Who really cares?

[Plasmaball]

It only took two responses for someone to bring up BOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOSH!!!!!!!

Get a fucking grip people. This is 2014 not 2004. Pointing at the fuck ups of the past is no excuse for current fuck ups.

you want a tissue because context matters

 

[Remodeling Maidiac]

It only took two responses for someone to bring up BOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOSH!!!!!!!

Get a fucking grip people. This is 2014 not 2004. Pointing at the fuck ups of the past is no excuse for current fuck ups.

you want a tissue because context matters

In other words context is your excuse to be like all the other blame shifting trolls on here. Got it

 

[Plasmaball]

It only took two responses for someone to bring up BOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOSH!!!!!!!

Get a fucking grip people. This is 2014 not 2004. Pointing at the fuck ups of the past is no excuse for current fuck ups.

you want a tissue because context matters

In other words context is your excuse to be like all the other blame shifting trolls on here. Got it

ah...no....because none of these are scandals.

 

[TemplarKormac]

A bigger question [MENTION=20102]mudwhistle[/MENTION] is this...

"What difference at this point does it make?"

-Hillary Clinton

 

[AVG-JOE]

Squabbling over the R -vs- L bullshit while BOTH parties get grea$ed up by the same fucking people for another round of "Protect MY Special Interests".

​

I hate voting democrat, but the republicans leave me no choice with the way they cling to Trickle-Down Economics. Say what you will about George Bush Jr... his administration proved beyond a shadow of a doubt that his daddy was correct in referring to Reganomics as "Voodoo Economics".

oh, just stop lying.

you LOVE voting dimocrap.

otherwise you won't do it.

Wow. Do you REALLY think you know me well enough to judge me? Really?

Do you LOVE voting republican, or do you too wish for better choices?

I'm asking, 'cause I don't know enough about what makes you tick to judge you, and I'll freely admit it.

I've voted for more R's than D's in my adult life and, if the republicans ever renounce Trickle-Down Economics, I'll take another look at the party. In the meantime I'll be looking at how much I can trust individual candidates who profess a desire for fair and simple taxes and a balanced budget to see if one with an R might warrant my vote that way.

Until then, I will continue to pull a reluctant lever for the democrats and push for tax reform and a balanced budget as I discuss politics.

 

[mudwhistle]

Squabbling over the R -vs- L bullshit while BOTH parties get grea$ed up by the same fucking people for another round of "Protect MY Special Interests".

​

I hate voting democrat, but the republicans leave me no choice with the way they cling to Trickle-Down Economics. Say what you will about George Bush Jr... his administration proved beyond a shadow of a doubt that his daddy was correct in referring to Reganomics as "Voodoo Economics".

oh, just stop lying.

you LOVE voting dimocrap.

otherwise you won't do it.

Wow. Do you REALLY think you know me well enough to judge me? Really?

Do you LOVE voting republican, or do you too wish for better choices?

I'm asking, 'cause I don't know enough about what makes you tick to judge you, and I'll freely admit it.

I've voted for more R's than D's in my adult life and, if the republicans ever renounce Trickle-Down Economics, I'll take another look at the party. In the meantime I'll be looking at how much I can trust individual candidates who profess a desire for fair and simple taxes and a balanced budget to see if one with an R might warrant my vote that way.

Until then, I will continue to pull a reluctant lever for the democrats and push for tax reform and a balanced budget as I discuss politics.

Looks like Obama is introducing Trickle-up economics with his unemployment claims.

 

[koshergrl]

These rightwing inmates cling to their invented scandals like a neurotic house dog clinging to his stuffed animal fuck buddy.

"
scan·dal
ˈskandl/
noun
noun: scandal; plural noun: scandals
1.
an action or event regarded as morally or legally wrong and causing general public outrage."

 

[Duped]

Liberals have a sensory block when it comes to anything that cast blame on their savior; they are a cult following. A slight thing is huge to them when it inculpates a conservative, but calamity is dismissed when a liberal is to blame. So the only people who care are not liberals; they don't have the integrity it takes to care - they are pure political ideologues, and low information voters.

Their are millions who do care; so justice will be pursued through every legal recourse to exhaustion!

 

[AVG-JOE]

oh, just stop lying.

you LOVE voting dimocrap.

otherwise you won't do it.

Wow. Do you REALLY think you know me well enough to judge me? Really?

Do you LOVE voting republican, or do you too wish for better choices?

