Why do so many people deny climate change

[Abraham3]

Your unique ability to steer into every dead end alleyway --- makes you an exceptionally bad candidate for any science topic.. Hey look ---- a squirrel !!!!!!

You wouldn't know focus if both your eyes were pointed in the same direction.....

The forum title is " Why do so many people deny climate change"...

You obviously don't know what the topic is. And you demonstrated that clearly.

Unfortunately for you, no one here on the sceptic side denies climate change. We KNOW the climate changes, has changed, will change, and is ALWAYS CHANGING.....it is ignorant twerps like you who think you can halt Mother Nature.

Since everyone here knows precisely what is meant by "deny climate change", what has actually been demonstrated is your severe reticence to discuss the real issue - a reticence likely developed from the multiple instances of severe pwnage you've suffered whenever facts and science actually get discussed.

 

[RollingThunder]

Unfortunately for you, no one here on the sceptic side denies climate change.

Another of your braindead lies, walleyed. The Eartg's climate patterns are changing right now and many of the bewildered duped morons in your little cult of reality denial do indeed deny that this is happening, in spite of the massive amounts of clear evidence worldwide. A number of these idiots post their denial of the current rapidly changing climate patterns right here on this forum.

We KNOW the climate changes, has changed, will change, and is ALWAYS CHANGING.....it is ignorant twerps like you who think you can halt Mother Nature.

Thanks to the Dunning-Kruger Effect, you denier cult cretins imagine that you "KNOW" many things that are actually complete bullshit. One of your more ignorant denier cult myths is this 'the climate is "ALWAYS CHANGING" nonsense. Climate means the reoccurring average weather conditions of a certain region, including temperature, rainfall, and wind, averaged over many years.

There have actually been many periods of relatively stable world climate patterns that remained stable for thousands, tens of thousands or even millions of years. Here's an example of an 80,000 year long period of relative worldwide climate stability.

Climate stability during the Pliocene warm period
Paleoceanography
Volume 18, Issue 4, December 2003
Amy E. Draut1, Maureen E. Raymo2, Jerry F. McManus3, Delia W. Oppo3
Article first published online: 7 OCT 2003
DOI: 10.1029/2003PA000889
ABSTRACT
We present a high-resolution climate record from a sediment core spanning an 80-kyr interval of time during the mid-Pliocene epoch, when warmer conditions and lower global ice volume prevailed worldwide. Oxygen and carbon isotope analyses were made on benthic and planktonic foraminifera from ODP Site 981 in the North Atlantic. The amplitude and approximate recurrence interval of suborbital variations in these records are comparable to those of Holocene and marine isotope stage 11 (MIS 11) records from the North Atlantic. We conclude that the mid-Pliocene warm interval was a time of relative climatic stability.


******

 

[flacaltenn]

Unfortunately for you, no one here on the sceptic side denies climate change.

Another of your braindead lies, walleyed. The Eartg's climate patterns are changing right now and many of the bewildered duped morons in your little cult of reality denial do indeed deny that this is happening, in spite of the massive amounts of clear evidence worldwide. A number of these idiots post their denial of the current rapidly changing climate patterns right here on this forum.

We KNOW the climate changes, has changed, will change, and is ALWAYS CHANGING.....it is ignorant twerps like you who think you can halt Mother Nature.

Thanks to the Dunning-Kruger Effect, you denier cult cretins imagine that you "KNOW" many things that are actually complete bullshit. One of your more ignorant denier cult myths is this 'the climate is "ALWAYS CHANGING" nonsense. Climate means the reoccurring average weather conditions of a certain region, including temperature, rainfall, and wind, averaged over many years.

There have actually been many periods of relatively stable world climate patterns that remained stable for thousands, tens of thousands or even millions of years. Here's an example of an 80,000 year long period of relative worldwide climate stability.

Climate stability during the Pliocene warm period
Paleoceanography
Volume 18, Issue 4, December 2003
Amy E. Draut1, Maureen E. Raymo2, Jerry F. McManus3, Delia W. Oppo3
Article first published online: 7 OCT 2003
DOI: 10.1029/2003PA000889
ABSTRACT
We present a high-resolution climate record from a sediment core spanning an 80-kyr interval of time during the mid-Pliocene epoch, when warmer conditions and lower global ice volume prevailed worldwide. Oxygen and carbon isotope analyses were made on benthic and planktonic foraminifera from ODP Site 981 in the North Atlantic. The amplitude and approximate recurrence interval of suborbital variations in these records are comparable to those of Holocene and marine isotope stage 11 (MIS 11) records from the North Atlantic. We conclude that the mid-Pliocene warm interval was a time of relative climatic stability.


