Why Aren't the Republicans Calling Witnesses to Defend Trump?

[Mac-7]

So far all Republicans have done is try to smear the witnesses before the House. The witnesses the Republicans want to call have no knowledge of Trump's activities in Ukraine.

Why don't the Republicans call Pompeo?

Why don't the Republicans call Giuliani?

Why don't the Republicans call Pence?

Why don't the Republicans call Mulvaney?

These are all people with first hand knowledge of what happened- if there was no bribery attempt- they could testify as to their first hand knowledge that there was no bribery attempt.

If the President wasn't demanding an investigation into Biden's in exchange for arms or for a visit in the White House- these people could make that absolutely clear- easily.
'
Why don't Republicans want to mount a defense with witnesses who can refute those who say there was a quid pro quo for Trump's personal benefit?

Democrats are firing blanks

 

[Siete]

You did not watch the testimony, did you.

Vindman had first hand knowledge of the July 25 phone call.

You really should read the transcripts instead of parroting your propagandists.


The witnesses had first hand testimony of the events in Ukraine.

Don't worry. Witnesses who had first hand knowledge of Trump will be coming. Even though Trump is doing everything he can to obstruct them.

Vindman had first hand knowledge of the July 25 phone call.

Odd, I mentioned Kent, Taylor, and Yonovitch….

Actually you didn't.

You asked "Which witness had first hand knowledge?"

Don't lie when it is so easy to prove you lied. That's just stupid and makes you look desperate.

Hearsay evidence is inappropriate in an impeachment inquiry and your Schiffy knows it and is hard of hearing. Our guys are going to perform a surgery on his ears and he's going to hear it from the people of this country who no longer support Schiff's freedom to piss all over America and the Constitution. He's shilling for goddamn communism.

Biden is wanting for money to have. Hillary is wanting for more, more, more money. Pelosi has apparently expropriated $2.4 billion from Social Security to take away from seniors who paid in and give 100% of it to buying voters from everywhere else in the world but here.

You better make some decisions--are you going to abide by the voters in this country or are you going to continue this demonic trail to a civil war. You better think carefully because everybody in this nation suffers if you Democrats don't straighten up and fly right.

clinton won the popular vote

look up popular then STFU

NO you read the damn constitution and then YOU STFU, asshole.

TAKE IT EASY HOMBRE'


no need to show off how f'n stupid you really are right now - wait until around 5.

 

[basquebromance]

Trump should stop using the phrase "...in american history", because he clearly doesnt know enough about it, my friends!

 

[g5000]

Trump should stop using the phrase "...in american history", because he clearly doesnt know enough about it, my friends!

Well, he also knows his supporters know nothing about American history, too. He depends on their ignorance every day when he lies to them.

 

[beautress]

Schiff disregarded regular House rules by denying a Republican Congresswoman to speak, because he was afraid of what she was going to say. He's a coward for using his wrongful refusal to allow her to speak.

Congress will remain a two way street for both parties, or those blocking justice, namely Congressman Schiff, Congressman Pelosi, Congressman Nadler, Congressman Waters, et al. will have to live with their attempt to communize Congress behind bars for the duration of their miserable lives. Our President won by the rule of law to allow small states a voice in American politics. We're not about to turn over this country to the way California does things, which is to allow people to poop everywhere they wish like animals with no stopping them.

You Democrats aren't going to get very far trying to remove President Trump, because the nation decided on the voting College of Electors in order that a California poop system would not be allowed to bring California poop system shit to the rest of the country. Since you won't be nice about it, we'll have to persuade you Democrats with something a little more convincing than words and our case for the Constitution. Either back off our Congressmen immediately or you will pay the price for this attempt to make a Communist country out of America.

And we're going to reform the origin of this garbage by reforming the higher education system in this country so you hound dogs can't do any more brainwashing people to be morally deprived and communists all at the same time.

 

[beautress]

Odd, I mentioned Kent, Taylor, and Yonovitch….

Actually you didn't.

You asked "Which witness had first hand knowledge?"

Don't lie when it is so easy to prove you lied. That's just stupid and makes you look desperate.

Hearsay evidence is inappropriate in an impeachment inquiry and your Schiffy knows it and is hard of hearing. Our guys are going to perform a surgery on his ears and he's going to hear it from the people of this country who no longer support Schiff's freedom to piss all over America and the Constitution. He's shilling for goddamn communism.

Biden is wanting for money to have. Hillary is wanting for more, more, more money. Pelosi has apparently expropriated $2.4 billion from Social Security to take away from seniors who paid in and give 100% of it to buying voters from everywhere else in the world but here.

