Why do Democrats Trivialize The Threat From Radical Islam

[elvis]

I don't trivialize the threat from radical Islam.... I just don't think all muslims are radical or that the religion itself is a "death religion" or whatever nonsense that people spew.

Then you simply have no knowledge of the religion.

99% of Muslims are relatively harmless.



So were 99% of Nazis.

No. 99% of Nazis were NOT harmless. You obvious don't have a 'working knowledge' of Nazi Germany so you're just making chit up.

or he has a lot of knowledge of Nazi Germany and is still making chit up.

 

[logical4u]

Wasn't Osama THE symbol of Radical Islam?

What did the "leader of the Left" according to RWers, Obama, do with Osama?

Hint: Killed his A$$.

Thread's over.


LoL!

So, you are saying we should just "ignore" all the threats made from radical islamists since Osama's death was announced? Are you saying they are "trivial"?

 

[logical4u]

So am I to take your current spin to mean that I am not one of the "cadre"? LOL

If you had any wits you would take it to mean that you are a drooling dolt.

So in other words you are referring to at least two people who disagree with you as nazis?? Got it. LOL

Do you agree with Lasher and bod that the JOOOOOZZZZZ control everything?

What? Where in the world have I EVER said anything like that?


(Knowing that you will never, ever be able to prove your comment....just another slimy lie by Uncensored)

It was a QUESTION!!!! Try to answer it.

 

[logical4u]

There is a greater danger of horrific attack (like a nuclear bomb or flying planes into Nuclear plants, building, or truck bombs) from the Islamic Radicals. The Christian Fundies threat I see as less horrific in nature. (like killing abortion providers).

Thank you, that is much clearer. Would you care to count the numbers of people killed by "Christian Fundies" in comparison to islamic radicals?

And how will that prove or disprove Democrats trivialize the threat from Radical Islam?

Until dems do a "side by side" comparison, many dems make statement implying that "Christian terrorists" do as much damage as "Islamic terrorists". If the "dems" were not trying to trivialize the islamic terrorists, the numbers would "clarify" the whole subject. Why won't dems state the facts, using numbers? This is the number we "know" have been killed by islamic terrorists in the last x years; this is the number we "know" have been killed by Christian terrorists in the last x years. Look, at the numbers; they are comparable or NOT. According to many dems, the numbers are the similar (but they won't use "actual" numbers). That is "trivializing/ignoring" islamic terrorists.

 

[logical4u]

Actually, I do have a fairly good grasp on the religion, and also of the culture... let me clue you in on something. The Culture of the Middle East has more to do with radicalism than the religion.

What "religion" do ALL those radicals in the ME practice?

 

[bodecea]

BS! Where have I EVER said that?

Yawn..

You know these threads stay on the board, doncha?

http://www.usmessageboard.com/polit...ant-the-us-to-spend-on-israeli-defense-9.html

You just lie and lie and lie, don't you? Getting to the point that no one who isn't a partisan hack believes anything you say anymore.

ROFL

Irony indeed.

You know bod, if you don't want to get grouped with the Nazis, then hanging with Lasher and Dr. Drock ain't a great idea..

I knew you couldn't prove your lies....more and more people here are getting to see what your idea of "integrity" is....lie and lie and lie. That's your integrity.

 

[BlindBoo]

Thank you, that is much clearer. Would you care to count the numbers of people killed by "Christian Fundies" in comparison to islamic radicals?

And how will that prove or disprove Democrats trivialize the threat from Radical Islam?

Until dems do a "side by side" comparison, many dems make statement implying that "Christian terrorists" do as much damage as "Islamic terrorists". If the "dems" were not trying to trivialize the islamic terrorists, the numbers would "clarify" the whole subject. Why won't dems state the facts, using numbers? This is the number we "know" have been killed by islamic terrorists in the last x years; this is the number we "know" have been killed by Christian terrorists in the last x years. Look, at the numbers; they are comparable or NOT. According to many dems, the numbers are the similar (but they won't use "actual" numbers). That is "trivializing/ignoring" islamic terrorists.

I don't need a side by side comparison, I've already stated that I beleive there is a greater threat coming from the Radical Islamics. I can only answer for myself and my beliefs. I have never implied the above (in bold type) as it applies to the modern world or current history.

Who exactly is saying that "Christian terrorists" do as much damage as "Islamic terrorists"?

 

[logical4u]

And how will that prove or disprove Democrats trivialize the threat from Radical Islam?

Until dems do a "side by side" comparison, many dems make statement implying that "Christian terrorists" do as much damage as "Islamic terrorists". If the "dems" were not trying to trivialize the islamic terrorists, the numbers would "clarify" the whole subject. Why won't dems state the facts, using numbers? This is the number we "know" have been killed by islamic terrorists in the last x years; this is the number we "know" have been killed by Christian terrorists in the last x years. Look, at the numbers; they are comparable or NOT. According to many dems, the numbers are the similar (but they won't use "actual" numbers). That is "trivializing/ignoring" islamic terrorists.

I don't need a side by side comparison, I've already stated that I beleive there is a greater threat coming from the Radical Islamics. I can only answer for myself and my beliefs. I have never implied the above (in bold type) as it applies to the modern world or current history.