******

Wow tinkerbelle 70, 000 years eh. Whats the temporal resolution of fossilized plankton? 100 years? 400hears? Not much climare can vary at those sampli ng intervals right?

 

[westwall]

The forum title is " Why do so many people deny climate change"...

You obviously don't know what the topic is. And you demonstrated that clearly.

Unfortunately for you, no one here on the sceptic side denies climate change. We KNOW the climate changes, has changed, will change, and is ALWAYS CHANGING.....it is ignorant twerps like you who think you can halt Mother Nature.

Since everyone here knows precisely what is meant by "deny climate change", what has actually been demonstrated is your severe reticence to discuss the real issue - a reticence likely developed from the multiple instances of severe pwnage you've suffered whenever facts and science actually get discussed.

You asshats couldn't pwn yourselves, much less me. I have handed you your hats so many times I've lost count. But that's OK, one has to be self aware to understand when they are crushed and all of you are so blissfully unaware it is obvious that no amount of scientific evidence will ever sway you from your religious fanaticism.

Those Westboro clowns could learn a thing or two from you...

 

[RollingThunder]

Unfortunately for you, no one here on the sceptic side denies climate change.

Another of your braindead lies, walleyed. The Eartg's climate patterns are changing right now and many of the bewildered duped morons in your little cult of reality denial do indeed deny that this is happening, in spite of the massive amounts of clear evidence worldwide. A number of these idiots post their denial of the current rapidly changing climate patterns right here on this forum.

We KNOW the climate changes, has changed, will change, and is ALWAYS CHANGING.....it is ignorant twerps like you who think you can halt Mother Nature.

Thanks to the Dunning-Kruger Effect, you denier cult cretins imagine that you "KNOW" many things that are actually complete bullshit. One of your more ignorant denier cult myths is this 'the climate is "ALWAYS CHANGING" nonsense. Climate means the reoccurring average weather conditions of a certain region, including temperature, rainfall, and wind, averaged over many years.

There have actually been many periods of relatively stable world climate patterns that remained stable for thousands, tens of thousands or even millions of years. Here's an example of an 80,000 year long period of relative worldwide climate stability.

Climate stability during the Pliocene warm period
Paleoceanography
Volume 18, Issue 4, December 2003
Amy E. Draut1, Maureen E. Raymo2, Jerry F. McManus3, Delia W. Oppo3
Article first published online: 7 OCT 2003
DOI: 10.1029/2003PA000889
ABSTRACT
We present a high-resolution climate record from a sediment core spanning an 80-kyr interval of time during the mid-Pliocene epoch, when warmer conditions and lower global ice volume prevailed worldwide. Oxygen and carbon isotope analyses were made on benthic and planktonic foraminifera from ODP Site 981 in the North Atlantic. The amplitude and approximate recurrence interval of suborbital variations in these records are comparable to those of Holocene and marine isotope stage 11 (MIS 11) records from the North Atlantic. We conclude that the mid-Pliocene warm interval was a time of relative climatic stability.


******

Wow tinkerbelle 70, 000 years eh. Whats the temporal resolution of fossilized plankton? 100 years? 400hears? Not much climare can vary at those sampli ng intervals right?

You don't know and yet you spin your ignorance into a sneer at what these scientists are calling "a high-resolution climate record" in order to preserve your idiotic belief in your cult's myths. You're pathetic.

 

[Abraham3]

Unfortunately for you, no one here on the sceptic side denies climate change. We KNOW the climate changes, has changed, will change, and is ALWAYS CHANGING.....it is ignorant twerps like you who think you can halt Mother Nature.

Since everyone here knows precisely what is meant by "deny climate change", what has actually been demonstrated is your severe reticence to discuss the real issue - a reticence likely developed from the multiple instances of severe pwnage you've suffered whenever facts and science actually get discussed.

You asshats couldn't pwn yourselves, much less me. I have handed you your hats so many times I've lost count. But that's OK, one has to be self aware to understand when they are crushed and all of you are so blissfully unaware it is obvious that no amount of scientific evidence will ever sway you from your religious fanaticism.

Those Westboro clowns could learn a thing or two from you...

And how many minds have you changed?

What is your position now? You accept climate change but deny human responsibility? Are you with FCT in the solar camp? Do you blame cosmic rays effecting our cloud cover? Just what DO you believe responsible for the last century's warming? You'd think that if you'd handed me my hat as often as you claim, I'd know this stuff.

 

[PMZ]

Unfortunately for you, no one here on the sceptic side denies climate change. We KNOW the climate changes, has changed, will change, and is ALWAYS CHANGING.....it is ignorant twerps like you who think you can halt Mother Nature.

