Why Aren't the Republicans Calling Witnesses to Defend Trump?

[Syriusly]

Fascinating responses from the Trumpettes.

Most just hurl insults- because they love to imitate their Orange Messiah.
A few of them just lie.- because they love to emulate their lying Orange Messiah.

Not a one has actually answered the question.

Because we all know why the GOP doesn't want Pompeo, Pence, Giuliani or Mulvaney in public, under oath, on the witness stand.

 

[bripat9643]

So far all Republicans have done is try to smear the witnesses before the House. The witnesses the Republicans want to call have no knowledge of Trump's activities in Ukraine.

Why don't the Republicans call Pompeo?

Why don't the Republicans call Giuliani?

Why don't the Republicans call Pence?

Why don't the Republicans call Mulvaney?

These are all people with first hand knowledge of what happened- if there was no bribery attempt- they could testify as to their first hand knowledge that there was no bribery attempt.

If the President wasn't demanding an investigation into Biden's in exchange for arms or for a visit in the White House- these people could make that absolutely clear- easily.
'
Why don't Republicans want to mount a defense with witnesses who can refute those who say there was a quid pro quo for Trump's personal benefit?

Are you serious?...Schiff's unfair rules forbid the GOP from calling witnesses that they would like to hear from...you were kidding right?...because if you didn't know that you shouldn't be commenting because you don't know anything....

Nothing is stopping the GOP from putting Pompeo, Giuliani, Pence or Mulvaney on their witness list.

Do you really thing Schiff would object to any of those- all of whom are directly and specifically involved- being called?

Republicans in dark over GOP witness list awaiting Schiff approval

Giuliani is Trump's lawyer. Attorney-client privilege prevents him from testifying. Pompeo and Pence are not fact witnesses. They didn't see any of the events under discussion.

 

[Syriusly]

So far all Republicans have done is try to smear the witnesses before the House. The witnesses the Republicans want to call have no knowledge of Trump's activities in Ukraine.

Why don't the Republicans call Pompeo?

Why don't the Republicans call Giuliani?

Why don't the Republicans call Pence?

Why don't the Republicans call Mulvaney?

These are all people with first hand knowledge of what happened- if there was no bribery attempt- they could testify as to their first hand knowledge that there was no bribery attempt.

If the President wasn't demanding an investigation into Biden's in exchange for arms or for a visit in the White House- these people could make that absolutely clear- easily.
'
Why don't Republicans want to mount a defense with witnesses who can refute those who say there was a quid pro quo for Trump's personal benefit?

Are you serious?...Schiff's unfair rules forbid the GOP from calling witnesses that they would like to hear from...you were kidding right?...because if you didn't know that you shouldn't be commenting because you don't know anything....

Nothing is stopping the GOP from putting Pompeo, Giuliani, Pence or Mulvaney on their witness list.

Do you really thing Schiff would object to any of those- all of whom are directly and specifically involved- being called?

Republicans in dark over GOP witness list awaiting Schiff approval

Giuliani is Trump's lawyer. Attorney-client privilege prevents him from testifying. Pompeo and Pence are not fact witnesses. They didn't see any of the events under discussion.

None of that prevents the Republicans from calling them as witnesses.

But I do like that you are in agreement that Giuliani pushing Ukraine to investigate the Biden's was for the President's personal benefit.

As far as Pompeo and Pence- they know more about what happened in Trump's administration than Hunter Biden- and that doesn't stop them from calling Hunter Biden.
More specifically- they both have more direct knowledge than Morrison who is on the GOP's list.

And Mulvaney was the one who ordered the funds withheld. He certainly can go before Congress and under oath tell the House the President's real reasons for ordering the funds withheld.

Mulvaney could put an end to the entire investigation.

 

[Nostra]

Fascinating responses from the Trumpettes.

Most just hurl insults- because they love to imitate their Orange Messiah.
A few of them just lie.- because they love to emulate their lying Orange Messiah.

Not a one has actually answered the question.

Because we all know why the GOP doesn't want Pompeo, Pence, Giuliani or Mulvaney in public, under oath, on the witness stand.

I answered it. Learn to read.

