Why Conservatives Are Obsessed With This Bad College Essay

[DonGlock26]

It's an example of writing what you want vs what the question asked. I dont think academic exercises are your strong suit.

Oh it is. I just know the difference between geology and
gender studies.

 

[Fort Fun Indiana]

Oh it is. I just know the difference between geology and
gender studies.

No you don't. You MAGA folks know exactly jack shit about either topic.

 

[DonGlock26]

No you don't. You MAGA folks know exactly jack shit about either topic.

What is a woman?

 

[DonGlock26]

The same is true of Donald Trump.

Categorically untrue.

 

[Fort Fun Indiana]

What is a woman?

In what context? Thats what a halfway educated and intelligent person would say.

You people are too used to haing around dumb peole and watching dumb people like Charlie Kirk and Matt Walsh.

 

[DonGlock26]

In what context? Thats what a halfway educated and intelligent person would say.

You people are too used to haing around dumb peole and watching dumb people like Charlie Kirk and Matt Walsh.

You can't answer?

 

[Fort Fun Indiana]

You can't answer?

And this is the response expected from those of low IQ and low ability.

 

[DonGlock26]

And this is the response expected from those of low IQ and low ability.

Is this a woman?


How about this one?

 

[pknopp]

And this is the response expected from those of low IQ and low ability.

Low IQ is those who didn't understand Jackson answer. She was asked to comment on a potential case before the courts. She said she would not commit to an answer until she heard such a case.

A position I have supported every single nominee in taking. When others were asked about RvW and precedent, they should have gave the same kind of answer and they wouldn't have had to lie.

 

[Fort Fun Indiana]

View attachment 1191441

Is this a woman?


How about this one?

View attachment 1191443

Oops, I broke Don again. Now he is rocking back and forth and vomiting Charkie Kirk soundbytes.

 

[Fort Fun Indiana]

Low IQ is those who didn't understand Jackson answer. She was asked to comment on a potential case before the courts. She said she would not commit to an answer until she heard such a case.

A position I have supported every single nominee in taking. When others were asked about RvW and precedent, they should have gave the same kind of answer and they wouldn't have had to lie.

But they did, and now we have a corrupt SCOTUS.

 

[DonGlock26]

Oops, I broke Don again. Now he is rocking back and forth and vomiting Charkie Kirk soundbytes.

Still no answer.

 

[Fort Fun Indiana]

Poor Don watches a bit too much YouTube and thinks he found an awesome point, because he lives in a bubble with no educated, informed, or ethical people in it.

 

[Independent thinker]

University of Oklahoma junior Samantha Fulnecky has alleged that her First Amendment right to religious freedom is being infringed after her psychology professor gave her an “F” for a paper on the gender norms of middle school students.

Mel Curth, the graduate teaching assistant who graded Fulnecky’s paper, gave the student a failing grade. Curth, who is a trans woman, wrote that the problem was not with the student’s personal views but because her essay “does not answer the questions for this assignment, contradicts itself, heavily uses personal ideology over empirical evidence in a scientific class, and is at times offensive.” A second instructor agreed with Curth’s findings.

After Fulnecky filed a complaint with the school, the right-wing grievance industry went to work.

Why conservatives are obsessed with this bad college essay

Explaining the Right is a weekly series that looks at what the right wing is currently obsessing over, how it influences politics—and why you need to know. Conservatives have spent the last week ...

www.dailykos.com

Practicing religious freedom from education. An actual college course the university. No brains required.

It wasn't even an "F". It was a zero. Proof positive that the professor was nothing but a woke liberal professor.

 

[Rogue AI]

As if you know anything about any of that. Youur opinions are worthless.

Awww, how sad, you know that your fantasy 'gender' crap has no scientific basis so you deflect. How pathetic of you.

 

[Rogue AI]

It wasn't even an "F". It was a zero. Proof positive that the professor was nothing but a woke liberal professor.

That's one of the bigger issues, not just a failing grade, but a grade that is the same as not having done the assignment at all. This intolerant liberal trash have no place in classrooms.

 

[Rogue AI]

There was a time (not that long ago) that science didn't understand carbon dating.

There will never be a time when pretending a boy is a girl will make it so.

 

[pknopp]

There will never be a time when pretending a boy is a girl will make it so.

But we almost certainly will understand why one feels that way.

 

[Rogue AI]

But we almost certainly will understand why one feels that way.

That is neither quantifiable nor scientific in the least, a bunch of subjective nonsense paraded around as something it is not.

 

[pknopp]

That is neither quantifiable nor scientific in the least, a bunch of subjective nonsense paraded around as something it is not.

B.S. Same was said about going to the moon.

To me it's crazy that people can understand that things in the womb can go wrong so that the sex of a newborn baby is indeterminate but it's somehow impossible for other things to go wrong.