danielpalos
Diamond Member
- Banned
- #841
An ounce of prevention is worth a pound of cure. False witness bearers have no morals.An abortionist shouldn't be lecturing others about "morals".
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
An ounce of prevention is worth a pound of cure. False witness bearers have no morals.An abortionist shouldn't be lecturing others about "morals".
With a few exceptions, it's largely due to irresponsible decision making and a lack of self responsibility and accountability.Why do poor communities exist in America?
Like black codes did in the past?With a few exceptions, it's largely due to irresponsible decision making and a lack of self responsibility and accountability.
No State legislature has any authority to abridge at-will employment law for any other public policy.
It takes morals to bear true witness. Too lazy?
Yes, with equal protection of the laws for unemployment compensation; the expense of litigation should be lower and businesses more efficient as a result since Labor could simply quit and go on unemployment if there are any problems with a work environment. Even black listing should not be illegal then.So if someone is hurt on the job, the employer can fire them at will?
If someone accuses their employer of sexual harassment, the employer can fire them for any reason or no reason?
If someone blows the whistle on their employer, they can be fired at the will of the employer?
Yes, with equal protection of the laws for unemployment compensation; the expense of litigation should be lower and businesses more efficient as a result since Labor could simply quit and go on unemployment if there are any problems with a work environment. Even black listing should not be illegal then.
Equal protection of the laws for unemployment compensation can change that. Employer costs should come down enough to make a difference.Bullshit. Your ideas are absolutely foolish. You cannot fire a whistle blower, or someone bringing sexual harassment charges.
Equal protection of the laws for unemployment compensation can change that. Employer costs should come down enough to make a difference.
There should be less need for "whistleblowing" since more motivated labor will be coming up with better solutions. And, there are usually procedures for that in any organization. Besides, we can't run an economy that depends on whistleblowers instead of better solutions at lower cost.How does allowing a whistleblower to be fired bring down costs? It would prevent all future whistleblowing, and allow wrongs to go unpunished.
But the fact that there are times when it is illegal fire someone, even in a work at-will state, proves that the simple definition of at-will employment does not mean all employment laws follow it.
There should be less need for "whistleblowing" since more motivated labor will be coming up with better solutions. And, there are usually procedures for that in any organization. Besides, we can't run an economy that depends on whistleblowers instead of better solutions at lower cost.
What you posted is even less relevant. See how easy that is. Employment at-will means the employer doesn't need good cause. Unlike what y'all want to insist on for Labor as the least wealthy in our republic.What you posted is irrelevant. The reason I brought up whistleblowers is because you said no law can be passed that does not follow the definition of at-will employment laws. The laws concerning whistleblowers are obviously not in line with what you say must be for all laws. Neither are jobs which are covered by a contract, especially when a union is involved. So your entire premise is blown.
What you posted is even less relevant. See how easy that is. Employment at-will means the employer doesn't need good cause. Unlike what y'all want to insist on for Labor as the least wealthy in our republic.
There is no such natural rate of unemployment and such lioomits are not an abridgementany contribution is a form of tax. how did you come up with your reasoning? unemployment compensation is compensation for capitalism's natural rate of unemployment. limits are an abridgment to that compensation.
lol. for-cause employment is not the same as at-will employment. and, unequal protection of the laws now means different application of the laws than would be the case with equal protection; since labor would be able to quit and still collect unemployment compensation. Knowing that, employers would have a different attitude toward labor than they do now.You said, several times, that no policy or law can go against the at-will employment laws. In fact, that is the basis for your entire "unequal protection under the law" argument.
And yet, here is a specific situation in which an employer is not allowed to fire an employee at will.
A person employed under contract (especially a union contract) also cannot be fired at will.
If those are true, and you have nothing saying unemployment compensation must follow the at-will employment laws, then your claims are baseless.
Thanks for playing.
You only have appeals to ignorance not any valid arguments.There is no such natural rate of unemployment and such lioomits are not an abridgement
It does not exist dumbassYou only have appeals to ignorance not any valid arguments.
What Is the Natural Unemployment Rate?
The natural unemployment rate is measured by the number of people unemployed due to the structure of the labor force, such as those who lack the skills to gain employment or those moving from job to job.www.investopedia.com
lol. for-cause employment is not the same as at-will employment. and, unequal protection of the laws now means different application of the laws than would be the case with equal protection; since labor would be able to quit and still collect unemployment compensation. Knowing that, employers would have a different attitude toward labor than they do now.
Show us the link, full of fallacy right-winger.It does not exist dumbass
Stating facts is not an appeal to ignorance. I stated fact and you are a false witness bearing liar and a sack of treasonous shit