Who shall investigate the investigators (a J6 committee update)!

[Dante]

https://conservativebrief.com/johnson-forms-88956/

I seek verification.

This is excellent.

Partisan hearings and sub-committees.

Just another waste of government money.

 

[BackAgain]

For sure the American people need to know what went down in all that and for sure the Democrats and the surrogate propaganda media they control were not in any way honest about it.

Along the same vein, who fact checks the fact checkers who also often put out serious distortions and disinformation?

The ancient Roman question was:

Quis custodiet ipsos custodes?​

Who will watch the watchmen, themselves?

Your follow-up question is on the mark.

I once came-up with an answer of sorts to that question (in a paper I wrote many years ago): we wlil — as long as we have the will.

 

[BackAgain]

Partisan hearings and sub-committees.

Just another waste of government money.

Yes. The J6 committee was a massive waste of time and money.

 

[OldFlame]

Trump made them commit crimes against the United States for which they need a pardon?

That's a weird statement

At the very least, they're implying Trump will 'abuse' the 'justice system' somehow, admitting that they know it can be done. They've watched it happen for 8 years now.

 

[OldFlame]

Can you investigate someone if there is no crime? I suspect not.

You simply make them up, we've watched the corrupt D assholes do it for years now.

 

[struth]

Being president makes him immune from criminal prosecution from the DoJ which was ongoing at the time of the election.

Jack dismissed his case cause he was illegally appointed

 

[struth]

You lied about what they said. They said nothing. You’re making an assumption.

Thanks.

No I didn’t, they didn’t refer him to the DOJ

That isn’t an assumption, it’s a fact

 

[Marener]

Jack dismissed his case cause he was illegally appointed

He dismissed the case because he couldn’t legally pursue it after Trump became president. There was no determination from Judge Chutkan that he was illegally appointed. You’re lying again.

 

[Marener]

No I didn’t, they didn’t refer him to the DOJ

That isn’t an assumption, it’s a fact

You’re making an assumption about what this “says”. I can make assumptions about it too.

Your assumption is not a fact. It’s a fact you lied.

 

[struth]

He dismissed the case because he couldn’t legally pursue it after Trump became president. There was no determination from Judge Chutkan that he was illegally appointed. You’re lying again.

of course he couldn’t legally pursue it m, it was illegal, the court ruled that and it’s the law of the land.

 

[OldFlame]

So, your understanding of the Costitutional speech and debate clause protections is essentially the same as complete immunity from investigation and prosecution even if the member has committed criminal acts in that capacity?

I doubt your view carries much weight.

Yeah, that's what moronor is saying, truly an idiot. lol

 

[Marener]

of course he couldn’t legally pursue it m, it was illegal, the court ruled that and it’s the law of the land.

A judge in Florida may have ruled that but that means nothing for the case being prosecuted in DC.

Even the case in Florida was proceeding as Smith was appealing Cannon’s ruling.

You’re either stupid or lying again. I can’t decide.

 

[OldFlame]

haha what? provide something to support your claim that a witness's testimony in Congress is protected by that clause?

Moroner heard it on some leftist whacko 'news' broadcast, or read it on some leftist whacko website, therefore it's sacrosanct.

 

[struth]

A judge in Florida may have ruled that but that means nothing for the case being prosecuted in DC.

Even the case in Florida was proceeding as Smith was appealing Cannon’s ruling.

You’re either stupid or lying again. I can’t decide.

Of course it doesn’t, it’s highly persevere case law.

With that said, Jack could have continued in DC, but couldn’t get his case to trial, and had to resign in disgrace

 

[SeaMajor7]

The helicopter matches the SPIN metaphorically.
Nice avie, moroner.

 

[Edgetho]

So those convicted of violence get pardoned while those elected by voters get 'investigated'. The new normal.

Yeah, here's one of those extremely violent right wingers that got pardoned by OMB

Pro-life activist prosecuted by Biden DOJ reacts to Trump pardon: 'I want to give him a hug'

Pro-life grandmother Joan Bell, sentenced in November 2023 for blocking a D.C. abortion clinic in 2020, was one of the nearly two dozen activists pardoned by President Donald Trump.

www.foxnews.com

She was arrested for praying in front of an abortion clinic. What a criminal, huh!!?!

