Who wishes that Kamala Harris had won the 2024 election instead of Trump? (Poll)

[kyzr]

On CNBC this morning Joe Kernan asked Andrew if he wished that Kamala or even Joe Biden had won the election.

I don't think Andrew answered, but it was a very pertinent question.

NJ Dem Governor Can't Name A Single Kamala Policy He's 'Wild About' [WATCH]

On Thursday, New Jersey Governor Phil Murphy appeared on CNBC’s Squawk Box, where host Joe Kernan pressed him on Kamala Harris’s policy positions, raising

www.rvmnews.com

NJ Dem Governor Can’t Name A Single Kamala Policy He’s ‘Wild About’​

As Obama famously said, "elections have consequences".

If 2020 taught us anything it is that there are incompetent presidents, and the "free press" enables them.

Just curious if anyone has voter's remorse or still sees Kamala as a better president.

 

[pknopp]

I wish both had lost.

 

[1srelluc]

So it looks like the NJ governor failed the MS-LSD "purity" test.

 

[Manonthestreet]

Come on man she was robbed.....ummmmm....ummmm

 

[WorldWatcher]

Biden should have announced in the fall of 2023 that he'd be a one term President and that it was time to pass the torch.

Then the DEMs would have had time to run a full primary season and selected someone to run against Trump, and I'm pretty certain it would have not been Kamala.

WW

 

[gipper]

On CNBC this morning Joe Kernan asked Andrew if he wished that Kamala or even Joe Biden had won the election.

I don't think Andrew answered, but it was a very pertinent question.

NJ Dem Governor Can't Name A Single Kamala Policy He's 'Wild About' [WATCH]

On Thursday, New Jersey Governor Phil Murphy appeared on CNBC’s Squawk Box, where host Joe Kernan pressed him on Kamala Harris’s policy positions, raising

www.rvmnews.com

NJ Dem Governor Can’t Name A Single Kamala Policy He’s ‘Wild About’​

As Obama famously said, "elections have consequences".

If 2020 taught us anything it is that there are incompetent presidents, and the "free press" enables them.

Just curious if anyone has voter's remorse or still sees Kamala as a better president.

Does it matter?

 

[kyzr]

Biden should have announced in the fall of 2023 that he'd be a one term President and that it was time to pass the torch.

Then the DEMs would have had time to run a full primary season and selected someone to run against Trump, and I'm pretty certain it would have not been Kamala. WW

He did promise to be a one-term president....

I’m Wading Into a Political-Media-Bro Debate About Joe Biden to Set the Record Straight

They’re fighting over an alleged “promise” from 2020. Let’s review the evidence.

slate.com

The Bros of Political Media Are Real Mad at One Another About Whether Joe Biden Promised to Serve One Term​

 

[kyzr]

Does it matter?

Yes it does matter.
What matters are the qualifications that a good president needs to have.
What happens when we elect a weak president?
As WW said above, if he democrats had a primary process a stronger democrat candidate would have emerged.
What also matters is that the "Free Press" is biased, so biased that in a close election they could affect the result, like in 2020, and then write books about how they were fooled.

 

[iamwhatiseem]

Anyone who says Harris is certifiable.
You may not like Trump, but 4 more years of $7 trillion added to the debt, runaway immigration on top of what Biden allowed - the nation would have been ready to topple.
Can you even imagine her in this Iran/Israeli conflict? She would have NO idea what to do, other than appease Iran and probably offer more money to beg them to stop like Obama/Biden did. And in 4 more years Iran would 100% have nukes, Hez and Hamas would likely rule the entire region as Iran spends our tax dollars she would giveaway to buy off other nations and infiltrate with Hez/Hamas.

 

[pknopp]

Anyone who says Harris is certifiable.
You may not like Trump, but 4 more years of $7 trillion added to the debt, runaway immigration on top of what Biden allowed - the nation would have been ready to topple.
Can you even imagine her in this Iran/Israeli conflict? She would have NO idea what to do, other than appease Iran and probably offer more money to beg them to stop like Obama/Biden did. And in 4 more years Iran would 100% have nukes, Hez and Hamas would likely rule the entire region as Iran spends our tax dollars she would giveaway to buy off other nations and infiltrate with Hez/Hamas.

If not for a very small number of Senators we would easily surpass 7 trillion in the next four years. Its still too early to tell if they will be able to hold the line or not.

