So someone who is corrupt, dishonest, incompetent, untrustworthy, and doesn't have a good track record is considered to be the "best candidate".
Of course not. I've said Trump is obviously not the best candidate.
Clinton, on the other hand, is a superb candidate with an excellent track record. Only the most delusional cultists still try to pretend otherwise.
Must suck for you Clinton-haters, the way that all you have is unhinged irrational hatred for the other candidate. Unlike us, you can't point to anything good about your own candidate. Trump would have to have a concrete position on something for you to support it, and he doesn't, he just flipflops between one vague statement and another. In contrast, Clinton has detailed position statements on everything, policies that haven't wavered, common sense plans that will work.