Who exactly is saying that "Christian terrorists" do as much damage as "Islamic terrorists"?

Rosie Odonell, for one, on her show, and many, many others. By not using numbers and implying that islamic terrorists are "matched" by Christian terrorists (by any time islamic terrorists are mentioned, changing the subject to Eric Rudolf, Timmothy McViegh, and Terry Nichols), islamic terrorists are being "trivialized". When asked, you did clarify your statements, thank you. You are rare!

 

[bodecea]

Until dems do a "side by side" comparison, many dems make statement implying that "Christian terrorists" do as much damage as "Islamic terrorists". If the "dems" were not trying to trivialize the islamic terrorists, the numbers would "clarify" the whole subject. Why won't dems state the facts, using numbers? This is the number we "know" have been killed by islamic terrorists in the last x years; this is the number we "know" have been killed by Christian terrorists in the last x years. Look, at the numbers; they are comparable or NOT. According to many dems, the numbers are the similar (but they won't use "actual" numbers). That is "trivializing/ignoring" islamic terrorists.

I don't need a side by side comparison, I've already stated that I beleive there is a greater threat coming from the Radical Islamics. I can only answer for myself and my beliefs. I have never implied the above (in bold type) as it applies to the modern world or current history.

Who exactly is saying that "Christian terrorists" do as much damage as "Islamic terrorists"?

Rosie Odonell, for one, on her show, and many, many others. By not using numbers and implying that islamic terrorists are "matched" by Christian terrorists (by any time islamic terrorists are mentioned, changing the subject to Eric Rudolf, Timmothy McViegh, and Terry Nichols), islamic terrorists are being "trivialized". When asked, you did clarify your statements, thank you. You are rare!

So, you think pointing out people B doing something bad trivializes what People A are doing bad? Isn't that what little kids do? How do the grownups buy THAT excuse?

 

[Caroljo]

Ok, what do you think is a legit potential risk of what radical islam can do to the US?

(I'm not a democrat, just curious)

Ah, you little racist Zionist pig.

Didn't you hear the update on 9-11? 20 seconds before that picture was taken, the hijackers converted to Christianity. So....technically, Christians did that! Booyah!! In yo face Christians!!!

God would have known they were just "faking" it...lol! God knows what's in everyone's heart and thoughts, so they didn't get away with anything. Just saying your a Christian doesn't make you one...

 

[logical4u]

I don't need a side by side comparison, I've already stated that I beleive there is a greater threat coming from the Radical Islamics. I can only answer for myself and my beliefs. I have never implied the above (in bold type) as it applies to the modern world or current history.

Who exactly is saying that "Christian terrorists" do as much damage as "Islamic terrorists"?

Rosie Odonell, for one, on her show, and many, many others. By not using numbers and implying that islamic terrorists are "matched" by Christian terrorists (by any time islamic terrorists are mentioned, changing the subject to Eric Rudolf, Timmothy McViegh, and Terry Nichols), islamic terrorists are being "trivialized". When asked, you did clarify your statements, thank you. You are rare!

So, you think pointing out people B doing something bad trivializes what People A are doing bad? Isn't that what little kids do? How do the grownups buy THAT excuse?

Still waiting for you to discuss Abraham and his offspring .....

nanny, nanny, boo, boo

 

[bodecea]

Rosie Odonell, for one, on her show, and many, many others. By not using numbers and implying that islamic terrorists are "matched" by Christian terrorists (by any time islamic terrorists are mentioned, changing the subject to Eric Rudolf, Timmothy McViegh, and Terry Nichols), islamic terrorists are being "trivialized". When asked, you did clarify your statements, thank you. You are rare!

So, you think pointing out people B doing something bad trivializes what People A are doing bad? Isn't that what little kids do? How do the grownups buy THAT excuse?

Still waiting for you to discuss Abraham and his offspring .....

nanny, nanny, boo, boo

If you will recall, I am the one who answered your questions on Isaac, Jacob (Israel)....but if you've got more....go right ahead and ask them.

 

[BlindBoo]

Until dems do a "side by side" comparison, many dems make statement implying that "Christian terrorists" do as much damage as "Islamic terrorists". If the "dems" were not trying to trivialize the islamic terrorists, the numbers would "clarify" the whole subject. Why won't dems state the facts, using numbers? This is the number we "know" have been killed by islamic terrorists in the last x years; this is the number we "know" have been killed by Christian terrorists in the last x years. Look, at the numbers; they are comparable or NOT. According to many dems, the numbers are the similar (but they won't use "actual" numbers). That is "trivializing/ignoring" islamic terrorists.

I don't need a side by side comparison, I've already stated that I beleive there is a greater threat coming from the Radical Islamics. I can only answer for myself and my beliefs. I have never implied the above (in bold type) as it applies to the modern world or current history.

Who exactly is saying that "Christian terrorists" do as much damage as "Islamic terrorists"?

