Who made the decision to bomb Syria without Congressional consent?

mudwhistle

Diamond Member
Joined
Jul 21, 2009
Messages
100,258
Reaction score
29,326
Points
2,220
Location
Tested Negative For COVID-19
Hate to break it to you....but Bush, Clinton, and Obama are on the same team.
Bush, Clinton nor Obama never aided ISIS, but they did play for the same team. Like McCain, Romney, Dole, GH Bush, Raygun, Carter.........even Nixon.

Unlike the Trumpybear who played for. ,....drum roll.........um ........well,,,,,,,,,,uh ,,,, Trump.
Then explain why we've been in one war in the ME after another since Bush Senior was in the WH?

Probably because they're helping the military establishment get rich.
 

Rigby5

Gold Member
Joined
Apr 23, 2017
Messages
8,869
Reaction score
2,089
Points
170
Location
New Mexico
Who made that call? Biden?
I bet there are alot of people in Europe that want to kick Obama & Biden's ass for that decision.
Six million Syrian refugees had already fled before the US got involved. Mehr Assad had dropped thousands of barrel bombs on civilians.

Wrong.
The US was ALWAYS involved and was responsible for STARTING the whole civil war in Syria.
It was Hillary's "Arab Spring" concept to wipe out all the legitimate governments in the Mideast, like Saddam, Qaddafi, Assad, Morsi, etc.
Nope.. Severe drought settled on Syria in 2005. The farmers abandoned their farms and moved to the cities with high unemployment and the oil sector finally collapsed. Mehr Assad is in charge and he's as savage as his father Hayfez was. I am surprised you don't know anything about Syria or its history of sectarian strife and assassinations.
Assad had nothing to do with those problems, and starting a civil war can not possibly help those economic problems.
But the rebels suddenly had expensive weapons and new Toyota trucks.
Who was funding them?
Who was Ambassador Stevens meeting in Benghazi, and what was in the CIA annex warehouse there?
The ambassador had dinner with the Turkish envoy, but he was in town to dedicate the new joint venture in emergency services between Mass General and Benghazi Hospital the next morning.

Assad arrested and tortured the schoolboys .. that's when all hell broke loose all over the Syria.

The annex was a communication operation to identify which tribes might support a return to the Idris constitution.
I don't buy that for a second.
Benghazi was much too dangerous, full of al Qaeda and ISIS.
The only reason Stevens could possibly have for being in Benghazi, so far from protection, would be to meet with Syrian rebels or those who could be recruited to fight somewhere, as the US wanted.
It was an obvious risk and would only have been done for some covert reason.

Nor does the US need a communications operations in Benghazi.
Radio can be done anywhere, or from satellite even.
The CIA annex warehouse could only have been for things like weapons, vehicles, and money.
That should not have been there.

And by the way, there are NO tribes in Benghazi. The coast had all been taken over by dangerous refugee groups.
The tribes in Libya live further south in the hill country.
And Stevens was not at all interested in the tribal leaders, who do not like the US.
Stevens was there to recover some shoulder-fired surface to air missiles Obama sold to rebels and ended up being used against us.
They knew this because one of them was fired at one of our choppers...and the numbskulls forgot to set the fuse...so they got the serial number off of it.
Benghazi was a coverup mission that totally backfired.
This is what happens when your president is a backstabbing treasonous communist.
Could be.
I have no way of ever knowing for sure.
But clearly someone was giving ISIS and Syrian rebels lot of weapons and new Toyota trucks.
 

Rigby5

Gold Member
Joined
Apr 23, 2017
Messages
8,869
Reaction score
2,089
Points
170
Location
New Mexico
Who made that call? Biden?
I bet there are alot of people in Europe that want to kick Obama & Biden's ass for that decision.
Six million Syrian refugees had already fled before the US got involved. Mehr Assad had dropped thousands of barrel bombs on civilians.

Wrong.
The US was ALWAYS involved and was responsible for STARTING the whole civil war in Syria.
It was Hillary's "Arab Spring" concept to wipe out all the legitimate governments in the Mideast, like Saddam, Qaddafi, Assad, Morsi, etc.
Nope.. Severe drought settled on Syria in 2005. The farmers abandoned their farms and moved to the cities with high unemployment and the oil sector finally collapsed. Mehr Assad is in charge and he's as savage as his father Hayfez was. I am surprised you don't know anything about Syria or its history of sectarian strife and assassinations.
Assad had nothing to do with those problems, and starting a civil war can not possibly help those economic problems.
But the rebels suddenly had expensive weapons and new Toyota trucks.
Who was funding them?
Who was Ambassador Stevens meeting in Benghazi, and what was in the CIA annex warehouse there?
The ambassador had dinner with the Turkish envoy, but he was in town to dedicate the new joint venture in emergency services between Mass General and Benghazi Hospital the next morning.

