Slade3200
Diamond Member
- Jan 13, 2016
- 71,342
- 18,278
- 2,190
Fraud would have been proven?! They weren’t even claiming fraud in court!!Show us those items. Saying the courts refused to hear the evidence means nothing. We know why did not. Fraud would have been proven.He knows this, I actually dug into a few items in that list and challenge the validity. What do you think Lastamender did? Changed the subject then ran away. And now he’s back again posting the same shit as “evidence” what a joke.You don’t have evidenceMaybe if you had evidence like I do that massive fraud happened. There is your answer.Why are you asking me when it has already worked on you? I am not like you.No thanks, I will just keep letting you know there was massive fraud.
Yea, you already said that a few times.
If I followed you around and kept telling you that the moon is made of cheese, would you be more inclined to believe it if I kept repeating myself?
Yea I didn’t think you would answer that question either.![]()
- Overall, we rate Here is the Evidence Right Biased and Questionable based on the publication of election fraud misinformation, the use of poor sources, and a complete lack of transparency.
![]()

In Court, Trump's Lawyers Aren't Claiming 'Massive' Fraud
While the President and his lawyers make histrionic claims in public, the campaign's legal filings are narrow in scope