Benghazi is a nonissue this election and the president's handling of this disaster is more than he needed to clinch the 2nd term. Romney acts completely lost/clueless all of a sudden.
Dear HT: if this indicates Obama's strategy (to avoid early intervention, wait until after it is over, then do accountability afterwards) we are in deep trouble!
I was hoping to work with fellow Democrats to save a national historic site from destruction.
I live in a district with 8 remaining African American historic churches, built by Freed Slaves as the only landmark of its kind in the entire country. But the Democrat administration seems to follow this same protocol of waiting until AFTER the damage is done, and then saying it's too late, there is nothing they can do. There is not enough proactive commitment to protect national interests in advance while we had the chance, only damage assessment afterwards.
If the Democrats are too afraid to take chances of stirring things or overstepping bounds,
and prefer to wait until after the damage is done, this explains why I am getting nowhere.
Also, HT if you plan to vote Democrat, are YOU willing to pay the damages and debts incurred by the Democrat party and leadership in cases like this?
I wonder how much of this passive or negligent decision-making strategy is at the expense of others, and that is why it keeps happening! If the cost of such negligence was borne by the Parties who make them, would there be more incentive to change strategies? Or to delegate authority to people willing to make the tough calls, in order to prevent the risk of incurring irreparable costs afterwards? How can you accept responsibilities of office, or VOTE for these people, and then not take responsibility for the policies and decisions?