Rosie Odonell, for one, on her show, and many, many others. By not using numbers and implying that islamic terrorists are "matched" by Christian terrorists (by any time islamic terrorists are mentioned, changing the subject to Eric Rudolf, Timmothy McViegh, and Terry Nichols), islamic terrorists are being "trivialized". When asked, you did clarify your statements, thank you. You are rare!

I don't think Rosie speaks for the entire Democratic Party, but I do understand what you mean.

 

[logical4u]

So, you think pointing out people B doing something bad trivializes what People A are doing bad? Isn't that what little kids do? How do the grownups buy THAT excuse?

Still waiting for you to discuss Abraham and his offspring .....

nanny, nanny, boo, boo

If you will recall, I am the one who answered your questions on Isaac, Jacob (Israel)....but if you've got more....go right ahead and ask them.

I apologize, I confuse you and rsmith.

Back to your question: if the subject is an issue with "islamic terrorists", and someone wants to discuss "Christian terrorist", they are trying to "NOT discuss the topic" (in many circles that is known as trivializing or ignoring the topic).

If they want to discuss issues with Christian terrorists, they could start their own thread, and all of those people that want to join that discussion would join them.

As far as Jacob, I believe we left off with the greeting that Esua gave Jacob and his wives after fleeing his father in law, after working for him for at least twenty one years. Are you aware of that greeting? Does that mean they were "peaceful" or "not"? Are you aware that Esua was living in the same area as Ishmael (implying they got along, quite well)?

 

[Uncensored2008]

I knew you couldn't prove your lies....

What a silly little child you are.

 

[Uncensored2008]

So, you think pointing out people B doing something bad trivializes what People A are doing bad? Isn't that what little kids do? How do the grownups buy THAT excuse?

Being that you have the brains and maturity of a backwards first grader, you should grasp the whole "SHE DID IT TOO!" technique.

Another lefty weighs in...

“Many of the Palestinian people are jewish and became christian after Israel stole their land and homes. They were dark skinned, and so driven out of their homes by a cheney-ized Judeo Christian Bushite America. the jewish american socialists are sending a flotilla from america to break the blockade of the anti-semitic zionists in Gaza! Zionists are German. weird hybrid. In order to defeat euro socialism, Hitler leveraged the rich jewish industrialists against the working class jews. The Russian accounts say that the last trains to Auschwitz were first class, as that is all the leverage left to the jewish oligarchs within the ‘reich’, (other than the jews like Hitler, Goebbels, and Himmler at the top). The scientists of the Reich successfully created a mutant human–a hybrid of Jewish mentality and German Resolve, the Zionist– He who broke the back of the labor movements and socialism,— which is the goal of National Socialism—(different word for the American Southern Confederacy-the one Anne Coulter loves).” Roseanne Barr

Source: RoseanneWorld.com

 

[bodecea]

I knew you couldn't prove your lies....

What a silly little child you are.

Well...that certainly is a firm debate point you are presenting, isn't it?

 

[bodecea]

So, you think pointing out people B doing something bad trivializes what People A are doing bad? Isn't that what little kids do? How do the grownups buy THAT excuse?

Being that you have the brains and maturity of a backwards first grader, you should grasp the whole "SHE DID IT TOO!" technique.

Another lefty weighs in...

“Many of the Palestinian people are jewish and became christian after Israel stole their land and homes. They were dark skinned, and so driven out of their homes by a cheney-ized Judeo Christian Bushite America. the jewish american socialists are sending a flotilla from america to break the blockade of the anti-semitic zionists in Gaza! Zionists are German. weird hybrid. In order to defeat euro socialism, Hitler leveraged the rich jewish industrialists against the working class jews. The Russian accounts say that the last trains to Auschwitz were first class, as that is all the leverage left to the jewish oligarchs within the ‘reich’, (other than the jews like Hitler, Goebbels, and Himmler at the top). The scientists of the Reich successfully created a mutant human–a hybrid of Jewish mentality and German Resolve, the Zionist– He who broke the back of the labor movements and socialism,— which is the goal of National Socialism—(different word for the American Southern Confederacy-the one Anne Coulter loves).” Roseanne Barr

Source: RoseanneWorld.com

How well does that work for the Adults? Not you...the adults.

 

[Wicked Jester]

BS! Where have I EVER said that?

Yawn..

You know these threads stay on the board, doncha?

http://www.usmessageboard.com/polit...ant-the-us-to-spend-on-israeli-defense-9.html

You just lie and lie and lie, don't you? Getting to the point that no one who isn't a partisan hack believes anything you say anymore.

ROFL

Irony indeed.

You know bod, if you don't want to get grouped with the Nazis, then hanging with Lasher and Dr. Drock ain't a great idea..

I knew you couldn't prove your lies....more and more people here are getting to see what your idea of "integrity" is....lie and lie and lie. That's your integrity.

You were exposed in this thread by your own twisting and lying about Allies words.

All you have is, lie and lie and lie.......Too fuckin' funny!

YOU are the last person who should ever question ANY other posters integrity.

Christ, you are one loony liberal idiot!

 

[Uncensored2008]

Well...that certainly is a firm debate point you are presenting, isn't it?

Certainly ahead of anything you have yet offered - which consists entirely of holding your breath until you turn blue....