Assad arrested and tortured the schoolboys .. that's when all hell broke loose all over the Syria.

The annex was a communication operation to identify which tribes might support a return to the Idris constitution.
I don't buy that for a second.
Benghazi was much too dangerous, full of al Qaeda and ISIS.
The only reason Stevens could possibly have for being in Benghazi, so far from protection, would be to meet with Syrian rebels or those who could be recruited to fight somewhere, as the US wanted.
It was an obvious risk and would only have been done for some covert reason.

Nor does the US need a communications operations in Benghazi.
Radio can be done anywhere, or from satellite even.
The CIA annex warehouse could only have been for things like weapons, vehicles, and money.
That should not have been there.

And by the way, there are NO tribes in Benghazi. The coast had all been taken over by dangerous refugee groups.
The tribes in Libya live further south in the hill country.
And Stevens was not at all interested in the tribal leaders, who do not like the US.
Stevens was there to recover some shoulder-fired surface to air missiles Obama sold to rebels and ended up being used against us.
They knew this because of them was fired at one of our choppers...and the numbskulls forgot to set the fuse...so they got the serial number off of it.
Benghazi was a coverup mission that totally backfired.
What difference, at this point, does it make? ;)
Because if the US was arming Syrian rebels, we need to stop it, because it is stupid and a crime.
 

BlindBoo

Platinum Member
Joined
Sep 28, 2010
Messages
37,451
Reaction score
6,216
Points
1,130
Who made that call? Biden?
I bet there are alot of people in Europe that want to kick Obama & Biden's ass for that decision.
Six million Syrian refugees had already fled before the US got involved. Mehr Assad had dropped thousands of barrel bombs on civilians.

Wrong.
The US was ALWAYS involved and was responsible for STARTING the whole civil war in Syria.
It was Hillary's "Arab Spring" concept to wipe out all the legitimate governments in the Mideast, like Saddam, Qaddafi, Assad, Morsi, etc.
Nope.. Severe drought settled on Syria in 2005. The farmers abandoned their farms and moved to the cities with high unemployment and the oil sector finally collapsed. Mehr Assad is in charge and he's as savage as his father Hayfez was. I am surprised you don't know anything about Syria or its history of sectarian strife and assassinations.
Assad had nothing to do with those problems, and starting a civil war can not possibly help those economic problems.
But the rebels suddenly had expensive weapons and new Toyota trucks.
Who was funding them?
Who was Ambassador Stevens meeting in Benghazi, and what was in the CIA annex warehouse there?
The ambassador had dinner with the Turkish envoy, but he was in town to dedicate the new joint venture in emergency services between Mass General and Benghazi Hospital the next morning.

Assad arrested and tortured the schoolboys .. that's when all hell broke loose all over the Syria.

The annex was a communication operation to identify which tribes might support a return to the Idris constitution.
This is just a normal day in the Middle East.......and something we need to stay out of. Both sides in an Islamic War are guilty of war crimes. We shouldn't take sides. That is why we were attacked on 911.
The only real ally we have in the ME is Israel.
Where have you lived in the Middle East?
I've been deployed there several times. Egypt, Kuwait, and other Islamic countries. Stayed in Somalia for most of 1993.
Good. The Soviets never had a presence in KSA, Kuwait, Bahrain, Qatar or the UAE.. They did try to get a foothold in Yemen in the 1960s.

Israel isn't an ally.. Look at how much foreign aid we have given them since 1948. The Saudis have been a steadfast ally since the late 1930s and they don't get any foreign aid.
Yeah....but Carter literally gave Iran to Russia.
Sure, that's why RayGun was selling them US Missiles and spares for their US weapons.
Hate to break it to you....but Bush, Clinton, and Obama are on the same team.
Bush, Clinton nor Obama never aided ISIS, but they did play for the same team. Like McCain, Romney, Dole, GH Bush, Raygun, Carter.........even Nixon.

Unlike the Trumpybear who played for. ,....drum roll.........um ........well,,,,,,,,,,uh ,,,, Trump.
Then explain why we've been in one war in the ME after another since Bush Senior was in the WH?

Probably because they're helping the military establishment get rich.
"Let our position be absolutely clear: An attempt by any outside force to gain control of the Persian Gulf region will be regarded as an assault on the vital interests of the United States of America, and such an assault will be repelled by any means necessary, including military force."

The guy who wrote that, is also rumored to be the one who got the intel about Iran's weakness to Iraq's intelligence service and started that 8 year war too.

The goal is to keep the oil rich sands in hands friendly to the USA and our business partners in the West.