You better make some decisions--are you going to abide by the voters in this country or are you going to continue this demonic trail to a civil war. You better think carefully because everybody in this nation suffers if you Democrats don't straighten up and fly right.

clinton won the popular vote

look up popular then STFU

NO you read the damn constitution and then YOU STFU, asshole.

TAKE IT EASY HOMBRE'


no need to show off how f'n stupid you really are right now - wait until around 5.

Is that when Pelosi tells us what she is going to do with the 2.4 billion in Social Security she hijacked from the people a few days ago.

 

[22lcidw]

Trump should stop using the phrase "...in american history", because he clearly doesnt know enough about it, my friends!

Well, he also knows his supporters know nothing about American history, too. He depends on their ignorance every day when he lies to them.

We are begging you. Vote on the impeachment already. We do not need all of this reality TV snoozefest pablum. Progs are the ultimate method actors....Emote! Emote! So let us tally it up....Progs currently love the FBI and the CIA. We know that. But they currently hate Police and ICE. We know that. There is a lot more. We are supporting you for your vote on impeachment quickly if it must be done. Get it over with!!!! Please! So we can get the country running. You do not need this side show. Just vote. Like any minds were going to be changed anyway. Nixon is dead. The one way games are over.

 

[g5000]

Trump should stop using the phrase "...in american history", because he clearly doesnt know enough about it, my friends!

Well, he also knows his supporters know nothing about American history, too. He depends on their ignorance every day when he lies to them.

We are begging you. Vote on the impeachment already. We do not need all of this reality TV snoozefest pablum. Progs are the ultimate method actors....Emote! Emote! So let us tally it up....Progs currently love the FBI and the CIA. We know that. But they currently hate Police and ICE. We know that. There is a lot more. We are supporting you for your vote on impeachment quickly if it must be done. Get it over with!!!! Please! So we can get the country running. You do not need this side show. Just vote. Like any minds were going to be changed anyway. Nixon is dead. The one way games are over.

This is an open admission you are not the least bit interested in hearing all the facts.

You just confirmed why Trump is so easily able to con you damned fools.

 

[Wyatt earp]

So far all Republicans have done is try to smear the witnesses before the House. The witnesses the Republicans want to call have no knowledge of Trump's activities in Ukraine.

Why don't the Republicans call Pompeo?

Why don't the Republicans call Giuliani?

Why don't the Republicans call Pence?

Why don't the Republicans call Mulvaney?

These are all people with first hand knowledge of what happened- if there was no bribery attempt- they could testify as to their first hand knowledge that there was no bribery attempt.

If the President wasn't demanding an investigation into Biden's in exchange for arms or for a visit in the White House- these people could make that absolutely clear- easily.
'
Why don't Republicans want to mount a defense with witnesses who can refute those who say there was a quid pro quo for Trump's personal benefit?

Yeah, it's pretty funny that Jordan the Monkey whines that none of the witnesses so far had first hand knowledge (which is untrue), but he did not mention that Trump won't let the first hand witnesses testify. And as you aptly noted, the Republicans aren't calling them to testify.

That speaks volumes.

I wonder what Monkey Jordan's talking point will be when first hand witnesses testify and back up what the other witnesses have said.

Is hunter Biden your cocaine dealer?

Stop it already fag face.

Nice non sequitur. Got an actual answer? If Republican's primary issue is that none of the witnesses have first hand knowledge. Why not call those witnesses that DO? Why is the White House blocking testimony from those with first hand knowledge?

just these people -

Here are the witnesses in Trump's administration who have defied subpoenas in the inquiry.

• Mick Mulvaney, acting chief of staff
• Robert Blair, assistant to the president and senior adviser to the acting chief of staff
• John Eisenberg, legal adviser at National Security Council (NSC)
• Michael Ellis, deputy NSC legal adviser
• Brian McCormack, associate director at the Office of Management and Budget (OMB)
• Michael Duffey, associate director at OMB
• Wells Griffith, special assistant to the president and senior director at NSC
• T. Ulrich Brechbuhl, counselor at the Department of State
• Russell Vought, acting director at OMB
• Charles Kupperman, former deputy assistant to the president for national security affair

Are they all pirates now?

 

[Wyatt earp]

How do you prove a negative? The burden of proof is on the crazy political coup democrats. The president's strategy would be to confront the alleged "whistle blower" but strangely enough he(she) is nowhere to be found. The rest of the alleged "evidence" is nothing but heresay.

An impeachment isn't a fucking coup and in almost any hearings the other side can call witnesses.

Of course it is during an election year.