I'm asking, 'cause I don't know enough about what makes you tick to judge you, and I'll freely admit it.

I've voted for more R's than D's in my adult life and, if the republicans ever renounce Trickle-Down Economics, I'll take another look at the party. In the meantime I'll be looking at how much I can trust individual candidates who profess a desire for fair and simple taxes and a balanced budget to see if one with an R might warrant my vote that way.

Until then, I will continue to pull a reluctant lever for the democrats and push for tax reform and a balanced budget as I discuss politics.

Looks like Obama is introducing Trickle-up economics with his unemployment claims.

Label it what you will, history will record Obama as a mediocre + president. I'm still glad I voted for him over the poster-boy for Trickle-Down Economics: Mitt Romney. And, given similar choices under similar circumstances, I'd do it again.

What's next?

​

[ame=http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=umrp1tIBY8Q]Sonny & Cher The Beat Goes On - YouTube[/ame]

 

[Remodeling Maidiac]

Wow. Do you REALLY think you know me well enough to judge me? Really?

Do you LOVE voting republican, or do you too wish for better choices?

I'm asking, 'cause I don't know enough about what makes you tick to judge you, and I'll freely admit it.

I've voted for more R's than D's in my adult life and, if the republicans ever renounce Trickle-Down Economics, I'll take another look at the party. In the meantime I'll be looking at how much I can trust individual candidates who profess a desire for fair and simple taxes and a balanced budget to see if one with an R might warrant my vote that way.

Until then, I will continue to pull a reluctant lever for the democrats and push for tax reform and a balanced budget as I discuss politics.

Looks like Obama is introducing Trickle-up economics with his unemployment claims.

Label it what you will, history will record Obama as a mediocre + president. I'm still glad I voted for him over the poster-boy for Trickle-Down Economics: Mitt Romney. And, given similar choices under similar circumstances, I'd do it again.

What's next?

​

[ame=http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=umrp1tIBY8Q]Sonny & Cher The Beat Goes On - YouTube[/ame]

The fact that you would do it again removes any respect I had for you.

Trickle down, trickel up, it makes no difference. The wealthy do well in both but you only criticize one method.

Trickle down the poor get a chance

Trickle up and the poor stay poor as well as under the thumb of handouts.

The fact that you claim to be an independent who has voted more republican than democrat but then freely admits you would vote for Obama AGAIN just makes you a COMPLETE LIAR & IDIOT.

 

[AVG-JOE]

Squabbling over the R -vs- L bullshit while BOTH parties get grea$ed up by the same fucking people for another round of "Protect MY Special Interests".

​

I hate voting democrat, but the republicans leave me no choice with the way they cling to Trickle-Down Economics. Say what you will about George Bush Jr... his administration proved beyond a shadow of a doubt that his daddy was correct in referring to Reganomics as "Voodoo Economics".

I understand. I used to feel the same way until it was brought to my attn that voting for the lesser of two evils was still evil & that voting for politicians in those two parties merely encourages them. I'm making a stand by not voting which would legitimize their thievery. You hear about Ney's new book?: http://www.usmessageboard.com/curre...ewers-establ-repubs-especially-boehner-r.html

It's not really supposed to be an 'us -vs- them' kind of a thing... One participates.

You start with taking as much of an interest in the primaries as you can and you follow it through to the general.

Like I said, given the circumstances and the choice between Romney and Obama, I wouldn't change my mind. Obviously Obama is not the Fair & Simple Taxes and Balanced Public Budgets hero that I'm hoping to see before I die, but Romney, with his adherence to Trickle-Down Economics, was simply not an option.


I don't give a shit about the past.... victories or mistakes, the past doesn't matter... I want to know "What's next?"

 

[AVG-JOE]

Looks like Obama is introducing Trickle-up economics with his unemployment claims.

Label it what you will, history will record Obama as a mediocre + president. I'm still glad I voted for him over the poster-boy for Trickle-Down Economics: Mitt Romney. And, given similar choices under similar circumstances, I'd do it again.

What's next?

​

[ame=http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=umrp1tIBY8Q]Sonny & Cher The Beat Goes On - YouTube[/ame]

The fact that you would do it again removes any respect I had for you.

Trickle down, trickel up, it makes no difference. The wealthy do well in both but you only criticize one method.

Trickle down the poor get a chance

Trickle up and the poor stay poor as well as under the thumb of handouts.

The fact that you claim to be an independent who has voted more republican than democrat but then freely admits you would vote for Obama AGAIN just makes you a COMPLETE LIAR & IDIOT.