ISIS was not that.
 

mudwhistle

Diamond Member
Joined
Jul 21, 2009
Messages
100,258
Reaction score
29,326
Points
2,220
Location
Tested Negative For COVID-19
Who made that call? Biden?
I bet there are alot of people in Europe that want to kick Obama & Biden's ass for that decision.
Six million Syrian refugees had already fled before the US got involved. Mehr Assad had dropped thousands of barrel bombs on civilians.

Wrong.
The US was ALWAYS involved and was responsible for STARTING the whole civil war in Syria.
It was Hillary's "Arab Spring" concept to wipe out all the legitimate governments in the Mideast, like Saddam, Qaddafi, Assad, Morsi, etc.
Nope.. Severe drought settled on Syria in 2005. The farmers abandoned their farms and moved to the cities with high unemployment and the oil sector finally collapsed. Mehr Assad is in charge and he's as savage as his father Hayfez was. I am surprised you don't know anything about Syria or its history of sectarian strife and assassinations.
Assad had nothing to do with those problems, and starting a civil war can not possibly help those economic problems.
But the rebels suddenly had expensive weapons and new Toyota trucks.
Who was funding them?
Who was Ambassador Stevens meeting in Benghazi, and what was in the CIA annex warehouse there?
The ambassador had dinner with the Turkish envoy, but he was in town to dedicate the new joint venture in emergency services between Mass General and Benghazi Hospital the next morning.

Assad arrested and tortured the schoolboys .. that's when all hell broke loose all over the Syria.

The annex was a communication operation to identify which tribes might support a return to the Idris constitution.
I don't buy that for a second.
Benghazi was much too dangerous, full of al Qaeda and ISIS.
The only reason Stevens could possibly have for being in Benghazi, so far from protection, would be to meet with Syrian rebels or those who could be recruited to fight somewhere, as the US wanted.
It was an obvious risk and would only have been done for some covert reason.

Nor does the US need a communications operations in Benghazi.
Radio can be done anywhere, or from satellite even.
The CIA annex warehouse could only have been for things like weapons, vehicles, and money.
That should not have been there.

And by the way, there are NO tribes in Benghazi. The coast had all been taken over by dangerous refugee groups.
The tribes in Libya live further south in the hill country.
And Stevens was not at all interested in the tribal leaders, who do not like the US.
Stevens was there to recover some shoulder-fired surface to air missiles Obama sold to rebels and ended up being used against us.
They knew this because one of them was fired at one of our choppers...and the numbskulls forgot to set the fuse...so they got the serial number off of it.
Benghazi was a coverup mission that totally backfired.
This is what happens when your president is a backstabbing treasonous communist.
Could be.
I have no way of ever knowing for sure.
But clearly someone was giving ISIS and Syrian rebels lot of weapons and new Toyota trucks.
John McCain spearheaded that operation....at the behest of the Obama administration.
 

surada

Platinum Member
Joined
Jan 3, 2021
Messages
8,572
Reaction score
4,436
Points
893
Who made that call? Biden?
I bet there are alot of people in Europe that want to kick Obama & Biden's ass for that decision.
Six million Syrian refugees had already fled before the US got involved. Mehr Assad had dropped thousands of barrel bombs on civilians.

Wrong.
The US was ALWAYS involved and was responsible for STARTING the whole civil war in Syria.
It was Hillary's "Arab Spring" concept to wipe out all the legitimate governments in the Mideast, like Saddam, Qaddafi, Assad, Morsi, etc.
Nope.. Severe drought settled on Syria in 2005. The farmers abandoned their farms and moved to the cities with high unemployment and the oil sector finally collapsed. Mehr Assad is in charge and he's as savage as his father Hayfez was. I am surprised you don't know anything about Syria or its history of sectarian strife and assassinations.
Assad had nothing to do with those problems, and starting a civil war can not possibly help those economic problems.
But the rebels suddenly had expensive weapons and new Toyota trucks.
Who was funding them?
Who was Ambassador Stevens meeting in Benghazi, and what was in the CIA annex warehouse there?
The ambassador had dinner with the Turkish envoy, but he was in town to dedicate the new joint venture in emergency services between Mass General and Benghazi Hospital the next morning.

Assad arrested and tortured the schoolboys .. that's when all hell broke loose all over the Syria.

The annex was a communication operation to identify which tribes might support a return to the Idris constitution.
I don't buy that for a second.
Benghazi was much too dangerous, full of al Qaeda and ISIS.
The only reason Stevens could possibly have for being in Benghazi, so far from protection, would be to meet with Syrian rebels or those who could be recruited to fight somewhere, as the US wanted.
It was an obvious risk and would only have been done for some covert reason.

