Why do they fall for it so willingly?

You might want to consider doing some independent thinking about this rather than obediently accepting what Trump says about it. There is absolutely no evidence, none, of any prosecutorial misconduct on the part of either woman. The charges they have brought were approved by grand juries after an examination of the facts.

If there was any merit to Trump's allegations evidence of them could have been presented by his attorneys in open court. But there is none. Instead, Trump attacks them on a personal level so knuckle dragging simps like yourself are persuaded, again.......without evidence, that Trump is the victim of persecution.

Being a defendant in 4 criminal cases is not evidence of persecution. It's evidence of rampant criminality.
So some silly little clown that parrots whiny TDS talking points is in no position to question anyone's critical thinking skills. Do I really need to list all your goofball threads that have been 100% wrong?
 
Our resident racist moron and her hatred of DEI.

In reality, it is quite the opposite. Those in favor of DEI and AA are the racist, by definition. Just because you think that it is ok to use race as a factor when making hiring decision to right some imaginary wrongs, doesn’t make it any less racist.
 
Once you stop following anything Progressive Socialist on TV and entertainment it opens up your mind. Think about it. There are people even on these boards who take say late-night hosts supposed comedy based on pure Prog agendas for political reality. Thisin affect is propaganda. Propaganda fed to citizens every minute of the day. In many different forms of entertainment. The ratings can suck yet each program totaled sends the message. Hence the constant repeating which I try to-do at times for my views.
There's apparently also people on this board that try to deny a report by the Senate intelligence Committee when it was led by Republicans doesn't say what it says, even when that report is shown to them.

A person like that is either dumb or willfully ignorant wouldn't you say?
 
HEY STUPID!!! THAT WAS A REPORT FROM THE REPUBLICAN CONTROLLED SENATE.

HEY STUPID. THE SENATE WAS SPLIT EVENLY IN 2020.

WHY DO YOU INSIST THAT YOUR POINTLESS TIRADES TYPED IN CAPS AND BOLDED TEXT MAKES YOU APPEAR TO BE ANYTHING BUT A BUFFOON.
 
Last edited:
Our resident racist moron and her hatred of DEI. How to tell us you're a complete moron without saying it.
The resident racist sloganeer tells us she mindlessly parrots the favored slogan of the self- loathing left.
 
Was the Russian Collusion Hoax, a Hoax? yes or no?
Was Trump Jr. loving to meet up at Trump tower with Russian government reps for Clinton compromat and sanctions policy discussion, a hoax?

Was Trump campaign chair feeding internal polling data to FSB operative real or hoax?

When Papadapolous was lying to FBI about where he got Clinton email hacking info, that was a hoax?

Was Trump publicly running against Russia sanctions, flattering and defending Putin murdering journalists a hoax?

Was Trump trying to secure a contract for Trump tower in Moscow during campaign a hoax?

Nooo, it was real, it was shameful and it was highly conspicuous, even if all of that did not add up to criminal charges on a much higher standard of CRIMINAL CONSPIRACY.
 
Last edited:
Once you stop following anything Progressive Socialist on TV and entertainment it opens up your mind. Think about it. There are people even on these boards who take say late-night hosts supposed comedy based on pure Prog agendas for political reality. Thisin affect is propaganda. Propaganda fed to citizens every minute of the day. In many different forms of entertainment. The ratings can suck yet each program totaled sends the message. Hence the constant repeating which I try to-do at times for my views.
A comedy routine is propaganda? How absurd you are.
 
HEY STUPID!!! THAT WAS A REPORT FROM THE REPUBLICAN CONTROLLED SENATE.
Realizing that, the next step is to throw the Repubs on the committee under the bus. Accuse them of being Dems, or never Trumpers, or anything they can think of as a reason to dismiss the committee's conclusions.
 
HEY STUPID. THE SENATE WAS SPLIT EVENLY IN 2020.

WHY DO YOU INSIST THAT YOUR POINTLESS TIRADES TYPED IN CAPS AND BOLDED TEXT MAKES YOU APPEAR TO BE ANYTHING BUY A BUFFOON.