 

[Rambunctious]

None of that prevents the Republicans from calling them as witnesses

Yes it does....Schiff will not let them call just whomever they want so that leaves only people who would be a waste of their time to call...its not that hard to understand....

 

[Nostra]

So far all Republicans have done is try to smear the witnesses before the House. The witnesses the Republicans want to call have no knowledge of Trump's activities in Ukraine.

Why don't the Republicans call Pompeo?

Why don't the Republicans call Giuliani?

Why don't the Republicans call Pence?

Why don't the Republicans call Mulvaney?

These are all people with first hand knowledge of what happened- if there was no bribery attempt- they could testify as to their first hand knowledge that there was no bribery attempt.

If the President wasn't demanding an investigation into Biden's in exchange for arms or for a visit in the White House- these people could make that absolutely clear- easily.
'
Why don't Republicans want to mount a defense with witnesses who can refute those who say there was a quid pro quo for Trump's personal benefit?

Pencil Neck Hitler hasn't let them.

please keep up.

When did the GOP request them?

I am trying to keep up, but I just can't find your flying unicorn.

They submitted their list. Lil Hitler sets the schedule.Get educated

 

[Wyatt earp]

All of Comrade Donald's impeachment problems stem directly from the fact he cannot accept that Putin helped him get elected.

He deserves whatever happens to him.

By memes?

Good gawd man

 

[bripat9643]

So far all Republicans have done is try to smear the witnesses before the House. The witnesses the Republicans want to call have no knowledge of Trump's activities in Ukraine.

Why don't the Republicans call Pompeo?

Why don't the Republicans call Giuliani?

Why don't the Republicans call Pence?

Why don't the Republicans call Mulvaney?

These are all people with first hand knowledge of what happened- if there was no bribery attempt- they could testify as to their first hand knowledge that there was no bribery attempt.

If the President wasn't demanding an investigation into Biden's in exchange for arms or for a visit in the White House- these people could make that absolutely clear- easily.
'
Why don't Republicans want to mount a defense with witnesses who can refute those who say there was a quid pro quo for Trump's personal benefit?

Are you serious?...Schiff's unfair rules forbid the GOP from calling witnesses that they would like to hear from...you were kidding right?...because if you didn't know that you shouldn't be commenting because you don't know anything....

Nothing is stopping the GOP from putting Pompeo, Giuliani, Pence or Mulvaney on their witness list.

Do you really thing Schiff would object to any of those- all of whom are directly and specifically involved- being called?

Republicans in dark over GOP witness list awaiting Schiff approval

Giuliani is Trump's lawyer. Attorney-client privilege prevents him from testifying. Pompeo and Pence are not fact witnesses. They didn't see any of the events under discussion.

None of that prevents the Republicans from calling them as witnesses.

But I do like that you are in agreement that Giuliani pushing Ukraine to investigate the Biden's was for the President's personal benefit.

As far as Pompeo and Pence- they know more about what happened in Trump's administration than Hunter Biden- and that doesn't stop them from calling Hunter Biden.
More specifically- they both have more direct knowledge than Morrison who is on the GOP's list.

And Mulvaney was the one who ordered the funds withheld. He certainly can go before Congress and under oath tell the House the President's real reasons for ordering the funds withheld.

Mulvaney could put an end to the entire investigation.

Why would Republicans want your witness list? Why shouldn't they get the witnesses they asked for? Can you explain that?

You're a fucking moron

 

[Wyatt earp]

All of Comrade Donald's impeachment problems stem directly from the fact he cannot accept that Putin helped him get elected.

He deserves whatever happens to him.

By memes?

Good gawd man

So your saying memes is that powerful?

 

[Dick Foster]

So far all Republicans have done is try to smear the witnesses before the House. The witnesses the Republicans want to call have no knowledge of Trump's activities in Ukraine.

Why don't the Republicans call Pompeo?

Why don't the Republicans call Giuliani?

Why don't the Republicans call Pence?

Why don't the Republicans call Mulvaney?

These are all people with first hand knowledge of what happened- if there was no bribery attempt- they could testify as to their first hand knowledge that there was no bribery attempt.

