The trillions going to the top 1% from the Bush Tax cuts.
The redistribution of wealth to the top 1%.
The fast growth of the wealth gap between the top 1% and everyone else.
Everything the Republicans said would lead to a fantastic growth in jobs.
So where are the jobs?
Why don't they see a connection between "supply and demand"?
Why don't they see a connection between education and jobs?
Why do they complain that government is not doing enough when they say government can't do anything?
Why do they blame Democrats? Aren't all these circumstances the result of six years of GOP policy under Bush?
Anyone?
How ******* hilarious. One the one hand liberals are arguing that unemployment IS going down, and on the other hand RDean is arguing that jobs aren't being created.
LOL My God, maybe you stupid liberals should compare notes every morning before you create your stupid , whiny threads.
Who said jobs weren't being created. Oh, that's right. One of those imaginary voices that tells you "things".
What I said is that with such a discrepancy in wealth and with the Bush Tax Cuts for the wealthy, unemployment should be at zero with everyone having well paying jobs. But that didn't happen. Republicans did everything they could to fulfill their policies and all evidence proves they failed.
Tell me, do you believe supply and demand is a ridiculous notion and moving the wealth of the nation to the top 1% creates jobs?
Who said the "Bush tax cuts" would result in nearly 0% unemployment and everyone having good paying jobs Dean?
The fact that you, and to be fair Obama bashers as well, ignore is that businesses will ALWAYS hire employees when they NEED those employees. Wal Mart just learned that lesson the hard way, they tried to have less employees than what sales dictated and it backfired as customers ran out in droves because shelves weren't being stocked, stores weren't being cleaned etc etc.
So Wal Mart hired extra help. They didn't do so because of tax cuts, or because Obama is a nice guy. They did so because their bottom line demanded it.
All your faux rage doesn't change this Dean. Companies aren't hording money and refusing to hire employees they need. Likewise they are not going to hire employees they don't need.
Now, if you want to argue that many companies are not paying the help they DO hire a decent wage, I'm actually with you on that issue.
But that isn't what you are arguing, you are arguing that a tax cut should have resulted in companies hiring employees they didn't need and that is patently false.