It seems that when we actually take a look at what happens to real people who find themselves on a grid that his heavy with renewables, we see that energy costs increase, household poverty risks increase, and household incomes decline. Why do all liberal ideas result in more poverty? Why can they not see that their nutty ideas invariably hurt the people who can least afford their madness?
https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S0360544218325738
Energy that produces CO2, on the other hand lets to economic prosperity and industrialization.
https://www.researchgate.net/public...al_development_and_energy_policy_perspectives
reposted from
NoTricksZone: "Not here to worship what is known, but to question it" – Jacob Bronowski. Climate and energy news from Germany in English – by Pierre L. Gosselin
FACT CHECK: Did 58 Scientific Papers Published in 2017 Say Global Warming is a Myth?
On 6 June 2017, Breitbart News ran an
article titled “‘Global Warming’ Is a Myth, Say 58 Scientific Papers in 2017”. This article, which is in essence merely a link to a post from a blog that goes by the name “No Tricks Zone” and some added musings on “grant-troughing scientists,” “huxter politicians,” “scaremongering green activists,” and “brainwashed mainstream media environmental correspondents,” claims that this ragtag collection of studies proves that the long-standing scientific consensus on climate change is nothing but a myth.
The
blog post Breitbart linked to is a list of 80 graphs (so many graphs!) taken from 58 studies. The analysis of the findings presented by
No Tricks Zone is crude, misinformed, and riddled with errors.
The Title is misleading since No Tricks Zone didn't write that title, this is what they wrote:
80 Graphs From 58 New (2017) Papers Invalidate Claims Of Unprecedented Global-Scale Modern Warming
Breitbart/Delingpole wrote the misleading title, to which Snopes cried over. They also missed the AUTHOR of the No Tricks Zone blog post
statement about the misleading title:
"
Kenneth Richard 8. June 2017
The Breitbart headline – which is obviously not something we can control here – purposefully sensationalizes the content of this article by using the phrase “Global Warming Is A Myth.” Apparently it worked, as there are now about 10,000 comments logged at Breitbart…and nearly 20,000 shares and re-tweets here...…"
Did 58 Scientific Papers Published in 2017 Say Global Warming is a Myth? That was Delingpole/Breitbart who made that title.
========================
What Snopes did was illegal since they used the webpage capture method to prevent anyone from going directly to the actual websites:
"On 6 June 2017, Breitbart News ran an
article titled “‘Global Warming’ Is a Myth, Say 58 Scientific Papers in 2017”. This article, which is in essence merely a link to a post from a blog that goes by the name “No Tricks Zone” and some added musings on “grant-troughing scientists,” “huxter politicians,” “scaremongering green activists,” and “brainwashed mainstream media environmental correspondents,” claims that this ragtag collection of studies proves that the long-standing scientific consensus on climate change is nothing but a myth.
The
blog post Breitbart linked to is a list of 80 graphs (so many graphs!) taken from 58 studies. The analysis of the findings presented by No Tricks Zone is crude, misinformed, and riddled with errors."
Both links listed in the quote doesn't go the actual websites at all, it is a WEBPAGE capture, which prevent real traffic, a dishonest tactic.Make it harder to see what Snopes left out in their dishonest "investigation".
====================
Now this section from
SNOPES is so dishonest that they destroyed their entire claim because No Tricks Zone didn't make those conclusions at all:
"This is false. We reached out to many of the authors of the studies included on this list via email to see if they agreed with Breitbart and No Tricks Zone’s analysis. While not everyone we reached out to responded
, not a single researcher that we spoke to agreed with Breitbart’s assessment,
and most were shocked when we told them that their work was presented as evidence for that claim."
black and red bolding mine
Notice it is what BREITBART said, NOT No Tricks Zone who presented a very different conclusion, but Snopes was carful in omitting that part.
This is the beginning of each article below, notice how different they are from each other?
Breitbart:
“Global warming” is a myth — so say 80 graphs from 58 peer-reviewed scientific papers published in 2017.
In other words, the so-called “Consensus” on global warming is a massive lie. And
Donald Trump was quite right to quit the Paris agreement which pretended that the massive lie was true.
By “global warming” these papers don’t, of course, mean the mild warming of around 0.8 degrees Celsius that the planet has experienced since the middle of the 19th century as the world crawled out of the Little Ice Age. Pretty much everyone, alarmists and skeptics alike, is agreed on that.
Rather, they mean “global warming” in the sense that is most commonly used today by grant-troughing scientists, and huxter politicians, and scaremongering green activists, and brainwashed mainstream media (MSM) environmental correspondents. “Global warming” as in the scary, historically unprecedented, primarily man-made phenomenon which we must address urgently before the icecaps melt and the Pacific islands disappear beneath the waves and all the baby polar bears drown.
What all these papers argue in their different ways is that the alarmist version of global warming — aka Catastrophic Anthropogenic Global Warming (CAGW) — is a fake artefact."
No Tricks Zone:
"Last year there were
at least 60 peer-reviewed papers published in scientific journals demonstrating that
Today’s Warming Isn’t Global, Unprecedented, Or Remarkable.
.
Just within the last 5 months, 58 more papers and 80 new graphs have been published that continue to undermine the popularized conception of a slowly cooling Earth temperature history followed by a dramatic hockey-stick-shaped uptick, or
an especially unusual global-scale warming during modern times.
.
Yes, some regions of the Earth have been warming in recent decades or at some point in the last 100 years. Some regions have been cooling for decades at a time. And many regions have shown no significant net changes or trends in either direction relative to the last few hundred to thousands of years.
.
Succinctly, then, scientists publishing in peer-reviewed journals have increasingly affirmed that
there is nothing historically unprecedented or remarkable about today’s climate when viewed in the context of long-term natural variability"
===================
Snopes too often sucks and dishonest in their so called investigations, it wasn't hard to notice because I did something YOU didn't do, look through the stuff.
You have been snookered, Penelope!
