Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
The framers didn’t contemplate large capacity rapid fire assault weapons that could rip 19 children to shreds in the space of mere minutes.Is that what the framers said?
So the Founding Fathers, who had just fought for freedom from a tyrannical govt & warned us not to let the fed govt grow too strong, only gave us the right to fight against Indians & foreign powers, not against a despotic govt?Bullshit. It was for the defense of the Nation against the worlds superpowers and the natives. The Militia referenced was the one set up by Congress for defense, not bands of Conspiracy theorists.
1. Hunting
2. Target practice
3. Self defense
Case 1 does not require semi auto magazine fed. Certain cases (bear hunting or wild boar) require a handgun but large caliber revolvers serve that purpose.
2. That makes it a toy. A deadly toy
3. Certainly not a magazine fed semi auto. A shot gun is an excellent weapon for home defense.
GFY statist POS
Quit being so scared of an inanimate object. I mean, seriously. My gawd, you mentally ill scum..
Back in the 70's, my Dad applied for his concealed carry permit. He drove a tanker for Exxon and it was the height of the gas crisis. Hijackings of 8,000 gallon gasoline trucks were not unheard of.
We weren't in the city, but on Long Island. Even still, it took about eight months for my Dad, who was a former New York State Trooper, to get approved...
We have a disciplined militia in the national guard."A well regulated Militia, being necessary to the security of a free State, the right of the people to keep and bear Arms, shall not be infringed."
Defense from the tyranny of a powerful govt or any other force is the main purpose.
Home defense is one aspect but defense of rights is the main reason we have the 2A.
They don't teach you kids much do they?
Are you American? Looking for context on the complete lack of understanding about the reason for the Second Amendment.1. Hunting
2. Target practice
3. Self defense
Case 1 does not require semi auto magazine fed. Certain cases (bear hunting or wild boar) require a handgun but large caliber revolvers serve that purpose.
2. That makes it a toy. A deadly toy
3. Certainly not a magazine fed semi auto. A shot gun is an excellent weapon for home defense.
Why Allow Gun Ownership?
Why would any sane American beg for fewer rights?
We have a disciplined militia in the national guard.
You don't get to decide what firearms I own or what I do legally with them.1. Hunting
2. Target practice
3. Self defense
Case 1 does not require semi auto magazine fed. Certain cases (bear hunting or wild boar) require a handgun but large caliber revolvers serve that purpose.
2. That makes it a toy. A deadly toy
3. Certainly not a magazine fed semi auto. A shot gun is an excellent weapon for home defense.
Sorry but a batshit crazy barely legal piece of filthy dogshit here on a stolen citizenship doens’t get to re-write our constitution.The framers didn’t contemplate large capacity rapid fire assault weapons that could rip 19 children to shreds in the space of mere minutes.
Scalia opined in Heller that the strict regulation of such firearms is entirely consistent with the 2nd amendment. Those weapons and magazines are banned in my state and nobody is less free because of that. I would argue we are more free - free to drop our children at school without serious concern that they will be slaughtered there.
Wrong, yet again.....National Guard is DoD.We have a disciplined militia in the national guard.
You are confused Moon Bat.We have a disciplined militia in the national guard.
A "militia" is comprised of civilians whom are NOT under the command of government. We all learned that by third grade...you didn't?We have a disciplined militia in the national guard.
Tell us all how these "common sense gun safety laws" are working out in Chicago, NYC, LA, Baltimore, etcetera, sub-cretin.Well, my guess is that someones "right" to own semi automatic weapons means I have a much higher chance of being murdered.
Perhaps a potential murderers "right" to buy a weapon should first be vetted.
Assault weapons have multiple settings. Civilian versions might look like the military versions, but they're not. What you're really arguing against is the large capacity magazines. I wouldn't have a problem with smaller magazines.Nobody but military and law enforcement need to have ownership or possession of assault firearms and large capacity magazines. All the arguments to the contrary are specious.
You don't know what the fuck you're talking about.3. Self defense
Case 1 does not require semi auto magazine fed.