?

New York judge excoriates Trump’s timing in bid to scrap hush money conviction

The Second Circuit ordered a Manhattan federal judge to reconsider his decision to keep Trump’s falsified business records case in state court instead of removing it to federal court, where Trump can seek to have it tossed post-trial on assertions of sweeping presidential immunity.

courthousenews.com

 

[Political-Junkie]

You cycling around and around to the same debunked point. And NDA is not a crime so there was no crime to conceal, dummy.

Cohen was convicted of a crime regarding the NDA. So yes, there was a crime.

 

[Marener]

Why would the law about campaign expenses mention something that wasn't a campaign expense?

The law defines campaign expenditures. The NDA fits that definition.

It doesn’t individually list everything that is considered a campaign expenditure. That would be absurd.

 

[Toddsterpatriot]

Look up good court records.

You are trying to word smith “ contribution” as a direct monetary donation to the campaign. Not what he did.

M he did an in-kind bus the campaign.

Here’s va convicted felon for it.

WW

You are trying to word smith “ contribution” as a direct monetary donation to the campaign.

Or money spent directly on a campaign expense.
Like advertising to directly advocate for someone's election.

 

[Toddsterpatriot]

The law defines campaign expenditures. The NDA fits that definition.

It doesn’t individually list everything that is considered a campaign expenditure. That would be absurd.

NDAs happen all the time. Are they all campaign contributions?

 

[Delldude]

Not at all. You brought up irrelevant information.

Irrelevant information that formed the basis for the case.

 

[Delldude]

Do you have something more current than this?

That's a decision on moving to the federal courts. I think He's still appealing to the NYSC.

 

[Marener]

NDAs happen all the time. Are they all campaign contributions?

No.

But some are.

 

[Marener]

Irrelevant information that formed the basis for the case.

It’s irrelevant whether the DoJ brought a case against Trump and you do not know whether the lawyers investigating the case believed Trump violated the law or not.