It's off the scales fucking crazy

 

[Syriusly]

So far all Republicans have done is try to smear the witnesses before the House. The witnesses the Republicans want to call have no knowledge of Trump's activities in Ukraine.

Why don't the Republicans call Pompeo?

Why don't the Republicans call Giuliani?

Why don't the Republicans call Pence?

Why don't the Republicans call Mulvaney?

These are all people with first hand knowledge of what happened- if there was no bribery attempt- they could testify as to their first hand knowledge that there was no bribery attempt.

If the President wasn't demanding an investigation into Biden's in exchange for arms or for a visit in the White House- these people could make that absolutely clear- easily.
'
Why don't Republicans want to mount a defense with witnesses who can refute those who say there was a quid pro quo for Trump's personal benefit?

You dumbass, your post says you don't have the slightest friggin clue about what is going on. Try paying more attention to what's truly important than trivial nonsense like sports and reality TV from now on. And until you do, please refrain from voting in any election for anything or anyone.

Okay I will just put you down as another Trump Kultist who can't do anything more than insult others. Because of course you had no substantive reply.
I will let you go back to drooling over Rush and Hannity.

 

[Syriusly]

So far all Republicans have done is try to smear the witnesses before the House. The witnesses the Republicans want to call have no knowledge of Trump's activities in Ukraine.

Why don't the Republicans call Pompeo?

Why don't the Republicans call Giuliani?

Why don't the Republicans call Pence?

Why don't the Republicans call Mulvaney?

These are all people with first hand knowledge of what happened- if there was no bribery attempt- they could testify as to their first hand knowledge that there was no bribery attempt.

If the President wasn't demanding an investigation into Biden's in exchange for arms or for a visit in the White House- these people could make that absolutely clear- easily.
'
Why don't Republicans want to mount a defense with witnesses who can refute those who say there was a quid pro quo for Trump's personal benefit?

If you have been watching the hearing, you would see that the Republicans can do nothing with Schiff in charge. He won't even let them finish their comments! Pure political theater.

I missed where Republican's proposed witness list included Pompeo, Giuliani, Pence and Mulvaney.

the Republicans do have a witness wish list. Are they now on it?

 

[Nostra]

So far all Republicans have done is try to smear the witnesses before the House. The witnesses the Republicans want to call have no knowledge of Trump's activities in Ukraine.

Why don't the Republicans call Pompeo?

Why don't the Republicans call Giuliani?

Why don't the Republicans call Pence?

Why don't the Republicans call Mulvaney?

These are all people with first hand knowledge of what happened- if there was no bribery attempt- they could testify as to their first hand knowledge that there was no bribery attempt.

If the President wasn't demanding an investigation into Biden's in exchange for arms or for a visit in the White House- these people could make that absolutely clear- easily.
'
Why don't Republicans want to mount a defense with witnesses who can refute those who say there was a quid pro quo for Trump's personal benefit?

Pencil Neck Hitler hasn't let them.

please keep up.

 

[g5000]

All of Comrade Donald's impeachment problems stem directly from the fact he cannot accept that Putin helped him get elected.

He deserves whatever happens to him.

 

[Syriusly]

So far all Republicans have done is try to smear the witnesses before the House. The witnesses the Republicans want to call have no knowledge of Trump's activities in Ukraine.

Why don't the Republicans call Pompeo?

Why don't the Republicans call Giuliani?

Why don't the Republicans call Pence?

Why don't the Republicans call Mulvaney?

These are all people with first hand knowledge of what happened- if there was no bribery attempt- they could testify as to their first hand knowledge that there was no bribery attempt.

If the President wasn't demanding an investigation into Biden's in exchange for arms or for a visit in the White House- these people could make that absolutely clear- easily.
'
Why don't Republicans want to mount a defense with witnesses who can refute those who say there was a quid pro quo for Trump's personal benefit?

Are you serious?...Schiff's unfair rules forbid the GOP from calling witnesses that they would like to hear from...you were kidding right?...because if you didn't know that you shouldn't be commenting because you don't know anything....

Nothing is stopping the GOP from putting Pompeo, Giuliani, Pence or Mulvaney on their witness list.

Do you really thing Schiff would object to any of those- all of whom are directly and specifically involved- being called?

Republicans in dark over GOP witness list awaiting Schiff approval

 

[Syriusly]

So far all Republicans have done is try to smear the witnesses before the House. The witnesses the Republicans want to call have no knowledge of Trump's activities in Ukraine.

Why don't the Republicans call Pompeo?

Why don't the Republicans call Giuliani?

Why don't the Republicans call Pence?

