Why Assume He Killed Himself?

I asked earlier how someone kills themselves and then manages to detonate a bomb, unless it was on a timer of some kind or remote detonated. I haven't heard any of that type of info coming out.
I suspect he just lit the fuses on some of the fireworks, which caused a chain reaction.

 
I suspect he just lit the fuses on some of the fireworks, which caused a chain reaction.


That's not the point , the point is why would a trained special forces person makes such a crude explosion?
 
Apparently he was also MAGA, through and through.
In 2024 it is far more strategically sound to violently attack your own side than to attack your enemy.

To a Green Beret, this tactic would make perfect sense.

We'll never know for sure...but that's where I'd put my money.
 
Last edited:
That's not the point , the point is why would a trained special forces person makes such a crude explosion?
Because his intention wasn't to kill anyone but himself.

Fireworks and camping fuel are perfect.. Lots of sound and fury, signifying nothing. Big boom, big flame, no shrapnel. Dude constructed the world's largest flash bang.

Blaze of glory.

Everyone knows his name.

No one killed but him.

To me it makes perfect sense...and I was loudly making this same argument...that we are expected to believe a trained SF soldier basically threw a bunch of incendiaries in the back of a hatchback... last night in a different thread.

But adding the infidelity and estrangement from wife and child to the recipe, and a new and different kind of batter is batter is formed.

Divorce this from the other attack.

The other attack only interacts with this one secondarily... Perhaps as a catalyst that expanded the scope of the spectacle of the suicide plan.

Like I said. The greatest narcissistic suicide since Socrates.

If you knew some of these SF guys, it would make sense to you too.
 
Last edited:
An interesting thought....Tesla withstood a bomb blast and didn't explode outward.
It mostly blew upward, quite a testament for the durability of the vehicle.
I have a feeling that a commercial may come from this footage.

Side note......his main squeeze (wife) was giving him the heave-ho with divorce papers
that he received less than a week prior. Might be a considering factor.
Yep. She said they had a fight at Christmas about his infidelity and she had not seen him since.
 
You see the problem is with this bunch in charge nobody could have confidence in any investigation.... We'll have the adults in charge soon 👍🏼
We can only hope. I see posts on USMB and social media that many FBI agents will resign if Kash Patel is confirmed FBI director. That is the best possible thing that could happen because all those resigning will be deep state operatives.
 
So the Green Beret identified as the Vegas truck bomber was burnt "beyond recognition" and his weapons were disfigured but his military ID was intact?


Just like>>>
1735938145780.webp


~S~
 
good thinking

I think dude killed himself. I think he was supposed to drive that electric vehicle into the front of the Trump Hotel and he just could not do it consciously, so he instead shot himself and the explosives went off.

I don't know for sure, I'm just guessing. Uni-bombers are supposed to blow themselves up not shoot themselves (Las Vegas) nor get shot (New Orleans).
right, sorta---virtually simultaneously----detonated and shot himself-----
to go out in a blaze of glory and get short circuited to Jannah---
a kind of simulation of a bomb belt death
 
Impact of Recent Incidents on U.S. Defense Budgets

The recent violent incidents, including the explosion outside the Trump International Hotel and the truck attack in New Orleans, could have significant implications for U.S. defense budgets. Here’s an analysis of how these events might influence defense spending:

1. Increased Security Measures: Following violent events, there is often a heightened demand for security enhancements at public venues and critical infrastructure. This could lead to increased funding for local and federal law enforcement agencies, which may subsequently request additional resources from the federal government. As a result, the Department of Defense (DoD) might see a shift in budget allocations to support these security initiatives.

2. Focus on Counterterrorism: The classification of the New Orleans attack as an act of terrorism could prompt a reevaluation of counterterrorism strategies and funding. The U.S. government may allocate more resources to intelligence, surveillance, and reconnaissance operations to prevent similar incidents in the future. This could lead to an increase in the defense budget as the DoD seeks to enhance its capabilities in this area.

3. Public Sentiment and Political Pressure: Violent incidents often shift public sentiment towards a demand for increased safety and security. Politicians may respond to this sentiment by advocating for higher defense budgets to address perceived threats. This political pressure can result in Congress approving larger appropriations for defense spending, especially if there is a bipartisan consensus on the need for enhanced national security.

4. Global Military Engagement: The ongoing geopolitical tensions, particularly with Russia and the implications of the Ukraine conflict, may also influence defense budgets. If the U.S. perceives a need to bolster its military presence or capabilities in response to these threats, it could lead to significant increases in defense spending. The recent incidents may serve as a catalyst for discussions on military readiness and the need for a robust defense posture.

5. Long-term Budget Planning: The incidents could impact long-term defense budget planning, as the DoD may need to reassess its priorities and allocate funds accordingly. This could involve reallocating resources from other areas of the military budget to address immediate security concerns or emerging threats.

Conclusion

In summary, the violent events could lead to increased defense spending in the U.S. through heightened security measures, a focus on counterterrorism, political pressure for enhanced safety, and a reevaluation of military readiness in the face of global threats. The interplay between public sentiment, political action, and defense strategy will likely shape the future of U.S. defense budgets in response to these incidents.

VERY SPECIAL MISSIONS ACCOMPLISHED! I still don't trust the Biden's FBI( or Pentagon ).

Yes, the enemy within or the Deep State exists. lol. :)
 
We can only hope. I see posts on USMB and social media that many FBI agents will resign if Kash Patel is confirmed FBI director. That is the best possible thing that could happen because all those resigning will be deep state operatives.
Don't let the door hit them in the ass on the way out the door 👍🏼
 
Last edited:
The problem I have with this scenario is the type of "explosives" used. Fireworks ,gas cans and camping fuel. The guy was an Operator in the SF regardless of his MOS those guys cross train.
 
The problem I have with this scenario is the type of "explosives" used. Fireworks ,gas cans and camping fuel. The guy was an Operator in the SF regardless of his MOS those guys cross train.


The first place to start is that was obviously not in a normal mental state.
 
In 2024 it is far more strategically sound to violently attack your own side than to attack your enemy.

To a Green Beret, this tactic would make perfect sense.

We'll never know for sure...but that's where I'd put my money.
Well I can't really get with that weird, madeup nonsense.
 
Back
Top Bottom