If the President wasn't demanding an investigation into Biden's in exchange for arms or for a visit in the White House- these people could make that absolutely clear- easily.
'
Why don't Republicans want to mount a defense with witnesses who can refute those who say there was a quid pro quo for Trump's personal benefit?

You dumbass, your post says you don't have the slightest friggin clue about what is going on. Try paying more attention to what's truly important than trivial nonsense like sports and reality TV from now on. And until you do, please refrain from voting in any election for anything or anyone.

Okay I will just put you down as another Trump Kultist who can't do anything more than insult others. Because of course you had no substantive reply.
I will let you go back to drooling over Rush and Hannity.

Ask a stupid question......

 

[Siete]

I listed the Trumpbot Republicans who ignored the subpoena requiring them to testify.

they refuse to testify -

so STFU about witnesses.

 

[Wyatt earp]

Fascinating responses from the Trumpettes.

Most just hurl insults- because they love to imitate their Orange Messiah.
A few of them just lie.- because they love to emulate their lying Orange Messiah.

Not a one has actually answered the question.

Because we all know why the GOP doesn't want Pompeo, Pence, Giuliani or Mulvaney in public, under oath, on the witness stand.

Why are you so racist against orange people?

 

[Rambunctious]

Nothing is stopping the GOP from putting Pompeo, Giuliani, Pence or Mulvaney on their witness list.

Schiff is stopping them and if he allows one of them he dictates what can be asked making them useless...
Schiff won't even let the republicans speak in a point of order....that is a long standing rule never breached before...the dems will pay dearly for this clown show....

 

[Wyatt earp]

I listed the Trumpbot Republicans who ignored the subpoena requiring them to testify.

they refuse to testify -

so STFU about witnesses.

Three branches of government, asshat

 

[Dick Foster]

Fascinating responses from the Trumpettes.

Most just hurl insults- because they love to imitate their Orange Messiah.
A few of them just lie.- because they love to emulate their lying Orange Messiah.

Not a one has actually answered the question.

Because we all know why the GOP doesn't want Pompeo, Pence, Giuliani or Mulvaney in public, under oath, on the witness stand.

I answered it. Learn to read.

It's doubtful that he can. Oterwise the question wouldn't be so stupid, indicating complete cluelessness.

 

[bripat9643]

I listed the Trumpbot Republicans who ignored the subpoena requiring them to testify.

they refuse to testify -

so STFU about witnesses.

Why would they testify at this circus? That would only lend it an undeserved credibility.

 

[Siete]

I listed the Trumpbot Republicans who ignored the subpoena requiring them to testify.

they refuse to testify -

so STFU about witnesses.

Three branches of government, asshat

Here are the witnesses in Trump's administration who have defied subpoenas in the inquiry.

• Mick Mulvaney, acting chief of staff
• Robert Blair, assistant to the president and senior adviser to the acting chief of staff
• John Eisenberg, legal adviser at National Security Council (NSC)
• Michael Ellis, deputy NSC legal adviser
• Brian McCormack, associate director at the Office of Management and Budget (OMB)
• Michael Duffey, associate director at OMB
• Wells Griffith, special assistant to the president and senior director at NSC
• T. Ulrich Brechbuhl, counselor at the Department of State
• Russell Vought, acting director at OMB
• Charles Kupperman, former deputy assistant to the president for national security affair

 

[Syriusly]

None of that prevents the Republicans from calling them as witnesses

Yes it does....Schiff will not let them call just whomever they want so that leaves only people who would be a waste of their time to call...its not that hard to understand....

Why do you think Pompeo and Mulvaney and Giuliani would be a waste of time?

 

[Siete]

I listed the Trumpbot Republicans who ignored the subpoena requiring them to testify.

they refuse to testify -

so STFU about witnesses.

Why would they testify at this circus? That would only lend it an undeserved credibility.

Trumpbots are demanding witnesses thats why

ya f'n idiot

 

[Syriusly]

I listed the Trumpbot Republicans who ignored the subpoena requiring them to testify.

they refuse to testify -

so STFU about witnesses.

Why would they testify at this circus? That would only lend it an undeserved credibility.

Why would they testify to refute all of the testimony against Trump?

Why wouldn't they?

If what Sondland and Taylor and the others have said is not true- why don't they get up there and tell us?