I'm LYING about my opinion, eh?

​

Dude... that's impossible!

 

[Remodeling Maidiac]

Label it what you will, history will record Obama as a mediocre + president. I'm still glad I voted for him over the poster-boy for Trickle-Down Economics: Mitt Romney. And, given similar choices under similar circumstances, I'd do it again.

What's next?

​

Sonny & Cher The Beat Goes On - YouTube

The fact that you would do it again removes any respect I had for you.

Trickle down, trickel up, it makes no difference. The wealthy do well in both but you only criticize one method.

Trickle down the poor get a chance

Trickle up and the poor stay poor as well as under the thumb of handouts.

The fact that you claim to be an independent who has voted more republican than democrat but then freely admits you would vote for Obama AGAIN just makes you a COMPLETE LIAR & IDIOT.

I'm LYING about my opinion, eh?

​

Dude... that's impossible!

You're lying about being a middle of the road American. Should have been obvious that you're so worried about how you are perceived that you try to mask it with your user name.

A liar indeed. Possibly even to yourself.

 

[AVG-JOE]

I've never labeled myself. I just speak my ever-changing opinion.



What's next?!?

 

[flacaltenn]

Squabbling over the R -vs- L bullshit while BOTH parties get grea$ed up by the same fucking people for another round of "Protect MY Special Interests".

​

I hate voting democrat, but the republicans leave me no choice with the way they cling to Trickle-Down Economics. Say what you will about George Bush Jr... his administration proved beyond a shadow of a doubt that his daddy was correct in referring to Reganomics as "Voodoo Economics".

Then dont REWARD the left and right with your vote. I worked very hard to give you a candidate in 2012 who was a successful 2 term governor from New Mexico on 48 state ballots Yeah its true he had the personality of a banana slug, but if you want personality -- draft Colbert.
A proven admin who would use US force more wisely abroad, attack corporate welfare and advance freedom and choice.. It a death spiral of incompetence and unaccountability. So quit whining and send a message...

Before folks like me get tired of leaping mountains to give you a choice... If you like 2 parties THAT MUCH -- then ill have more time to golf and type on USMB...

 

[flacaltenn]

Every one of the complaints in the OP are VALID concerns and scandals. The list is nowhere long enough. And BOTH your damn parties use the same infantile arguments and excuses to attempt to defuse them or call them phoney..

1) THEY did it first. (((Or did it worse)))
2) We found an inaccuracy in the news coverage. Therefore the scandal is phoney or never happened.
3) Congress investigated and couldnt indict anyone, therefore nothing happened. Even tho Congress couldnt investigate ANYTHING successfully.
4) No one gets fired or punished so --- see # 2 and 3 above.

Weve had enough.. There is no accountability. The bar of ethical performance is in free fall. If you believe you can wave off all these exqmples with same old tools --- we're nowhere NEAR that stupid.

 

[Quantum Windbag]

Who cares about how 4 embassy employees in Benghazi who were killed by rebels that the Obama administration armed.

Who cares about the IRS targeting every rightwing talk show host or PAC that donates to conservatives.

Who cares that the DoJ is shaking down banks, insurance companies, and big businesses for cash through lawsuits.

Who cares that guns the Obama Administration gave to drug cartels are still turning up at crime scenes along the border.

Who cares that the Administration refuses to enforce our laws or enforces them selectively.

Who cares that our government has brought down several dictators in the Middle East and allowed Islamic radicals to take over in their place.

Who cares that not only is the Administration allowing Iran, our mortal enemy, to continue building nukes, but they're also scaring everyone else in the region into wanting them for their own defense, seeing as how they can't count on us to protect them anymore.

Obama likes the fact that more are not working than in the last 30 years. For every job created last month 5 people dropped out of the workforce and cannot be counted as part of the ever growing terminally unemployed. Obama sees this as progress, a strong economy, strengthening the Middle-Class. He claims that unemployment is good for the economy. His primary concern isn't that more aren't working but that they aren't all making the same income. He says that his website isn't indicative of the mess his administration has become. The fact that not only can't he be trusted to keep his promises but even when he does do what he says he'll do it always turns into a hassle to everyone involved.

Who cares that with every new rule or regulation the costs of running a business goes up astronomically and the costs to the consumer goes up as well. Who cares that the EPA is intentionally driving the costs of energy through the roof.

Who cares.