Nor does the US need a communications operations in Benghazi.
Radio can be done anywhere, or from satellite even.
The CIA annex warehouse could only have been for things like weapons, vehicles, and money.
That should not have been there.

And by the way, there are NO tribes in Benghazi. The coast had all been taken over by dangerous refugee groups.
The tribes in Libya live further south in the hill country.
And Stevens was not at all interested in the tribal leaders, who do not like the US.
Stevens was there to recover some shoulder-fired surface to air missiles Obama sold to rebels and ended up being used against us.
They knew this because of them was fired at one of our choppers...and the numbskulls forgot to set the fuse...so they got the serial number off of it.
Benghazi was a coverup mission that totally backfired.
What difference, at this point, does it make? ;)
Because if the US was arming Syrian rebels, we need to stop it, because it is stupid and a crime.
.
We were arming the Free Syrian Army .. sort of. They were defectors from the Syrian Army after Assad arrested and tortured the schoolboys in early 2011.


The Free Syrian Army (FSA) (Ais a loose faction in the Syrian Civil War founded on 29 July 2011 by officers of the Syrian Armed Forces whose stated goal was to bring down the government of Bashar al-Assad. A formal organization at its founding, its structure gradually dissipated by late 2012, and the FSA identity has since been used by various opposition forces…

FSA Forces — Free Syrian Army Platform -FSA Platform
The Free Syrian Army (FSA) is the moderate armed opposition fighting across Syria, to free the Syrian people from the Assad regime, its foreign militia and Daesh. The FSA formed in 2011 when peaceful protests in Syria were met with violent force from Syrian government forces.
 

Rigby5

Gold Member
Joined
Apr 23, 2017
Messages
8,869
Reaction score
2,089
Points
170
Location
New Mexico
Who made that call? Biden?
I bet there are alot of people in Europe that want to kick Obama & Biden's ass for that decision.
Six million Syrian refugees had already fled before the US got involved. Mehr Assad had dropped thousands of barrel bombs on civilians.

Wrong.
The US was ALWAYS involved and was responsible for STARTING the whole civil war in Syria.
It was Hillary's "Arab Spring" concept to wipe out all the legitimate governments in the Mideast, like Saddam, Qaddafi, Assad, Morsi, etc.
Nope.. Severe drought settled on Syria in 2005. The farmers abandoned their farms and moved to the cities with high unemployment and the oil sector finally collapsed. Mehr Assad is in charge and he's as savage as his father Hayfez was. I am surprised you don't know anything about Syria or its history of sectarian strife and assassinations.
Assad had nothing to do with those problems, and starting a civil war can not possibly help those economic problems.
But the rebels suddenly had expensive weapons and new Toyota trucks.
Who was funding them?
Who was Ambassador Stevens meeting in Benghazi, and what was in the CIA annex warehouse there?
The ambassador had dinner with the Turkish envoy, but he was in town to dedicate the new joint venture in emergency services between Mass General and Benghazi Hospital the next morning.

Assad arrested and tortured the schoolboys .. that's when all hell broke loose all over the Syria.

The annex was a communication operation to identify which tribes might support a return to the Idris constitution.
I don't buy that for a second.
Benghazi was much too dangerous, full of al Qaeda and ISIS.
The only reason Stevens could possibly have for being in Benghazi, so far from protection, would be to meet with Syrian rebels or those who could be recruited to fight somewhere, as the US wanted.
It was an obvious risk and would only have been done for some covert reason.

Nor does the US need a communications operations in Benghazi.
Radio can be done anywhere, or from satellite even.
The CIA annex warehouse could only have been for things like weapons, vehicles, and money.
That should not have been there.

And by the way, there are NO tribes in Benghazi. The coast had all been taken over by dangerous refugee groups.
The tribes in Libya live further south in the hill country.
And Stevens was not at all interested in the tribal leaders, who do not like the US.
Stevens was there to recover some shoulder-fired surface to air missiles Obama sold to rebels and ended up being used against us.
They knew this because one of them was fired at one of our choppers...and the numbskulls forgot to set the fuse...so they got the serial number off of it.
Benghazi was a coverup mission that totally backfired.
This is what happens when your president is a backstabbing treasonous communist.
LOLOL.. Gaddafi had been on a weapons buying spree in Europe and a year later in Russia.. to the tune of 4 billion so the country was awash in weapons. Stevens was NOT there to recover weapons.. He was an ambassador, for Christ's sake.. The Annex was staff with translators, interpreters, computer people to try and identify and communicate with Eastern tribes who might back a reinstatement of the Idris Constitution.

You are dumb as a stump.
The LAST place the US would go in order to connect with Libyans for stability, is Benghazi.
Benghazi had been over run with refugees from Palestine, Egypt, Syria, etc., for decades, and had nothing to do with the Libyan mainstream in Tripoli.

