The one thing about this board that most baffles me is the incredible depth of hatred and contempt for liberals.
The amount of comments from people suggesting all liberals are stupid, anti-patriotic, dumb...you name it. One even suggested liberals don't know what paragraphs are.
I don't get it. And I don't see anything the like the contempt expressed by liberals towards conservatives.
Firstly, the term "liberal" could be used to describe about half of the planet. Like "leftist", it's a fairly cliched catch-all adjective that have little real meaning. It's just too general to be much use.
Secondly, I've met extremely intelligent people from right across the political spectrum - and as many idiots. I've talked to brilliant facists, idiotic conservatives, intelligent communists and brain-dead centrists. I don't see a pattern there at all.
And lastly, why hate liberals when many of the most successful and celebrated administrations have been liberal ones? Were the governments if Clinton, Wilson, FDR, JFK and Truman really so much worse than conservative governments of similar eras?
The constant attacks on liberals seems to me (as an outsider) just a sign of incredible arrogance and conceit - and I would consider attacks on conservatives the same way.
If there is a REAL reason, with facts, for hating liberals - let's hear about it.
Saigon, there have been numerous studies on conservatism that explain their fear based belief system, their love of authoritarian leaders, their worship of materialism, the opulent and their utter disdain for anyone who isn't wealthy.
But it is neither 'arrogance or conceit'. When you understand how fear and insecurity manifest in human behavior, it is much easier to understand.
Among the most critical authors of how conservatism has become so destructive and a threat to democracy is John Dean, who was legal counsel to Richard M. Nixon, and a close friend of the late Republican Senator Barry Goldwater. Goldwater, was extremely concerned about the direction conservatism had taken late in his life. Dean's book, "
Conservatives Without Conscience" was started as a collaborative effort with Goldwater. Dean shared the senator’s dislike of the “so-called social conservatives” who have risen to prominence within Republican ranks over the past several decades, and the pair planned a book for which they would talk “with people like Chuck Colson, Pat Robertson and Jerry Falwell” and “attempt to understand their strident and intolerant politics.”
The project was cut short by Goldwater’s death in 1998, but Dean remained dedicated to unmasking what he sees as the new and dangerous breed of “tough, coldblooded, ruthless authoritarians” who have “co-opted” conservatism.
Here is a long list of Dean's writing with links.
FindLaw's Writ | John Dean
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Here is a great article about conservatism that appeared in Psychology Today
The Ideological Animal
Excerpt:
"All people are born alike—except Republicans and Democrats," quipped Groucho Marx, and in fact it turns out that personality differences between liberals and conservatives are evident in early childhood. In 1969, Berkeley professors Jack and Jeanne Block embarked on a study of childhood personality, asking nursery school teachers to rate children's temperaments. They weren't even thinking about political orientation.
Twenty years later, they decided to compare the subjects' childhood personalities with their political preferences as adults. They found arresting patterns. As kids, liberals had developed close relationships with peers and were rated by their teachers as self-reliant, energetic, impulsive, and resilient. People who were conservative at age 23 had been described by their teachers as easily victimized, easily offended, indecisive, fearful, rigid, inhibited, and vulnerable at age 3. The reason for the difference, the Blocks hypothesized, was that insecure kids most needed the reassurance of tradition and authority, and they found it in conservative politics.