Challenge to the AGW Cult

[CrusaderFrank]

The AGW Cult has theorized that a 800PPM CO2 concentration will raise temperature 3, 5, 8 degrees. Pick a number

That's called a "theory"

Now get into a lab and test it

Show me the repeatable lab experiments that show a 3-8 degree increase in temperature from an 800PPM increase in CO2 and I'll become a believer

 

[Mr. H.]

You won't get any takers without dangling some $$$.
And lots of it.

 

[Abraham3]

What in your lab experiment would you use to represent the Earth?

 

[Hoffstra]

the Earth will prove the theory to be true or false.

 

[CrusaderFrank]

What in your lab experiment would you use to represent the Earth?

Something like a constant heat source, and atmosphere 80% N2, 19% O2, Ar, and a wisp of CO2, vs a atmosphere with all the above and 800PPM of CO2

 

[Hoffstra]

My guess? The Earth will get warmer.

Not as much and not as fast as the extremists think, but it will happen.

What will the affect be? Who knows, we ain't smart enough to know.

 

[CrusaderFrank]

the Earth will prove the theory to be true or false.

That's not science, Dear

 

[Hoffstra]

the Earth will prove the theory to be true or false.

That's not science, Dear

sure it is, sweety.

if the theory is correct, the Earth's average temps will increase over the decades.

if the theory is crap, nothing will change.

that's called "science".

 

[CrusaderFrank]

the Earth will prove the theory to be true or false.

That's not science, Dear

sure it is, sweety.

if the theory is correct, the Earth's average temps will increase over the decades.

if the theory is crap, nothing will change.

that's called "science".

That's an "Observation"

That's a looooooooooooooooooooooooooooong way from a Theory that's not falsified

 

[CrusaderFrank]

No experiments.

800PPM CO2 is supposed to raise temperature 8 degrees in 100 years, they have the chance to shown the effects of an IMMEDIATE 800PPM increase in CO2 and we get

[ame=http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=K8E_zMLCRNg]Cricket Sound - YouTube[/ame]

 

[skookerasbil]

plus Frank.......its impact is like throwing a handball into the ocean, if it even has an impact!!!!




[ame=http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=NBO2IstMi2A]CO2 is a trace gas. - YouTube[/ame]




Who's not winning??

 

[skookerasbil]

Meanwhile Frank......on any slightly cloudy day ( never on a clear day!!) you look up in the sky and see dozens of these leaving these slowly disapating gas trails. The k00ks don't even bat an eyelash at this stuff.....cant mess with the established narrative!!!


[ame=http://www.youtube.com/watch?feature=player_embedded&v=sdO8I3p6zJ4]CHEMTRAIL SPRAYING TANKER CAUGHT BY PRIVATE JET SPRAYING - YouTube[/ame]

 

[skookerasbil]

 

[mamooth]

Why on earth does Frank think his challenge isn't retarded? Does he really think one should be able accurately repeat the behavior of a whole planet in a lab?

You can, of course, show the greenhouse gases making a small system hotter as concentrations increase. As was done a century ago. Denialist cultists are bit behind the times.

 

[RetiredGySgt]

Why on earth does Frank think his challenge isn't retarded? Does he really think one should be able accurately repeat the behavior of a whole planet in a lab?

You can, of course, show the greenhouse gases making a small system hotter as concentrations increase. As was done a century ago. Denialist cultists are bit behind the times.

If one experiment 100 years ago proved it why hasn't it been duplicated? Why are today's scientists afraid to run the experiment?

 

[mamooth]

What are you talking about? It's trivial to show greenhouse gases absorbing IR, and it's done all the times, even in middle schools.

 

[RetiredGySgt]

What are you talking about? It's trivial to show greenhouse gases absorbing IR, and it's done all the times, even in middle schools.

It is also scientific fact that as CO2 goes up its effect on absorbing heat lessens. But you would never know that with the hysteria you warmers use. Further if rising CO2 is causing heat increases how come from 1998 to present there has been none? Did CO2 quit rising?

 

[Abraham3]

What are you talking about? It's trivial to show greenhouse gases absorbing IR, and it's done all the times, even in middle schools.

It is also scientific fact that as CO2 goes up its effect on absorbing heat lessens. But you would never know that with the hysteria you warmers use. Further if rising CO2 is causing heat increases how come from 1998 to present there has been none?

There has been warming:

Did CO2 quit rising?

The density of air at STP is 1.2 kg/m^3. The density of CO2 at STP is 1.977 kg/m^3.

 

[daveman]

What in your lab experiment would you use to represent the Earth?

They way you guys keep pointing at Tyndall's experiment, you seem to think a jar of gas works nicely.

 

[daveman]

the Earth will prove the theory to be true or false.

That's not science, Dear

sure it is, sweety.

if the theory is correct, the Earth's average temps will increase over the decades.

if the theory is crap, nothing will change.

that's called "science".

No, it's not. The climate wasn't static before American coal and SUVs came along.

The climate has always and will always change.