Sure Qaddafi had been buying lots of weapons, but those all ended up getting blown up in the desert when we massacred Qaddafi's forces.

And Libyan weapons were irrelevant to Stevens.
Clearly Steven's purpose was Syria, or else he would never have gone to Benghazi.
There were no Libyan factions in Benghazi. only refugees and radicals from other countries.
 

skye

Diamond Member
Joined
Oct 19, 2012
Messages
41,855
Reaction score
26,317
Points
2,635
Who made that call? Biden?

His puppet handlers?

Surely it wasn't him, he is too far gone :cuckoo: ....then again he is so demented that he might have done it himself lol!

I doubt it though.
 

mudwhistle

Diamond Member
Joined
Jul 21, 2009
Messages
100,258
Reaction score
29,326
Points
2,220
Location
Tested Negative For COVID-19
Who made that call? Biden?
I bet there are alot of people in Europe that want to kick Obama & Biden's ass for that decision.
Six million Syrian refugees had already fled before the US got involved. Mehr Assad had dropped thousands of barrel bombs on civilians.

Wrong.
The US was ALWAYS involved and was responsible for STARTING the whole civil war in Syria.
It was Hillary's "Arab Spring" concept to wipe out all the legitimate governments in the Mideast, like Saddam, Qaddafi, Assad, Morsi, etc.
Nope.. Severe drought settled on Syria in 2005. The farmers abandoned their farms and moved to the cities with high unemployment and the oil sector finally collapsed. Mehr Assad is in charge and he's as savage as his father Hayfez was. I am surprised you don't know anything about Syria or its history of sectarian strife and assassinations.
Assad had nothing to do with those problems, and starting a civil war can not possibly help those economic problems.
But the rebels suddenly had expensive weapons and new Toyota trucks.
Who was funding them?
Who was Ambassador Stevens meeting in Benghazi, and what was in the CIA annex warehouse there?
The ambassador had dinner with the Turkish envoy, but he was in town to dedicate the new joint venture in emergency services between Mass General and Benghazi Hospital the next morning.

Assad arrested and tortured the schoolboys .. that's when all hell broke loose all over the Syria.

The annex was a communication operation to identify which tribes might support a return to the Idris constitution.
I don't buy that for a second.
Benghazi was much too dangerous, full of al Qaeda and ISIS.
The only reason Stevens could possibly have for being in Benghazi, so far from protection, would be to meet with Syrian rebels or those who could be recruited to fight somewhere, as the US wanted.
It was an obvious risk and would only have been done for some covert reason.

Nor does the US need a communications operations in Benghazi.
Radio can be done anywhere, or from satellite even.
The CIA annex warehouse could only have been for things like weapons, vehicles, and money.
That should not have been there.

And by the way, there are NO tribes in Benghazi. The coast had all been taken over by dangerous refugee groups.
The tribes in Libya live further south in the hill country.
And Stevens was not at all interested in the tribal leaders, who do not like the US.
Stevens was there to recover some shoulder-fired surface to air missiles Obama sold to rebels and ended up being used against us.
They knew this because one of them was fired at one of our choppers...and the numbskulls forgot to set the fuse...so they got the serial number off of it.
Benghazi was a coverup mission that totally backfired.
This is what happens when your president is a backstabbing treasonous communist.
LOLOL.. Gaddafi had been on a weapons buying spree in Europe and a year later in Russia.. to the tune of 4 billion so the country was awash in weapons. Stevens was NOT there to recover weapons.. He was an ambassador, for Christ's sake.. The Annex was staff with translators, interpreters, computer people to try and identify and communicate with Eastern tribes who might back a reinstatement of the Idris Constitution.

You are dumb as a stump.
The LAST place the US would go in order to connect with Libyans for stability, is Benghazi.
Benghazi had been over run with refugees from Palestine, Egypt, Syria, etc., for decades, and had nothing to do with the Libyan mainstream in Tripoli.

Sure Qaddafi had been buying lots of weapons, but those all ended up getting blown up in the desert when we massacred Qaddafi's forces.

And Libyan weapons were irrelevant to Stevens.
Clearly Steven's purpose was Syria, or else he would never have gone to Benghazi.
There were no Libyan factions in Benghazi. only refugees and radicals from other countries.
The missiles he was trying to retrieve where transferred to the rebels (ISIS) in Syria.
Some of them ended up in other parts of the ME being shot at our own aircraft.