Bell, who lives in New Jersey, was sentenced to more than two years in prison in November 2023 for participating in a "blockade," conspiring with other activists at a Washington D.C. abortion clinic in October 2020, according to President Biden's Department of Justice (DOJ).

When Joan Bell, 76, was given the news she was one of the pro-life activists pardoned by President Donald Trump Thursday afternoon, she was in disbelief

"Many, many of them are elderly people," Trump said in the Oval Office. "They should not have been prosecuted. This is a great honor to sign this. They'll be very happy."

Bell, along with Paula Paulette Harlow, Jean Marshall and John Hinshaw, were all around 70 years old when they were imprisoned.

Yeah, lock those dangerous criminals up!!!

And here's your very brave, extremely courageous Law Enforcement and Persecution Types giving us their unbiased opinions. I feel so much safer now

Prosecutors from the DOJ's Civil Rights Division and U.S. attorney's office for the District of Columbia argued the pro-life activists violated the 1994 FACE Act, a federal law that prohibits physical force, threats of force or intentionally damaging property to prevent someone from obtaining or providing abortion services.

Yeah, dangerous criminals those grandmas and grandpas. Lock 'em up!!

dimocraps are the scum of the Earth. The worst ones are the ones that vote gutless scum into Office

 

[Marener]

Of course it doesn’t, it’s highly persevere case law.

With that said, Jack could have continued in DC, but couldn’t get his case to trial, and had to resign in disgrace

Smith couldn’t have continued to pursue criminal cases against a sitting president. The DoJ policy, which he is bound to follow, forbids it.

If Trump had lost, the cases would be ongoing.

 

[Marener]

Yeah, here's one of those extremely violent right wingers that got pardoned by OMB

Pro-life activist prosecuted by Biden DOJ reacts to Trump pardon: 'I want to give him a hug'

Pro-life grandmother Joan Bell, sentenced in November 2023 for blocking a D.C. abortion clinic in 2020, was one of the nearly two dozen activists pardoned by President Donald Trump.

www.foxnews.com

She was arrested for praying in front of an abortion clinic. What a criminal, huh!!?!

Bell, who lives in New Jersey, was sentenced to more than two years in prison in November 2023 for participating in a "blockade," conspiring with other activists at a Washington D.C. abortion clinic in October 2020, according to President Biden's Department of Justice (DOJ).

When Joan Bell, 76, was given the news she was one of the pro-life activists pardoned by President Donald Trump Thursday afternoon, she was in disbelief

"Many, many of them are elderly people," Trump said in the Oval Office. "They should not have been prosecuted. This is a great honor to sign this. They'll be very happy."

Bell, along with Paula Paulette Harlow, Jean Marshall and John Hinshaw, were all around 70 years old when they were imprisoned.

Yeah, lock those dangerous criminals up!!!

And here's your very brave, extremely courageous Law Enforcement and Persecution Types giving us their unbiased opinions. I feel so much safer now

Prosecutors from the DOJ's Civil Rights Division and U.S. attorney's office for the District of Columbia argued the pro-life activists violated the 1994 FACE Act, a federal law that prohibits physical force, threats of force or intentionally damaging property to prevent someone from obtaining or providing abortion services.

Yeah, dangerous criminals those grandmas and grandpas. Lock 'em up!!

dimocraps are the scum of the Earth. The worst ones are the ones that vote gutless scum into Office

Laws don’t apply to old people?

 

[struth]

Smith couldn’t have continued to pursue criminal cases against a sitting president. The DoJ policy, which he is bound to follow, forbids it.

If Trump had lost, the cases would be ongoing.

I know he couldn’t, he had no case and was illegally appointed

Xiden was furious with him for not getting his polltical rival jailed before the election., that’s why he didn’t pardon him. Jack is likely heading back to Europe to escape prosecution, like he did after he politically prosecuted Obama’s rival

 

[Marener]

I know he couldn’t, he had no case and was illegally appointed

Xiden was furious with him for not getting his polltical rival jailed before the election., that’s why he didn’t pardon him. Jack is likely heading back to Europe to escape prosecution, like he did after he politically prosecuted Obama’s rival

You lied about why he dropped the case.