I put it in big bold type, so you don't miss it, when I had YOU, your ass on a plate.

The Senate issued it's report on Russian Election Inteference in the 2016 election on August 18, 2020. Who was President on August 18, 2020, Hollie??

WHO HELD THE SENATE THROUGHOUT THE TRUMP PRESIDENCY HOLLIE?

WHEN YOU CONTINUE TO POST THINGS THAT ARE EASILY PROVEN FALSE, IT'S NECESSARY TO HIT YOU OVER THE HEAD WITH THEM.
 
you like every other lefty claim everything is racist. The claim is so over used and wrong it has become meaningless.
our goal is to make the word, and the concept meaningless. as meaningless as "communist" or "marxist" when used by modern "conservatives.
 
Was Trump Jr. loving to meet up at Trump tower with Russian government reps for Clinton compromat and sanctions policy discussion, a hoax?

Was Trump campaign chair feeding internal polling data to FSB operative real or hoax?

When Papadapolous was lying to FBI about where he got Clinton email hacking info, that was a hoax,

Was Trump publicly running against Russia sanctions, flattering and defending Putin murdering journalists a hoax?

Was Trump trying to secure a contract for Trump tower in Moscow during campaign a hoax?

Nooo, it was real and it was highly conspicuous, even if all of that did not add up to criminal charges on a much higher standard of CRIMINAL CONSPIRACY.
This is when they close their eyes and stick a finger in their ears.
 
I put it in big bold type, so you don't miss it, when I had YOU, your ass on a plate.

The Senate issued it's report on Russian Election Inteference in the 2016 election on August 18, 2020. Who was President on August 18, 2020, Hollie??

WHO HELD THE SENATE THROUGHOUT THE TRUMP PRESIDENCY HOLLIE?

WHEN YOU CONTINUE TO POST THINGS THAT ARE EASILY PROVEN FALSE, IT'S NECESSARY TO HIT YOU OVER THE HEAD WITH THEM.


What is false about an evenly split senate in 2020? Kamala Harris had the tie breaking vote.

You type in bold, gargantuan text hoping to hide your false, nonsensical claims.

Face it. You're clueless and factless.
 
HEY STUPID. THE SENATE WAS SPLIT EVENLY IN 2020.

WHY DO YOU INSIST THAT YOUR POINTLESS TIRADES TYPED IN CAPS AND BOLDED TEXT MAKES YOU APPEAR TO BE ANYTHING BUT A BUFFOON.
The investigation was conducted when Sen. Richard Burr (R) was the chairman. You appear to be a buffoon.
 
Yeah, good luck with that. It doesn't cover a single one of your idiot premises, at least in the table of contents.

Show me!
The Committee found that the Russian government engaged in an aggressive, multifaceted effort to influence, or attempt to influence, the outcome of the 2016 presidential election. Parts of this effort are outlined in the Committee's earlier volumes on election security, social media, the Obama Administration's response to the threat, and the January 2017 Intelligence Community Assessment (ICA).(U)

The fifth and final volume focuses on the counterintelligence threat, outlining a wide range of Russian efforts to influence the Trump Campaign and the 2016 election. In this volume the Committee lays out its findings in detail by looking at many aspects of the counterintelligence threat posed by the Russian influence operation. For example, the Committee examined Paul Manafort' s connections to Russian influence actors and the FBI' s treatment of reporting produced by Christopher Steele. While the Committee does not describe the final result as a complete picture, this volume provides the most comprehensive description to date of Russia's activities and the threat they posed. This volume presents this information in topical sections in order to address coherently and in detail the wide variety of Russian actions. The events explained in these sections in many cases overlap, and references in each section will direct the reader to those overlapping parts of the volume. Immediately below is a summary of key findings from several sections.


Read it.
 
The investigation was conducted when Sen. Richard Burr (R) was the chairman. You appear to be a buffoon.

And the buffoonish Adam Schiff groupies have been screeching "Russia collusion" for years without a single example of the Russia collusion hoax having an impact on US elections.
 

Forum List

Back
Top