Hi C-101:
Let us all be absolutely sure of one thing: Those among you coming out here every damn day to run diversion for the Official Cover Story LIES are just as guilty as the Inside-job Bad Guys who murdered innocent Americans in the first place. You come out here to try and convince these readers that 100-ton Jetliners crashed where no such thing ever happened, even though you have NO EVIDENCE to support anything at all.
I'm sensing some desperation here.
This is a picture of the EMPTY HOLE that includes no crashed 100-ton Jetliner. :0) Thank you for helping to make ‘my’ case that Flight 93 Never Crashed here
Well, what can you say. If you acknowledge the obvious, that would mean the end of your flight 93 conspiracy theories.
The truth hurts, I know. But you must accept it for your sanity's sake.
This guy is supposed to be showing your photographs of a crashed 100-ton Jetliner, but instead he uses diversionary trickery by asking stupid rhetorical questions!
I'm just wondering if you have an ounce of common sense.
You keep posting these large pictures of commercial jet liners over the hole like it's somehow supposed to stay intact upon impact.
This is the Official Gov’t Evidence of THE EMPTY HOLE and this C-101 Gov’t Cover Story Crony can keep on asking his silly questions. :0)
Is there an echo in this thread?
Oh wait, it's just you repeating the same falsehood for the umpteenth time in this thread and many others.
Questions, questions and more silly/stupid/ignorant questions. You have ‘no physical evidence’ to prove a real 100-ton Jetliner crashed in the EMPTY HOLE in the EMPTY Shanksville field, so you quote other people without one clue. :0)
The pictures all show AN EMPTY HOLE:
Say this with me really show this time: “All of the pictures taken outside Shanksville show the same EMPTY HOLE.”
This is a close-up shot of THE EMPTY HOLE that shows grass growing on all the inclines. This little empty hole This C-101 guy is trying to ‘divide’ the reading audience by asking these stupid questions using ‘he-said, she-said’ nonsense, because ALL of the pictures show the same little EMPTY HOLE.
Go ahead and ask some more stupid questions.
Your last picture even has arrows pointing to debris and you still refuse to see it.
Look at the yellow ‘Do Not Cross’ Ribbon stretched across the crime scene just a few feet away from THE EMPTY HOLE behind the supervisor standing there with his hands crossed behind his back. That yellow tape represents the boundary between our EMPTY HOLE and NOTHING outside the hole but more growing grass. Go through and look at each so-called crash site worker to realize that practically every back is turned to the EMPTY HOLE, because there is nothing resembling a real 100-ton crashed Jetliner anywhere in this empty field. Some of you have been DUPED by Disinformation Operatives like C-101 here coming out to this fine USMB Board to boldly claim that 100-ton Jetliners crashed in EMPTY HOLES, when nothing like that ever happened at all. The Official Cover Story Grand Delusion is perpetuated by people like C-101, because some people have ‘an agenda’ to convince you of 911LIES with no basis in reality whatsoever. The question then concerns WHY some people are helping a rogue element inside our own U.S. Gov’t to convince people that 100-ton Jetliners crashed into empty fields. :0)
Well, I must admit that you're right.
I work for the CIA and I was employed shortly after 9/11 as a disinformation agent.
You got me.
. . .
Stop playing these readers as your FOOLS with nonsense about bouncing engines, when you are missing 100 tons of evidence that any Jetliner crashed here. Because C-101 is only going to keep LYING to your faces:
Feast your eyes once again upon THE EMPTY HOLE in the EMPTY FIELD that includes no 60-ton Titanium frame, no 6-ton Rolls-Royce Engines, no massive wing sections, no 200 seats, no cargo, no indestructible landing gear, no massive tail section standing almost 50 feet tall above the tarmac, because Fight 93 NEVER CRASHED HERE
And on that note, back to the pictures.
But of course as a CIA operative I know that this is all planted evidence designed to fool you.