Why don't the Republicans call Mulvaney?

These are all people with first hand knowledge of what happened- if there was no bribery attempt- they could testify as to their first hand knowledge that there was no bribery attempt.

If the President wasn't demanding an investigation into Biden's in exchange for arms or for a visit in the White House- these people could make that absolutely clear- easily.
'
Why don't Republicans want to mount a defense with witnesses who can refute those who say there was a quid pro quo for Trump's personal benefit?

Pencil Neck Hitler hasn't let them.

please keep up.

When did the GOP request them?

I am trying to keep up, but I just can't find your flying unicorn.

 

[bripat9643]

So far all Republicans have done is try to smear the witnesses before the House. The witnesses the Republicans want to call have no knowledge of Trump's activities in Ukraine.

Why don't the Republicans call Pompeo?

Why don't the Republicans call Giuliani?

Why don't the Republicans call Pence?

Why don't the Republicans call Mulvaney?

These are all people with first hand knowledge of what happened- if there was no bribery attempt- they could testify as to their first hand knowledge that there was no bribery attempt.

If the President wasn't demanding an investigation into Biden's in exchange for arms or for a visit in the White House- these people could make that absolutely clear- easily.
'
Why don't Republicans want to mount a defense with witnesses who can refute those who say there was a quid pro quo for Trump's personal benefit?

They haven't been allowed to call their own witnesses, you fucking dumbass. Didn't you read about the list they submitted to Schiff-for-Brains?

 

[Syriusly]

So far all Republicans have done is try to smear the witnesses before the House. The witnesses the Republicans want to call have no knowledge of Trump's activities in Ukraine.

Why don't the Republicans call Pompeo?

Why don't the Republicans call Giuliani?

Why don't the Republicans call Pence?

Why don't the Republicans call Mulvaney?

These are all people with first hand knowledge of what happened- if there was no bribery attempt- they could testify as to their first hand knowledge that there was no bribery attempt.

If the President wasn't demanding an investigation into Biden's in exchange for arms or for a visit in the White House- these people could make that absolutely clear- easily.
'
Why don't Republicans want to mount a defense with witnesses who can refute those who say there was a quid pro quo for Trump's personal benefit?

Yeah, it's pretty funny that Jordan the Monkey whines that none of the witnesses so far had first hand knowledge (which is untrue), but he did not mention that Trump won't let the first hand witnesses testify. And as you aptly noted, the Republicans aren't calling them to testify.

That speaks volumes.

I wonder what Monkey Jordan's talking point will be when first hand witnesses testify and back up what the other witnesses have said.

Which witness had first hand knowledge?

So far, all I've heard is, "I was told"

All of them have had first hand knowledge about certain things.

But you know who would have first hand knowledge?

Why don't the Republicans call Pompeo?

Why don't the Republicans call Giuliani?

Why don't the Republicans call Pence?

Why don't the Republicans call Mulvaney?

These are all people with first hand knowledge of what happened- if there was no bribery attempt- they could testify as to their first hand knowledge that there was no bribery attempt.

If Trump is not guilty- why doesn't he want these guys- all of whom are in his pocket- up there testifying that he is no crook?

 

[bripat9643]

So far all Republicans have done is try to smear the witnesses before the House. The witnesses the Republicans want to call have no knowledge of Trump's activities in Ukraine.

Why don't the Republicans call Pompeo?

Why don't the Republicans call Giuliani?

Why don't the Republicans call Pence?

Why don't the Republicans call Mulvaney?

These are all people with first hand knowledge of what happened- if there was no bribery attempt- they could testify as to their first hand knowledge that there was no bribery attempt.

If the President wasn't demanding an investigation into Biden's in exchange for arms or for a visit in the White House- these people could make that absolutely clear- easily.
'
Why don't Republicans want to mount a defense with witnesses who can refute those who say there was a quid pro quo for Trump's personal benefit?

Are you serious?...Schiff's unfair rules forbid the GOP from calling witnesses that they would like to hear from...you were kidding right?...because if you didn't know that you shouldn't be commenting because you don't know anything....

Nothing is stopping the GOP from putting Pompeo, Giuliani, Pence or Mulvaney on their witness list.

Do you really thing Schiff would object to any of those- all of whom are directly and specifically involved- being called?

Republicans in dark over GOP witness list awaiting Schiff approval

The ones the Republicans want most are precisely the ones Schiff-for-Brains refuses to allow, you fucking moron.

 

[LordBrownTrout]

It's a lib carnival. It has been the lib mo since he was elected to impeachment him. Get your worthless vote over with and the Senate will kick it out.