Reminds me of the time they captured KW-7s in Iraq from the Republican Guard that had serial numbers that matched equipment that was supposed to be in Germany. We had to redo the guts on our Crypto in the Army everywhere after that.
 

surada

Platinum Member
Joined
Jan 3, 2021
Messages
8,572
Reaction score
4,436
Points
893
Who made that call? Biden?
I bet there are alot of people in Europe that want to kick Obama & Biden's ass for that decision.
Six million Syrian refugees had already fled before the US got involved. Mehr Assad had dropped thousands of barrel bombs on civilians.

Wrong.
The US was ALWAYS involved and was responsible for STARTING the whole civil war in Syria.
It was Hillary's "Arab Spring" concept to wipe out all the legitimate governments in the Mideast, like Saddam, Qaddafi, Assad, Morsi, etc.
Nope.. Severe drought settled on Syria in 2005. The farmers abandoned their farms and moved to the cities with high unemployment and the oil sector finally collapsed. Mehr Assad is in charge and he's as savage as his father Hayfez was. I am surprised you don't know anything about Syria or its history of sectarian strife and assassinations.
Assad had nothing to do with those problems, and starting a civil war can not possibly help those economic problems.
But the rebels suddenly had expensive weapons and new Toyota trucks.
Who was funding them?
Who was Ambassador Stevens meeting in Benghazi, and what was in the CIA annex warehouse there?
The ambassador had dinner with the Turkish envoy, but he was in town to dedicate the new joint venture in emergency services between Mass General and Benghazi Hospital the next morning.

Assad arrested and tortured the schoolboys .. that's when all hell broke loose all over the Syria.

The annex was a communication operation to identify which tribes might support a return to the Idris constitution.
I don't buy that for a second.
Benghazi was much too dangerous, full of al Qaeda and ISIS.
The only reason Stevens could possibly have for being in Benghazi, so far from protection, would be to meet with Syrian rebels or those who could be recruited to fight somewhere, as the US wanted.
It was an obvious risk and would only have been done for some covert reason.

Nor does the US need a communications operations in Benghazi.
Radio can be done anywhere, or from satellite even.
The CIA annex warehouse could only have been for things like weapons, vehicles, and money.
That should not have been there.

And by the way, there are NO tribes in Benghazi. The coast had all been taken over by dangerous refugee groups.
The tribes in Libya live further south in the hill country.
And Stevens was not at all interested in the tribal leaders, who do not like the US.
Stevens was there to recover some shoulder-fired surface to air missiles Obama sold to rebels and ended up being used against us.
They knew this because one of them was fired at one of our choppers...and the numbskulls forgot to set the fuse...so they got the serial number off of it.
Benghazi was a coverup mission that totally backfired.
This is what happens when your president is a backstabbing treasonous communist.
LOLOL.. Gaddafi had been on a weapons buying spree in Europe and a year later in Russia.. to the tune of 4 billion so the country was awash in weapons. Stevens was NOT there to recover weapons.. He was an ambassador, for Christ's sake.. The Annex was staff with translators, interpreters, computer people to try and identify and communicate with Eastern tribes who might back a reinstatement of the Idris Constitution.

You are dumb as a stump.
The LAST place the US would go in order to connect with Libyans for stability, is Benghazi.
Benghazi had been over run with refugees from Palestine, Egypt, Syria, etc., for decades, and had nothing to do with the Libyan mainstream in Tripoli.

Sure Qaddafi had been buying lots of weapons, but those all ended up getting blown up in the desert when we massacred Qaddafi's forces.

And Libyan weapons were irrelevant to Stevens.
Clearly Steven's purpose was Syria, or else he would never have gone to Benghazi.
There were no Libyan factions in Benghazi. only refugees and radicals from other countries.
Stevens loved Benghazi. The Eastern tribes hated Gaddafi since 1970... and Libya is VERY tribal. What made you think there were no Libyan nationals in Benghazi?

Why do you think there were NO Libyans in Gaddafi's military or police? They were all foreign mercenaries. Even in Tripoli he was hated.

Gaddafi's forces dropped their weapons and fled. Who is the WE that massacred Libyan forces in the desert?

Stevens was in Benghazi overnight to dedicate new emergency services at Benghazi Hospital which was a joint venture with Mass General Hospital.
 

surada

Platinum Member
Joined
Jan 3, 2021
Messages
8,572
Reaction score
4,436
Points
893
Who made that call? Biden?
I bet there are alot of people in Europe that want to kick Obama & Biden's ass for that decision.
Six million Syrian refugees had already fled before the US got involved. Mehr Assad had dropped thousands of barrel bombs on civilians.