Now this guy is insulting our collective intelligence by insisting that a 100-ton Jetliner ‘blew up’ (heh) “before it hit the ground OR after it hit the ground,” because he has no evidence that a real 100-ton Jetliner ever crashed into this little EMPTY HOLE at all. ZERO! :0) All of the Officially “Planted” evidence can fit into the back of a single pickup truck, which confirms the absolute fact that we have been looking at Inside-Job Attacks all along. C-101’s “It Blew Up!” theory defies common sense and all the laws of physics, because he must prove how the components of a real 100-ton Jetliner vaporized into thin air without leaving one ounce of ‘melted’ titanium, aluminum, steel or anything else. Now his missing 100-ton Jetliner simply ‘blew up’ (this guy has no shame), but the little empty hole still has grass growing on all the inclines ‘and’ was already in this empty field from a failed strip mining venture that went sour ‘before’ April 20, 1994
Uh, no.
All three planes at the WTC and Pentagon blew up. There are several pictures and video of these explosions.
Jet fuel is very voliatile and it would be of no surprise that the plane blew up, seeing how the plane is believed to have been flying errantly upside down into the field at an extreme angle.
There is also witness testimony for this.
Eric Peterson of Lambertsville was working with a friend in his auto shop this morning. They heard a plane and looked up and saw a large aircraft close to the ground. "I actually thought it was going to hit a house here in town," said Peterson. It blew out windows of a nearby farmhouse when it crashed. As it went over started going end over end, Peterson said, and then dropped below a tree line and exploded. Peterson saw a flash and then a mushroom cloud of smoke. The plane went down on a strip mine field. Peterson and his friend rushed to the field and looked for bodies, but couldn't find any. They called out, but heard nothing. There was a crater in the ground that was really burning. There were pieces of fuselage and clothing all over the area, burning, said Peterson. He said he didn't see any debris longer than a couple of feet long.[8]
Eric Peterson of Lambertsville looked up when he heard the plane. "It was low enough, I thought you could probably count the rivets," Peterson said. "You could see more of the roof of the plane than you could the belly. It was on its side. There was a great explosion and you could see the flames. It was a massive, massive explosion. Flames and then smoke and then a massive, massive mushroom cloud." Peterson called 9-1-1 and ran to the crash site but found only burning jet parts, pieces of clothing, and seat cushions.
United Airlines Flight 93 - Witnesses -Debunk 9/11 Myths
But of course, Mr. Peterson and every other "eyewittness" was planted by the government in preparation for 9/11 according to what the CIA told me.
No. The mushroom cloud was created by the Raytheon Missile that Senor Bushie, Karl Rove, Dick Cheney and Donald Rumsfeld shot into the center of the little empty hole.
So where did this missile launch from?
What was its flight path?
Was it a ACM missile or Tomahawk cruise missile?
How do you know the manufacturer is Raytheon?
What evidence is there that any government official ordered a missile strike?
Does a missile of this type create a mushroom cloud?
Is it so loud and powerful that it blows out of the windows of nearby buildings?
Does this missile scorch a forested area in a triangular plane shape?
Listen to the testimony from this lady to realize that she saw ‘a missile’ fly directly over her van and under the power lines to bank to the right and nosedive directly into the center of the little empty hole. The evidence will also show that the Pentagon case includes another Raytheon Missile that struck the Column Line 14 location at exactly 9:31:39 AM. This Susan McElwain is describing a ‘cylinder-shaped’ object between 20 and 25 feet long that is no larger than her van and no 100-ton Jetliner that Mr. C-101 here wants you to believe simply ‘blew up.’ :0)
The entire video she was talking about a
triangular plane and then those guys were egging her on to say "missile" which is contrary to her previous testimony.
"It had two rear engines, a big fin on the back like a spoiler on the back of a car and with two upright fins at the side."
~Susan McElwain~
Last time I checked, a missile does not have two rear engines but the confirmed Dassault 20 falcon did.
She said that she "ducked down" when she wittnessed this and she also had a hard time explaining her experience at one point in the video; stopping mid sentence and starting her story over about three times.
Go to Raytheon's wikipedia page. They got links to all of their missile models both old, new, and experimental.
But of course, the CIA told me that they had a secret missile that looked like a plane to launch just for 9/11.
Yeah, yeah, yeah. Some people like C-101 have speculated about a real 100-ton Jetliner blowing up too, but the eyewitness reports discredit that kind of nonsense; because people like Susan McElwain WERE THERE ‘and’ . . .
. . . the News Reports from the Empty Field include a 20-feet by 10 to 15-feet EMPTY HOLE. We are talking about a ‘crater in the ground,’ because the missile went BOOM. :0)
Edit: "because the plane went BOOM."
