Who shall investigate the investigators (a J6 committee update)!

[BackAgain]

https://conservativebrief.com/johnson-forms-88956/

I seek verification.

This is excellent.

 

[elektra]

I bet Liz Cheney ain't sleeping well

 

[elektra]

Pelosi is hoping she destroyed enough evidence to prevent her arrest

 

[sparky]

It's pretty hard to hide 80 million voters......~S~

 

[luiza]

You have to see a dark and hysterically funny side to this biggest ever "stitch up".

It had Cheney and Pelosi at the heart of matters .
How did Satan fix that?


Makes me think of Goering and Himmler organising an investigation into concentration camp deaths in that early 40s spat involving Germany and some upset Jewish people .

 

[konradv]

https://conservativebrief.com/johnson-forms-88956/

I seek verification.

This is excellent.

Can’t they tell the “committee” to pound sand?

 

[CrusaderFrank]

Can’t they tell the “committee” to pound sand?

Sure

Ask Steve Bannon

Ask Peter Navarro

 

[EMH]

I bet Liz Cheney ain't sleeping well

If that's all that investigates her, a Congressional committee packed with Dems and RINOs, she has nothing to worry about.

Kash and Pam start, she's facing FIRING SQUAD.

 

[konradv]

Sure

Ask Steve Bannon

Ask Peter Navarro

They’ve got pardons. Bannon didn’t.

 

[martybegan]

They’ve got pardons. Bannon didn’t.

Pardons for what they supposedly did (who knows), not for rejecting a congressional subpoena that would happen after they were pardoned, for something, they didn't do, but if they did, they were pardoned, for what, we don't know.

 

[CrusaderFrank]

They’ve got pardons. Bannon didn’t.

They got arrested and jailed. If "No one is above the law", then should be really interesting

 

[Oddball]

Can’t they tell the “committee” to pound sand?

Sure...Then they can go to the same cells that Navarro and Bannon were thrown into.

 

[konradv]

Sure...Then they can go to the same cells that Navarro and Bannon were thrown into.

They didn’t have pardons.

 

[Blaster]

The 1/6 committee was a gang of criminals.

 

[Blaster]

They didn’t have pardons.

They were both innocent.

 

[martybegan]

They didn’t have pardons.

That's meaningless. They would be supeonaed for testimony, not charged with a crime.

 

[konradv]

That's meaningless. They would be supeonaed for testimony, not charged with a crime.

I’d tell them to pound sand.

 

[konradv]

They were both innocent.

 

[martybegan]

I’d tell them to pound sand.

The pardons don't protect them from contempt of congress charges brought after the pardons were given.

 

[konradv]

The pardons don't protect them from contempt of congress charges brought after the pardons were given.

Sure they do, They’re pre-emotive.