The worst thing you could do is hold up traffic in NYC. This is the worst thing you can ever do. This is just the tip of the iceberg folks. More will come out about this, they promise us. This is one seriously huge scandal of all scandals. Somebody cause a traffic jam on the GWB and people died, or at least probably died. This can't happen in America. But when it comes to national security and the stagnant economy. Who cares.

At this point, what difference does it make?

 

[Quantum Windbag]

Who cares about how 4 embassy employees in Benghazi who were killed by rebels that the Obama administration armed.

Who cares about the IRS targeting every rightwing talk show host or PAC that donates to conservatives.

Who cares that the DoJ is shaking down banks, insurance companies, and big businesses for cash through lawsuits.

Who cares that guns the Obama Administration gave to drug cartels are still turning up at crime scenes along the border.

Who cares that the Administration refuses to enforce our laws or enforces them selectively.

Who cares that our government has brought down several dictators in the Middle East and allowed Islamic radicals to take over in their place.

Who cares that not only is the Administration allowing Iran, our mortal enemy, to continue building nukes, but they're also scaring everyone else in the region into wanting them for their own defense, seeing as how they can't count on us to protect them anymore.

Obama likes the fact that more are not working than in the last 30 years. For every job created last month 5 people dropped out of the workforce and cannot be counted as part of the ever growing terminally unemployed. Obama sees this as progress, a strong economy, strengthening the Middle-Class. He claims that unemployment is good for the economy. His primary concern isn't that more aren't working but that they aren't all making the same income. He says that his website isn't indicative of the mess his administration has become. The fact that not only can't he be trusted to keep his promises but even when he does do what he says he'll do it always turns into a hassle to everyone involved.

Who cares that with every new rule or regulation the costs of running a business goes up astronomically and the costs to the consumer goes up as well. Who cares that the EPA is intentionally driving the costs of energy through the roof.

Who cares.

The worst thing you could do is hold up traffic in NYC. This is the worst thing you can ever do. This is just the tip of the iceberg folks. More will come out about this, they promise us. This is one seriously huge scandal of all scandals. Somebody cause a traffic jam on the GWB and people died, or at least probably died. This can't happen in America. But when it comes to national security and the stagnant economy. Who cares.

See, they have nothing so the must bring up Obama instead of defending someone they dont like.

1) Bush had 52 Attacks, where is your thread on that?
2) They went after liberal groups as well, but i really dont care that you who racial profile was profiled.
3)yawn, shake down lol.....
4) im sure they did
5) Most tend to do this, hell cops do this everyday. Maybe you should write someone a letter?
6) brought down? you have zero proof of this.
7) yes thats exactly whats happening.
8)no he doesnt
9)Awww you cant be an asshole and pollute the way you want...tissue

I gave you short answers because for the most part the OP is partisan lying and talking points.

1. Last time I looked Bush stepped being president 5 years ago. In other words, Bush is so 2000.
2. How many liberal groups did they go after again? Was it 5?
3. What do you call it when you extort money from someone for something that someone else did? That's right, you call that taxes.
4. I am sure you are lying.
5. I am sure you have a point there. Let me rephrase that, I am sure you think you have one.
6. Obama didn't bring down Qaddafi and Mubarak? Can I go back and tell your past self that he was wrong about giving Obama credit for those things?
7. No proof that Iran wants to build nukes? Let me guess, you also demand proof that Obama is currently president.
8. If he doesn't like it why not go back to policies that have worked in the past? Do you honestly think that, if he really cared, he would promote his policies over the jobs of real people?
9. Tell me something, what do the new regulations that require schools to not serve turkey sandwiches on whole wheat bread have to do with pollution? Be specific, because no one else in the universe sees the connection.

You gave short answers because you are exactly what you claim the OP is, a partisan hack spouting lies and talking points..

 

[Quantum Windbag]

^ that.

take your partisan, rw-blinders off muddy

Firebug (R-CA) gave it his best shot- spending MILLIONS of taxpayer $$$'s & releasing still classified data and came up empty handed

Partisan hack supports partisan hack, is anyone surprised?

 

[Quantum Windbag]

It only took two responses for someone to bring up BOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOSH!!!!!!!

Get a fucking grip people. This is 2014 not 2004. Pointing at the fuck ups of the past is no excuse for current fuck ups.

you want a tissue because context matters

If contest matters feel free to drop into the thread I posted today discussing the Obama recovery and discuss the context.

My guess is that context only matters when you get to define the context, not when you have to deal with reality.