So, How is This Going To Work?

I never said he would be arrested in any red states. What part of red states probably would not arrest, did you fail to understand? Stay calm. Everything will be alright.
View attachment 1214164
Which one of these do you currently take?

First you claim that blue states like Minnesota would prosecute ICE agents and then when shown that red states would not extradite them and they could not do so, you deflected and then said they couldn't prosecute them. Which is it?

When did you get your Alzheimer's diagnosis? We all have known you are suffering from dementia for a long time now. You cannot remember what you type even when we quote your posts back to you! You are probably taking all three, but don't remember!
 
No. You’re totally wrong.

That you’re a hack only involves your hyperbolic and false rhetoric.
1770047625415.webp
 
Fox tends to annoy the daylights out of me. They post a Headline, then change it within minutes, sometimes seconds, to mean something totally different.

The original Headline said they were going to arrest them..... :dunno:


Chicago mayor Brandon Johnson puts ICE ‘on notice’ with executive order seeking prosecution of agents​


Typical dim bluster. I know Cops. Lots of them. And there is no way they're going to try to arrest a Federal Agent armed with a (probably) a Full Automatic weapon. No way. They'll run like Bunnies if a Federal Officer points an M4 at them, much less fires it. They'll crap themselves if they get fired at

It just ain't gonna happen. But I'd pay to see it unfold
Are you actually implying the federal agent would murder the cop who came to put him under arrest, instead of simply cooperating with the process?
 
Local laws cannot supersede federal laws. If the actions of any federal agents were within what is allowable under federal law, the local politicians and law enforcement have to just suck it up.
Nope, break state laws you can be arrested...

So enter a person's home without a warrant (or proper cause), you are breaking both State and Federal law... State can arrest you...

My view is even simpler, ye are a bunch of masked guys with no badges breaking into someone's house in halloween costumes.... Local cop can say, I had to arrest until I could verify that they were federal officers... We thought real suspicious that federal officers didn't know the constitution (that's probable cause)...
 
Fox tends to annoy the daylights out of me. They post a Headline, then change it within minutes, sometimes seconds, to mean something totally different.

The original Headline said they were going to arrest them..... :dunno:


Chicago mayor Brandon Johnson puts ICE ‘on notice’ with executive order seeking prosecution of agents​


Typical dim bluster. I know Cops. Lots of them. And there is no way they're going to try to arrest a Federal Agent armed with a (probably) a Full Automatic weapon. No way. They'll run like Bunnies if a Federal Officer points an M4 at them, much less fires it. They'll crap themselves if they get fired at

It just ain't gonna happen. But I'd pay to see it unfold
Perhaps you should stop watching Fox, like intelligent people have.
 
When they go outisde those rules, that's different. If an ICE Officer robs a Convenience store, he might be able to be prosecuted by the State but it's not easy to do. If an ICE Officer is on duty and robs a store, I doubt the State would have any success prosecuting him.
Doesn't work that way... Nobody has absolute immunity....

State Police has the right to enforce the law even to a federal officer...


First, as the historical examples in Part I indicate, federal officials are not categorically immune from state criminal prosecution, even while on duty.[50] For example, a marine who hit and killed someone after failing to yield the right of way could be prosecuted for vehicular homicide under state law—he was not immune just because he was driving in a military convoy.[51] But there is immunity if the federal official’s actions are necessary to carrying out a lawful federal duty. For example, in another driving-related case, a court held that a federal officer was immune from state enforcement of speeding laws while pursuing a fleeing suspect, so long as he acted with reasonable care and prudence in the circumstances.[52]
 
If they committed crimes they get prosecuted, If not nothing happens. You're American and you can't figure that out. Go back to school
Who says they won'tget prosecuted, dickface?

Probably not by the State. By the Federal Government. If the Feds wish, at their discretion, they may turn them over to the State. But only at their discretioin. Get it?

Didn't think so.
 
Fox have Judge Jennie for their advice:
Opinions due vary. Especially when getting such from Leftwing NPR.
I prefer The Epoch Times for general news, other professional and/or trade publications when wanting more specific and informed, objective.
&
 
Fox tends to annoy the daylights out of me. They post a Headline, then change it within minutes, sometimes seconds, to mean something totally different.

I would suggest avoiding Fox.

That is how much of media works, within the so-called mainstream and otherwise. An article is composed and then a headline writer provides the incentive to attract readers. I'm not sure if the practice had a label before these recent times when it has now become referred to as clickbait.
 
Which one of these do you currently take?

First you claim that blue states like Minnesota would prosecute ICE agents and then when shown that red states would not extradite them and they could not do so, you deflected and then said they couldn't prosecute them. Which is it?

When did you get your Alzheimer's diagnosis? We all have known you are suffering from dementia for a long time now. You cannot remember what you type even when we quote your posts back to you! You are probably taking all three, but don't remember!
You cannot effectively prosecute if not able to compel appearance, as prosecution in absentia is not something we do. So, for now, that is where it will stay, as investigation continues, but that is, for now, only.
 
You cannot effectively prosecute if not able to compel appearance, as prosecution in absentia is not something we do. So, for now, that is where it will stay, as investigation continues, but that is, for now, only.
There you go destroying your own posts. This is 180 degrees out of what you initially posted. Thank you for your hypocrisy.
 
There you go destroying your own posts. This is 180 degrees out of what you initially posted. Thank you for your hypocrisy.
Not destroying at all, just acknowleged the temporary political situation. You seem to live in the land of illusions, where it will not change.
 
15th post
Not destroying at all, just acknowleged the temporary political situation. You seem to live in the land of illusions, where it will not change.
I think he's having trouble adjusting to civilian life where 'Rank Has Its Privileges' doesn't exist.

Happens to a lot of people. A lot
 
And being Canadian, you know all about that, eh? Not much about American juris prudence though.

"If they committed crimes they get prosecuted, If not nothing happens."

:laughing0301:

That's what i said. It works the same in your country silly boy or girl. They prosecute people who commit crimes. If a person doesn't commit a crime they don't get prosecuted. Of course they can be found not guilty in court.
 
Back
Top Bottom