 

[SeaMajor7]

Biden should have announced in the fall of 2023 that he'd be a one term President and that it was time to pass the torch.

Then the DEMs would have had time to run a full primary season and selected someone to run against Trump, and I'm pretty certain it would have not been Kamala.

WW

But, they chose to make Kamala Harris the candidate without ANYONE VOTING FOR HER.
You and the rest of the demented LEFT always clamor about "saving our democracy", and turn around and SPIT in the faces of your electorate and INSTALL a candidate.
Completely unprecedented treachery, and you all went along with it without a whimper of opposition.
Such disregard for voters, and you took it right up your own behinds.
PATHETIC.

 

[Independent thinker]

Biden should have announced in the fall of 2023 that he'd be a one term President and that it was time to pass the torch.

Then the DEMs would have had time to run a full primary season and selected someone to run against Trump, and I'm pretty certain it would have not been Kamala.

WW

It would be interesting to see that timeline. I predict that since she was picked due to DEI that there would have been a lot of pushback from many in the party if she had not won the nomination in that scenario. Many would have been accusing their own party of racism and being misogynists, splintering the party.

 

[pknopp]

It would be interesting to see that timeline. I predict that since she was picked due to DEI that there would have been a lot of pushback from many in the party if she had not won the nomination in that scenario. Many would have been accusing their own party of racism and being misogynists, splintering the party.

She came in last place during the 2020 primaries. I'm sure that pissed off the party heads that inexplicably supported her but few outside of that were upset.

 

[Independent thinker]

She came in last place during the 2020 primaries. I'm sure that pissed off the party heads that inexplicably supported her but few outside of that were upset.

So? The fact is Iran has been enriching uranium over the years to higher and higher levels until now they are just a hair width away from weapons grade. They admit and brag about that themselves. So, how can you deny that?

 

[CrusaderFrank]

Biden should have announced in the fall of 2023 that he'd be a one term President and that it was time to pass the torch.

Then the DEMs would have had time to run a full primary season and selected someone to run against Trump, and I'm pretty certain it would have not been Kamala.

WW

If my Aunt had wheels, she’d be a bicycle

 

[buckeye]

Biden should have announced in the fall of 2023 that he'd be a one term President and that it was time to pass the torch.

Then the DEMs would have had time to run a full primary season and selected someone to run against Trump, and I'm pretty certain it would have not been Kamala.

WW

Wait! That sounds like the constitutional republic we are.

The DNC will have none of that ridiculous stuff.

 

[pknopp]

So? The fact is Iran has been enriching uranium over the years to higher and higher levels until now they are just a hair width away from weapons grade. They admit and brag about that themselves. So, how can you deny that?

Maybe pay attention to what thread you are posting in.

 

[buckeye]

She came in last place during the 2020 primaries. I'm sure that pissed off the party heads that inexplicably supported her but few outside of that were upset.

She would have done what she was told to do as well as she could.

That and her identity, which rules the democrat party, gets her DNC backing.

 

[JohnDB]

The question running around in my mind is:

Kamala could have very easily invoked the 25th Ammendment....been president at least for the past two years of Biden's term in office.

Would NOT have been difficult to make happen.

WHY did she not do that? What stopped her from doing so? She could have garnered Republican support to enact it as well. Been president when running against Trump.

But she didn't.
Then she ran the most expensive but worthless campaign against Trump and absolutely blew away any political career she might have had in the future.

She stalled and stonewalled her platform. (Not having one is a death sentence in political circles)

She gave embarrassing speeches. No-talent talent not perform at her rallies. Past politicians tried to put lipstick on the pig of her campaign but nobody kissed the pig except for illegal donors. (USAID money recycled back into her campaign)

Kamala was her own worst enemy. Two opportunities, well greased, to slide her into the Presidency and she absolutely failed.

Did she do it deliberately? Or is she that incompetent?
I'll give her the benefit of the doubt and say she did it deliberately.

 

[kyzr]

It would be interesting to see that timeline. I predict that since she was picked due to DEI that there would have been a lot of pushback from many in the party if she had not won the nomination in that scenario. Many would have been accusing their own party of racism and being misogynists, splintering the party.

Actually Kamala was picked because she could inherit Biden's $91m war chest.

What would happen to Biden’s campaign cash if he drops out? That’s up to Kamala Harris

Some campaign finance experts say Harris could use the tens of millions of dollars in Biden’s campaign account if she became the Democratic nominee.

www.nbcnews.com