This is very funny coming from a guy declaring that a real 100-ton Jetliner ‘blew up’ to disappear into thin air. :0)
This is very funny from a guy who denies all eyewittness accounts, is blind to plane debris, and thinks that a plane will mysteriously crash unharmed into the ground.
Questions, questions and more stupid questions! You are here to defend Senor Bushie’s Official Cover Story without regard to the absolute fact that all the pictures show AN EMPTY HOLE! The News Reporter just said that there were no pieces larger than a phonebook, but then over in the trees somewhere the Gov’t finds a few little pieces that all combined can fit into the back of one pickup truck. Note that we have no burns on these ‘planted’ parts, but the remainder of the 100-ton Jetliner is missing. :0)
Again, this is the size of your missing 100-ton Jetliner in comparison to the size of your little EMPTY HOLE. And no, I do not think you care about telling ‘the’ 911Truth about the little EMPTY HOLE, because you are here to stand condemned with Senor Bushie, Karl Rove, Dick Cheney, Donald Rumsfeld, the Wargame NORAD Gang, the corrupt FBI and CIA and NSA and all of their subordinate cartoon character agencies all telling the same 911LIES part of your DoD Counterintelligence/Disinformation Campaign that only makes you look like FOOLS.
Now we are looking at more ‘debunking’ (
heh) stupidity from a guy without a case for a real 100-ton Jetliner crashing anywhere. Maybe your silly diversionary bait-and-switch mind tricks will work on some of these readers, but I can assure you with 100 percent assurance that none of your Official Cover Story NONSENSE will work on me. :0)
Again? Okie! (
Click here). The little hole is already in this empty field when this US Geological Survey Photograph was taken on April 20, 1994, so Senor Bushie and his Inside-job Gang decided to detonate the payload of a Raytheon Missile in the middle of the hole to simulate ‘wings’ of a crashed Jetliner that ‘you say’ blew up. :0)
There is no evidence of any Jetliner debris in or around the little empty hole, but ‘your’ planted evidence showed up over in the trees. Okay hotshot, so explain why there is no debris ‘between’ the empty hole and your planted evidence that is not even burned. You are still missing 100 Tons of evidence. :0)
Asking the same stupid questions a thousand times is not going to make a case for a real 100-ton Jetliner crashing into this empty hole. :0)
C-101 needs to remove those rose-colored glasses that force him into seeing crashed 100-ton Jetliners where only AN EMPTY HOLE is present in the photographs. He is talking about ‘dirt,’ because of the absence of any crashed 100-ton Jetliner. :0)
That little piece of ‘planted’ rusty evidence (
pic) has nothing to do with any crashed 100-ton Jetliner. Note how the little piece of planted evidence just happens to fit inside the backhoe bucket ‘and’ how all of the planted evidence can easily fit inside the bed of a single pickup truck ‘and’ was found a some distance ‘away’ from the little empty hole. Just one of the big problems facing this Gov’t Cover Story Crony is that the empty hole still has the grass growing on all the inclines (
pic), which means this Official Gov’t Evidence was ‘planted’ after the fact.
4) You have serious problems if you think that a engine is going to stay in one piece after a crash like that.
This guy is trying to use one little piece of planted rusty engine to represent one of these babies:
Just forget about the fact that he is missing over 5 TONS from one of the Rolls-Royce engines ‘and’ that these Boeing 757-200 Jetliners come with a matching pair. :0) Let me guess! The remainder of the 100-ton Jetliner bounced out of this empty hole and out of this empty field to land over in the trees somewhere ‘and’ disappear into thin air; when the eyewitness above says that she saw a little white missile-like cylinder fly directly over her van and crash to explode. No sir. All of the evidence says no 100-ton Jetliner crashed here and C-101 is simply trying to tell the Official Cover Story LIE ‘and’ without much evidence for anything.
Also, it is important to note that 95% of the Flight 93 debris was recovered.