Since everyone here knows precisely what is meant by "deny climate change", what has actually been demonstrated is your severe reticence to discuss the real issue - a reticence likely developed from the multiple instances of severe pwnage you've suffered whenever facts and science actually get discussed.

You asshats couldn't pwn yourselves, much less me. I have handed you your hats so many times I've lost count. But that's OK, one has to be self aware to understand when they are crushed and all of you are so blissfully unaware it is obvious that no amount of scientific evidence will ever sway you from your religious fanaticism.

Those Westboro clowns could learn a thing or two from you...

Here's a dramatic fantasy. Conservative porn.

 

[CrusaderFrank]

The AGWCult is truly a cult. Their godhead IPCC backtracked on their predictions to line up more closely with the Decline Hiders but the Cult continues as if nothing happened

 

[CrusaderFrank]

When you have no science, call your opponents "deniers"

 

[Uncensored2008]

 

[Uncensored2008]

When you have no science, call your opponents "deniers"

We don't need to believe in vaccines. They are not based on faith and don't rely on believe. We don't need to believe in diodes, or lasers, or liquid crystals.

Real science doesn't depend on belief, it depends on fact, observable and repeatable. That which relies on faith is religion, not science. People like Michael Mann and Abraham are Shamans, not scientists.

 

[PMZ]

When you have no science, call your opponents "deniers"

We don't need to believe in vaccines. They are not based on faith and don't rely on believe. We don't need to believe in diodes, or lasers, or liquid crystals.

Real science doesn't depend on belief, it depends on fact, observable and repeatable. That which relies on faith is religion, not science. People like Michael Mann and Abraham are Shamans, not scientists.

As a scientist, you must have solid evidence of what you claim.

What is it?

 

[itfitzme]

The AGWCult is truly a cult. Their godhead IPCC backtracked on their predictions to line up more closely with the Decline Hiders but the Cult continues as if nothing happened

There is not such thing as an AGW Cult. You are simply incapable of independent thinking, subscribe to talking points of your denialist buddies, and mistake actual understanding of science as the only thing your capable of imagining, your personal cult like behavior.

 

[itfitzme]

Another reason that many deny climate change is a lack of understanding of what science actually is. They are limited to some belief that they have absolute certainty of things. It is a symptom of an overactive amygdala. I don't know if its congenital or the result of being abused as children, but the addiction to adrenaline and the lack of any real thinking is obvious.

 

[itfitzme]

OMG! DR. MANN IS CLEARLY THE SECRET DICTATOR OF THE WORLD! HE COMMANDS ALL!

No, he's just a two bit fraud, pulling one of the oldest cons in the book.

He depends on stupid people. like you, to buy into the tribal bullshit of an angry volcano god.

The only stupid people I've seen on this board are you and other denialist buddies. Your in the solid company of the likes of; Slackstack, who doesn't know what photosynthesis is and SSaDhD who things that there is a "force" that makes energy flow.

 

[itfitzme]

Your unique ability to steer into every dead end alleyway --- makes you an exceptionally bad candidate for any science topic.. Hey look ---- a squirrel !!!!!!

You wouldn't know focus if both your eyes were pointed in the same direction.....

The forum title is " Why do so many people deny climate change"...

You obviously don't know what the topic is. And you demonstrated that clearly.

Unfortunately for you, no one here on the sceptic side denies climate change. We KNOW the climate changes, has changed, will change, and is ALWAYS CHANGING.....it is ignorant twerps like you who think you can halt Mother Nature.

As has been pointed out, your comment is obvious bullshit as you and everyone else is perfectly aware of what climate change and AWG means.

Your denial behavior is so ingrained, your even denying that your deny climate change.

You are simply showing your ridiculous bullshit that you spew, creating strawman arguments and pretending ignorance of the intent and context of the conversation. What you demonstrate is passive aggressive behavior, pretending "I don't know what you mean..." like you did when you were ten. Grow up, dude. Your not ten, that bullshit doesn't mean anything in an adult world, didn't work last time you got arrested, and no one here is your mommy or daddy.

 

[itfitzme]

Unfortunately for you, no one here on the sceptic side denies climate change.

Another of your braindead lies, walleyed. The Eartg's climate patterns are changing right now and many of the bewildered duped morons in your little cult of reality denial do indeed deny that this is happening, in spite of the massive amounts of clear evidence worldwide. A number of these idiots post their denial of the current rapidly changing climate patterns right here on this forum.

We KNOW the climate changes, has changed, will change, and is ALWAYS CHANGING.....it is ignorant twerps like you who think you can halt Mother Nature.