Wrong.
The US was ALWAYS involved and was responsible for STARTING the whole civil war in Syria.
It was Hillary's "Arab Spring" concept to wipe out all the legitimate governments in the Mideast, like Saddam, Qaddafi, Assad, Morsi, etc.
Nope.. Severe drought settled on Syria in 2005. The farmers abandoned their farms and moved to the cities with high unemployment and the oil sector finally collapsed. Mehr Assad is in charge and he's as savage as his father Hayfez was. I am surprised you don't know anything about Syria or its history of sectarian strife and assassinations.
Assad had nothing to do with those problems, and starting a civil war can not possibly help those economic problems.
But the rebels suddenly had expensive weapons and new Toyota trucks.
Who was funding them?
Who was Ambassador Stevens meeting in Benghazi, and what was in the CIA annex warehouse there?
The ambassador had dinner with the Turkish envoy, but he was in town to dedicate the new joint venture in emergency services between Mass General and Benghazi Hospital the next morning.

Assad arrested and tortured the schoolboys .. that's when all hell broke loose all over the Syria.

The annex was a communication operation to identify which tribes might support a return to the Idris constitution.
I don't buy that for a second.
Benghazi was much too dangerous, full of al Qaeda and ISIS.
The only reason Stevens could possibly have for being in Benghazi, so far from protection, would be to meet with Syrian rebels or those who could be recruited to fight somewhere, as the US wanted.
It was an obvious risk and would only have been done for some covert reason.

Nor does the US need a communications operations in Benghazi.
Radio can be done anywhere, or from satellite even.
The CIA annex warehouse could only have been for things like weapons, vehicles, and money.
That should not have been there.

And by the way, there are NO tribes in Benghazi. The coast had all been taken over by dangerous refugee groups.
The tribes in Libya live further south in the hill country.
And Stevens was not at all interested in the tribal leaders, who do not like the US.
Stevens was there to recover some shoulder-fired surface to air missiles Obama sold to rebels and ended up being used against us.
They knew this because one of them was fired at one of our choppers...and the numbskulls forgot to set the fuse...so they got the serial number off of it.
Benghazi was a coverup mission that totally backfired.
This is what happens when your president is a backstabbing treasonous communist.
LOLOL.. Gaddafi had been on a weapons buying spree in Europe and a year later in Russia.. to the tune of 4 billion so the country was awash in weapons. Stevens was NOT there to recover weapons.. He was an ambassador, for Christ's sake.. The Annex was staff with translators, interpreters, computer people to try and identify and communicate with Eastern tribes who might back a reinstatement of the Idris Constitution.

You are dumb as a stump.
The LAST place the US would go in order to connect with Libyans for stability, is Benghazi.
Benghazi had been over run with refugees from Palestine, Egypt, Syria, etc., for decades, and had nothing to do with the Libyan mainstream in Tripoli.

Sure Qaddafi had been buying lots of weapons, but those all ended up getting blown up in the desert when we massacred Qaddafi's forces.

And Libyan weapons were irrelevant to Stevens.
Clearly Steven's purpose was Syria, or else he would never have gone to Benghazi.
There were no Libyan factions in Benghazi. only refugees and radicals from other countries.
The missiles he was trying to retrieve where transferred to the rebels (ISIS) in Syria.
Some of them ended up in other parts of the ME being shot at our own aircraft.

Reminds me of the time they captured KW-7s in Iraq from the Republican Guard that had serial numbers that matched equipment that was supposed to be in Germany. We had to redo the guts on our Crypto in the Army everywhere after that.
Nope.. The FSA was also fighting ISIS.
 

mudwhistle

Diamond Member
Joined
Jul 21, 2009
Messages
100,258
Reaction score
29,326
Points
2,220
Location
Tested Negative For COVID-19
Who made that call? Biden?
I bet there are alot of people in Europe that want to kick Obama & Biden's ass for that decision.
Six million Syrian refugees had already fled before the US got involved. Mehr Assad had dropped thousands of barrel bombs on civilians.

Wrong.
The US was ALWAYS involved and was responsible for STARTING the whole civil war in Syria.
It was Hillary's "Arab Spring" concept to wipe out all the legitimate governments in the Mideast, like Saddam, Qaddafi, Assad, Morsi, etc.
Nope.. Severe drought settled on Syria in 2005. The farmers abandoned their farms and moved to the cities with high unemployment and the oil sector finally collapsed. Mehr Assad is in charge and he's as savage as his father Hayfez was. I am surprised you don't know anything about Syria or its history of sectarian strife and assassinations.
Assad had nothing to do with those problems, and starting a civil war can not possibly help those economic problems.
But the rebels suddenly had expensive weapons and new Toyota trucks.
Who was funding them?
Who was Ambassador Stevens meeting in Benghazi, and what was in the CIA annex warehouse there?
The ambassador had dinner with the Turkish envoy, but he was in town to dedicate the new joint venture in emergency services between Mass General and Benghazi Hospital the next morning.

Assad arrested and tortured the schoolboys .. that's when all hell broke loose all over the Syria.