Now this guy is just being absurd and ridiculous! These massive 100-ton Jetliners have hundreds of ‘time-change parts’ (
George Nelson Story) that include serial numbers recorded in log books that would allow for investigators to identify Flight 93 in about fifteen minutes after the cool-down period. And yet, the Gov’t has failed to turn over a single serial number from even one time-change part to prove the corrupt FBI is even in passion of one 9/11 Airliner. C-101 is obviously LYING right here in this post, because his first LIE is that Flight 93 ‘blew up,’ but now the Gov’t has recovered 95% of the 100-Ton Jetliner that somehow rematerialized from the little empty hole. :0)
This C-101 guy is nothing but a Loyal Bushie JOKE. :0)
GL,
[FONT="]Terral[/FONT]
Hi C-101:
Look above. The plane blew up, disintegrated, and crash investigators reported that countless pieces of debris were present with very few big pieces.
C-101 has no evidence that a real 100-ton Jetliner crashed anywhere, so his Jetliner ‘blew up’ and ‘disintegrated’ into thin air to leave only the little empty hole. :0)
Thanks for posting a video that lies right away about there being no plane at the Pentagon.
A DoD Jet ‘did’ hit the Pentagon at 9:36:27 AM (
my thread), for which we have some debris (
pic), but that has nothing to do with AA77 or any crashed 100-ton JETLINER.
No. What I need is for C-101 to begin producing pictures of a crashed 100-Ton Jetliner that ‘you say’ crashed . . .
. . . into this standing E-ring Wall! Let me take a wild guess! This C-101 guy is going to say that the 100-Ton Jetliner vaporized into thin air either ‘before’ or ‘after’ impact. :0) If you remember from the Fox News Clip above, then we are looking at a 20-feet diameter empty hole for the Shanksville Case ‘and’ now we are looking at another 18-feet 3-inch empty hole at the Pentagon!
Note the undamaged green SUV that C-101’s fantasy 100-ton Jetliner missed ‘and’ never even broke one window on the third floor (
damage schematic pic). The two second-story windows to the left of the little impact hole are also unbroken, but this C-101 guy wants you to believe that a real 100-ton Jetliner did one of these numbers (
pic) through this same E-ring wall going a whopping 530 miles per hour. :0)
Note how C-101’s 100-ton Jetliners have a habit of blowing up and vaporizing into thin air, but only on 9/11 for these related Inside-job attacks. :0)
Now what happens when a plane blows up?
It breaks apart into MILLIONS of pieces and those pieces often disintegrate in the instant heat of the blast and ensuing fire.
Yeah. Right! I supposed all of that disintegration took place ‘before’ your 100-ton Jetliner ever hit the Pentagon. :0) For your information, April Gallop and her son were sitting behind Column Line #6 (
pic and
pic =
my thread), which is in the direct path of the port-side wing (
pic) and she evacuated the building through the impact hole! Terry Cohen was sitting in a meeting inside one of those construction trailers just 100 feet from the impact hole. She grabbed her hardhat and ran to the impact hole within mere seconds ‘and’ reported “Just Smoke” (
News Video). There was no massive fire that you are LYING about and no ‘intense heat’ that vaporized any 100-ton Jetliner . . .
. . . which we know by the fact that the black plastic remained unburned just outside the Pentagon. You see fire ‘now’ in this picture, because the DoD A-3 Jet returned exactly 4 minutes and 48 seconds ‘later’ to crash at this very same location in a second failed attempt to bring the E-ring roof down and simulate a real Jetliner crash.
So, no, the plane is not going to stay in one piece like some cartoon but rather burst apart.
Amazing, is it not?
Listen here: If anybody here want to believe this guy’s Official Cover Story NONSENSE, then go right ahead. All this guy can do is come out to this fine USMB Conspiracy Theories Board and tell
Loyal Bushie LIES that have no basis in reality whatsoever.
GL,
Terral
Someone has entirely too much time on their hands.
I've already wasted a good two hours of my life in responding to this post, so I'll just ignore your second follow up post.
but this dis in fo agent fails to show a video that is out there in one of my 47 videos at my canada wants the truth site where a newscaster comes on and says-a bomb must have been planted in the building because there is NO EVIDENCE of a jet airliner that hit the buildings,NO EVIDENCE of any airliner debris. Where is the tail section of the plane? He cant show it.where is the nose section? He wont show the pics. where are the pics of the bodies of the victems on the airliner? this guy wont show the pics.where are the pics of the luggage on the airliner? this guy wont post the pics. How come with the most sophisticated defense system in the world,the pentagon only produced 2 pics of an alleged airliner crashing into the wall which proves NOTHING that an airliner crashed there? 
eusa_liar
