Why 7,000 Languages?

Languages, due to greed and lust, were entangled with other languages.
That does not mean the languages changed.

Languages are entangled due to interaction between cultures due to proximity, war and trade.

Yes, that does mean they changed
I can read Aramic and Hebrew written 2,000 years ago.
I have many friends who can read 2,000 year old texts in various languages.
The issue is how technology added words.
The root language remains the same
 
Our money is about to say "en Dios confiamos" on it.
 
Languages, due to greed and lust, were entangled with other languages.
That does not mean the languages changed.

Languages are entangled due to interaction between cultures due to proximity, war and trade.

Yes, that does mean they changed
I can read Aramic and Hebrew written 2,00 years ago.
I have many friends who can read 2,000 year old texts in various languages.
The issue is how technology added words.
The root language remains the same
"I can read Aramic and Hebrew written 2,00 years ago", 2 years ago? SPECTACULAR!!!! :biggrin:
 
Languages, due to greed and lust, were entangled with other languages.
That does not mean the languages changed.

Languages are entangled due to interaction between cultures due to proximity, war and trade.

Yes, that does mean they changed
I can read Aramic and Hebrew written 2,00 years ago.
I have many friends who can read 2,000 year old texts in various languages.
The issue is how technology added words.
The root language remains the same
"I can read Aramic and Hebrew written 2,00 years ago", 2 years ago? SPECTACULAR!!!! :biggrin:
Thanks!
Fixed! No more children!
 
...
I already explained that English is a mixture of other languages due to international commerce.

Due to the natural progression of languages throughout history (and the British getting their asses kicked all the time).
Languages, due to greed and lust, were entangled with other languages.
That does not mean the languages changed.
Languages influence each other for a great many reasons in a great many ways. Your attempt at attaching emotional terms like "lust" and "greed" is childish and transparent. And yes, when languages influence each other, both are changed in several ways. Languages change on their own over time regardless.
 
Languages, due to greed and lust, were entangled with other languages.
That does not mean the languages changed.

Languages are entangled due to interaction between cultures due to proximity, war and trade.

Yes, that does mean they changed
I can read Aramic and Hebrew written 2,00 years ago.
I have many friends who can read 2,000 year old texts in various languages.
The issue is how technology added words.
The root language remains the same
Words are added by more than technology.

Today, with an international media and the interweb it is much easier to interact
 
... most that seemed to have changed haven't change,....


Yes, they have.
Google disagrees with you.
Then you’re using Google incorrectly.
Yep!
Google providing Links to Wikipedia.
I guess you'll never be able to trust either one again!

"Wikipedia"? Really? That is your attempt at referencing an unimpeachable source? You can't be serious.
 
Languages, due to greed and lust, were entangled with other languages.
That does not mean the languages changed.

Languages are entangled due to interaction between cultures due to proximity, war and trade.

Yes, that does mean they changed
I can read Aramic and Hebrew written 2,00 years ago.
I have many friends who can read 2,000 year old texts in various languages.
The issue is how technology added words.
The root language remains the same
Words are added by more than technology.

Today, with an international media and the interweb it is much easier to interact
Which adds what to our discussion?
 
... most that seemed to have changed haven't change,....


Yes, they have.
Google disagrees with you.
Then you’re using Google incorrectly.
Yep!
Google providing Links to Wikipedia.
I guess you'll never be able to trust either one again!

"Wikipedia"? Really? That is your attempt at referencing an unimpeachable source? You can't be serious.
Bad Google!
As I said, you will no longer be allowed to use Google or Wikipedia.
 
Primitive cultures moved far enough to be away from the languages that developed where they came from. Languages developed in more than 7,000 different areas. Even now there are dialects of one language that cannot be understood by others. Multiply the time that developed by the time the cultures were separated and you have your answer.

The point is languages are continuously disappeared, we can see no new ones
The gods have played a cruel joke on you.
 
... most that seemed to have changed haven't change,....


Yes, they have.
Google disagrees with you.
Then you’re using Google incorrectly.
Yep!
Google providing Links to Wikipedia.
I guess you'll never be able to trust either one again!

"Wikipedia"? Really? That is your attempt at referencing an unimpeachable source? You can't be serious.
Bad Google!
As I said, you will no longer be allowed to use Google or Wikipedia.
Unlike you, I don't need to use them in order to discuss this topic.
 
... most that seemed to have changed haven't change,....


Yes, they have.
Google disagrees with you.
Then you’re using Google incorrectly.
Yep!
Google providing Links to Wikipedia.
I guess you'll never be able to trust either one again!

"Wikipedia"? Really? That is your attempt at referencing an unimpeachable source? You can't be serious.
Bad Google!
As I said, you will no longer be allowed to use Google or Wikipedia.
Unlike you, I don't need to use them in order to discuss this topic.
I couldn't tell you knew anything from your last couple of years of posting.
 
... most that seemed to have changed haven't change,....


Yes, they have.
Google disagrees with you.
Then you’re using Google incorrectly.
Yep!
Google providing Links to Wikipedia.
I guess you'll never be able to trust either one again!

"Wikipedia"? Really? That is your attempt at referencing an unimpeachable source? You can't be serious.
Bad Google!
As I said, you will no longer be allowed to use Google or Wikipedia.
Unlike you, I don't need to use them in order to discuss this topic.
I couldn't tell you knew anything from your last couple of years of posting.
Then you haven’t been paying attention.
 

Forum List

Back
Top