Who will start for the Saints at QB in the opener?

[Couchpotato]

PARROTING STATS, which is ALL you do...

Yeah it’s called evidence to support one’s contention. Some people seem to think k you need more than

“Because I said”

“Trust me”

I realize that’s hard for you to grasp as that’s all you have.

 

[EMH]

Yeah it’s called evidence to support one’s contention. Some people seem to think k you need more than

“Because I said”

“Trust me”

I realize that’s hard for you to grasp as that’s all you have.

A confession "your opinion" of Rattler has nothing to do with watching him play, which you have never done...

 

[Couchpotato]

A confession "your opinion" of Rattler has nothing to do with watching him play, which you have never done...

1. This is all opinion, yours, mine or anyone else who weighs in.

2 I have watched Rattler play.

3. This is just the "because I said" argument which isnt compelling in any way.


NO will draft a QB in the 1st round next year, and that person will likely be the starter in NO. Rattler will either be the back up on that team or get moved to another team to be the back up. I'll bet anything you want on that.

 

[EMH]

1. This is all opinion, yours, mine or anyone else who weighs in.

2 I have watched Rattler play.

3. This is just the "because I said" argument which isnt compelling in any way.


NO will draft a QB in the 1st round next year, and that person will likely be the starter in NO. Rattler will either be the back up on that team or get moved to another team to be the back up. I'll bet anything you want on that.

Just don't delete the post, because we should remember to check it next April...

 

[Couchpotato]

Just don't delete the post, because we should remember to check it next April...

Why would I delete the post? What's the wager?

 

[EMH]

Why would I delete the post? What's the wager?

I'm not saying you will delete. My satisfaction will be to read it on May 1st and laugh at you...

Every team "needs" a 1st round QB like

Bryce Young
Anthony Richardson
JaMarcus Russell
Brady Quinn
Zach Wilson
Mac Jones
Justin Fields
Mtich whoever the guy was the Bears took over Pat Mahomes...

and it is always important to trade your next three First Rounders to get him!!!!

and any team starting a QB drafted after round 1....

Brett Favre
Kurt Warner
Drew Brees
Tom Brady

goes nowhere...

 

[Couchpotato]

I'm not saying you will delete. My satisfaction will be to read it on May 1st and laugh at you...

In other words you are afraid you are wrong and too much of a ***** to actual wager anything that you are right.

Every team "needs" a 1st round QB like

Bryce Young
Anthony Richardson
JaMarcus Russell
Brady Quinn
Zach Wilson
Mac Jones
Justin Fields
Mtich whoever the guy was the Bears took over Pat Mahomes...

and it is always important to trade your next three First Rounders to get him!!!!

and any team starting a QB drafted after round 1....

Brett Favre
Kurt Warner
Drew Brees
Tom Brady

goes nowhere...

No one ever said that.

The Saints wont have to trade anything to draft a QB high in the first round. They are likely to be holding the 1st overall pick.... Because Rattler is the best QB in his draft class... LOL

 

[Couchpotato]

I'm not saying you will delete. My satisfaction will be to read it on May 1st and laugh at you...

Every team "needs" a 1st round QB like

Bryce Young
Anthony Richardson
JaMarcus Russell
Brady Quinn
Zach Wilson
Mac Jones
Justin Fields
Mtich whoever the guy was the Bears took over Pat Mahomes...

and it is always important to trade your next three First Rounders to get him!!!!

and any team starting a QB drafted after round 1....

Brett Favre
Kurt Warner
Drew Brees
Tom Brady

goes nowhere...

Bryce Young has a better record and has played better than Rattler.

Mac Jones made the pro bowl (admittedly because a bunch of others opted not to play) how many QB's in the NFC would have to opt out for Rattler to get a Pro Bowl nod? 20ish? More? And Jones is balling out in SF.

How many back ups would make the pro bowl over Rattler currently

Jones
Wentz


But you hold on to that take because God forbid you just admit you were wrong and it was a bad one.

 

[EMH]

^^^^^^^

Does not understand the football he watches.

Vince Young won the game, never mind the Titan offense managed 5 first downs and their 17 points were

PacMan pick 6
PacMan PR for TD
PacMan KR to Jags red zone, Vince and offense went 3 and out and they got a FG

VINCE YOUNG "won" the game.

 

[Couchpotato]

^^^^^^^

Does not understand the football he watches.

Vince Young won the game, never mind the Titan offense managed 5 first downs and their 17 points were

PacMan pick 6
PacMan PR for TD
PacMan KR to Jags red zone, Vince and offense went 3 and out and they got a FG

VINCE YOUNG "won" the game.

WTF are you talking about?

 

[EMH]

WTF are you talking about?

You always claim the QB won or lost the game.

This is because you are an absolute MORON.

https://www.theledger.com/story/news/2006/12/18/defense-powers-titans-over-jags/25879750007/

Did Vince Young "win" this game for the Titans???


Time of Possession 44:22 15:38

INDIVIDUAL STATISTICS

RUSHING-Jacksonville, Jones-Drew 25-98, Garrard 6-43, Taylor 2-37, Toefield 6-25, Pearman 1-(minus 1). Tennessee, Henry 12-37, Young 4-4.

PASSING-Jacksonville, Garrard 22-37-3-233. Tennessee, Young 8-15-0-85.



First downs 23 5 - The TITANS HAD FIVE FIRST DOWNS THE WHOLE GAME!!!

Total Net Yards 396 98

 

[Couchpotato]

You always claim the QB won or lost the game.

This is because you are an absolute MORON.

https://www.theledger.com/story/news/2006/12/18/defense-powers-titans-over-jags/25879750007/

Did Vince Young "win" this game for the Titans???


Time of Possession 44:22 15:38

INDIVIDUAL STATISTICS

RUSHING-Jacksonville, Jones-Drew 25-98, Garrard 6-43, Taylor 2-37, Toefield 6-25, Pearman 1-(minus 1). Tennessee, Henry 12-37, Young 4-4.

PASSING-Jacksonville, Garrard 22-37-3-233. Tennessee, Young 8-15-0-85.



First downs 23 5 - The TITANS HAD FIVE FIRST DOWNS THE WHOLE GAME!!!

Total Net Yards 396 98

That's not even close to what I've said. Wins is a QB stat. It's a data point like TD/int ratio, or completion percentage. When people talk about WR's or MLB's they don't talk about the number of wins vs loses they have. You cant find it on their stat sheet. But you can for QB's.

At this point you're just grasping at straws and trying to put words in my mouth. Your argument that Rattler is good "because you said" just isn't compelling.

 

[EMH]

Wins is a QB stat

WRONG, wins in football are a TEAM STAT.

 

[Couchpotato]

WRONG, wins in football are a TEAM STAT.

Funny how they keep the QB record statistic then. Something they don’t do for any other position. But whatever you believe whatever you want.

 

[EMH]

Funny how they keep the QB record statistic then

and if "they" say it, you parrot it, and hence it must be true...

 

[Couchpotato]

and if "they" say it, you parrot it, and hence it must be true...

Well “they” clearly know more than you so…

 

[EMH]

Well “they” clearly know more than you so…

and THAT is THE DEFINITION of PARROT, "I have no personal observations, I have no clue what I am talking about, but I'm parroting a greater guru than you"

 

[Couchpotato]

and THAT is THE DEFINITION of PARROT, "I have no personal observations, I have no clue what I am talking about, but I'm parroting a greater guru than you"

Ok champ. We can readdress this when Rattler is on the bench.

 

[EMH]

Ok champ. We can readdress this when Rattler is on the bench.

And when will that be??

 

[EMH]

Start the Jeopardy! music....