Thanks to the Dunning-Kruger Effect, you denier cult cretins imagine that you "KNOW" many things that are actually complete bullshit. One of your more ignorant denier cult myths is this 'the climate is "ALWAYS CHANGING" nonsense. Climate means the reoccurring average weather conditions of a certain region, including temperature, rainfall, and wind, averaged over many years.

There have actually been many periods of relatively stable world climate patterns that remained stable for thousands, tens of thousands or even millions of years. Here's an example of an 80,000 year long period of relative worldwide climate stability.

Climate stability during the Pliocene warm period
Paleoceanography
Volume 18, Issue 4, December 2003
Amy E. Draut1, Maureen E. Raymo2, Jerry F. McManus3, Delia W. Oppo3
Article first published online: 7 OCT 2003
DOI: 10.1029/2003PA000889
ABSTRACT
We present a high-resolution climate record from a sediment core spanning an 80-kyr interval of time during the mid-Pliocene epoch, when warmer conditions and lower global ice volume prevailed worldwide. Oxygen and carbon isotope analyses were made on benthic and planktonic foraminifera from ODP Site 981 in the North Atlantic. The amplitude and approximate recurrence interval of suborbital variations in these records are comparable to those of Holocene and marine isotope stage 11 (MIS 11) records from the North Atlantic. We conclude that the mid-Pliocene warm interval was a time of relative climatic stability.


******

Wow tinkerbelle 70, 000 years eh. Whats the temporal resolution of fossilized plankton? 100 years? 400hears? Not much climare can vary at those sampli ng intervals right?

So your premise is that it varied markedly over 50 year intervals, first swinging wildly one way then returning back to it's stable point, thus presenting the illusion that it didn't change at all over the 70,000 years?

You have some evidence to back up that scenario?

Or are you just imagining shit again and believing it's reality?

 

[itfitzme]

What amazes me is the marked difference between the scientifically literate and the deniers. I can simply pay attention to the wealth of information presented by Mamooth, Abraham, and a few others and be kept busy learning. To the contrary, the likes of Slacksack, Walleyed, SSaDhD, Crusty Frank, Unscented, and others drone on with endless posts that lack any significant information. And when they do, perchance, post something that contains specific content, it is quickly demonstrated as erroneous bs.

The other obvious pattern of behavior is how quickly Slacksack, Walleyed, SSaDhD, Crusty Frank, Unscented fall to insults, whining endlessly when insulted back. The appear completely oblivious to the fact that they demonstrably and consistently are the first to go to insults. In their mind, I am sure, they actually believe they were insulted first. It is, as I have come to realize, a perception where the identical behavior is separated by "When I was an asshole, I had a good reason" and "When he was mean, it hurt my feelings".

 

[itfitzme]

Unfortunately for you, no one here on the sceptic side denies climate change. We KNOW the climate changes, has changed, will change, and is ALWAYS CHANGING.....it is ignorant twerps like you who think you can halt Mother Nature.

Since everyone here knows precisely what is meant by "deny climate change", what has actually been demonstrated is your severe reticence to discuss the real issue - a reticence likely developed from the multiple instances of severe pwnage you've suffered whenever facts and science actually get discussed.

You asshats couldn't pwn yourselves, much less me. I have handed you your hats so many times I've lost count. But that's OK, one has to be self aware to understand when they are crushed and all of you are so blissfully unaware it is obvious that no amount of scientific evidence will ever sway you from your religious fanaticism.

Those Westboro clowns could learn a thing or two from you...

You are delusional.

Here is you handing someone their hat...

 

[westwall]

Since everyone here knows precisely what is meant by "deny climate change", what has actually been demonstrated is your severe reticence to discuss the real issue - a reticence likely developed from the multiple instances of severe pwnage you've suffered whenever facts and science actually get discussed.

You asshats couldn't pwn yourselves, much less me. I have handed you your hats so many times I've lost count. But that's OK, one has to be self aware to understand when they are crushed and all of you are so blissfully unaware it is obvious that no amount of scientific evidence will ever sway you from your religious fanaticism.

Those Westboro clowns could learn a thing or two from you...

And how many minds have you changed?

What is your position now? You accept climate change but deny human responsibility? Are you with FCT in the solar camp? Do you blame cosmic rays effecting our cloud cover? Just what DO you believe responsible for the last century's warming? You'd think that if you'd handed me my hat as often as you claim, I'd know this stuff.

Since you and your cast of clones arrived on this board? Fifteen. They were on the fence but thanks to your inept presentation, and my concise destruction of your horse poo, they have come over to the sceptic side.

THANKS!