The annex was a communication operation to identify which tribes might support a return to the Idris constitution.
I don't buy that for a second.
Benghazi was much too dangerous, full of al Qaeda and ISIS.
The only reason Stevens could possibly have for being in Benghazi, so far from protection, would be to meet with Syrian rebels or those who could be recruited to fight somewhere, as the US wanted.
It was an obvious risk and would only have been done for some covert reason.

Nor does the US need a communications operations in Benghazi.
Radio can be done anywhere, or from satellite even.
The CIA annex warehouse could only have been for things like weapons, vehicles, and money.
That should not have been there.

And by the way, there are NO tribes in Benghazi. The coast had all been taken over by dangerous refugee groups.
The tribes in Libya live further south in the hill country.
And Stevens was not at all interested in the tribal leaders, who do not like the US.
Stevens was there to recover some shoulder-fired surface to air missiles Obama sold to rebels and ended up being used against us.
They knew this because one of them was fired at one of our choppers...and the numbskulls forgot to set the fuse...so they got the serial number off of it.
Benghazi was a coverup mission that totally backfired.
This is what happens when your president is a backstabbing treasonous communist.
LOLOL.. Gaddafi had been on a weapons buying spree in Europe and a year later in Russia.. to the tune of 4 billion so the country was awash in weapons. Stevens was NOT there to recover weapons.. He was an ambassador, for Christ's sake.. The Annex was staff with translators, interpreters, computer people to try and identify and communicate with Eastern tribes who might back a reinstatement of the Idris Constitution.

You are dumb as a stump.
The LAST place the US would go in order to connect with Libyans for stability, is Benghazi.
Benghazi had been over run with refugees from Palestine, Egypt, Syria, etc., for decades, and had nothing to do with the Libyan mainstream in Tripoli.

Sure Qaddafi had been buying lots of weapons, but those all ended up getting blown up in the desert when we massacred Qaddafi's forces.

And Libyan weapons were irrelevant to Stevens.
Clearly Steven's purpose was Syria, or else he would never have gone to Benghazi.
There were no Libyan factions in Benghazi. only refugees and radicals from other countries.
The missiles he was trying to retrieve where transferred to the rebels (ISIS) in Syria.
Some of them ended up in other parts of the ME being shot at our own aircraft.

Reminds me of the time they captured KW-7s in Iraq from the Republican Guard that had serial numbers that matched equipment that was supposed to be in Germany. We had to redo the guts on our Crypto in the Army everywhere after that.
Nope.. The FSA was also fighting ISIS.
One thing I discovered working with Muslims in the UN.....they're all two-faced back-stabbers.
If it means getting rid of infidels they'll sell out their Grandmother.
 
OP
ColonelAngus

ColonelAngus

Diamond Member
Joined
Feb 25, 2015
Messages
31,336
Reaction score
19,982
Points
1,915
Who made that call? Biden?
I bet there are alot of people in Europe that want to kick Obama & Biden's ass for that decision.
Six million Syrian refugees had already fled before the US got involved. Mehr Assad had dropped thousands of barrel bombs on civilians.

Wrong.
The US was ALWAYS involved and was responsible for STARTING the whole civil war in Syria.
It was Hillary's "Arab Spring" concept to wipe out all the legitimate governments in the Mideast, like Saddam, Qaddafi, Assad, Morsi, etc.
Nope.. Severe drought settled on Syria in 2005. The farmers abandoned their farms and moved to the cities with high unemployment and the oil sector finally collapsed. Mehr Assad is in charge and he's as savage as his father Hayfez was. I am surprised you don't know anything about Syria or its history of sectarian strife and assassinations.
Assad had nothing to do with those problems, and starting a civil war can not possibly help those economic problems.
But the rebels suddenly had expensive weapons and new Toyota trucks.
Who was funding them?
Who was Ambassador Stevens meeting in Benghazi, and what was in the CIA annex warehouse there?
The ambassador had dinner with the Turkish envoy, but he was in town to dedicate the new joint venture in emergency services between Mass General and Benghazi Hospital the next morning.

Assad arrested and tortured the schoolboys .. that's when all hell broke loose all over the Syria.

The annex was a communication operation to identify which tribes might support a return to the Idris constitution.
I don't buy that for a second.
Benghazi was much too dangerous, full of al Qaeda and ISIS.
The only reason Stevens could possibly have for being in Benghazi, so far from protection, would be to meet with Syrian rebels or those who could be recruited to fight somewhere, as the US wanted.
It was an obvious risk and would only have been done for some covert reason.

Nor does the US need a communications operations in Benghazi.
Radio can be done anywhere, or from satellite even.
The CIA annex warehouse could only have been for things like weapons, vehicles, and money.
That should not have been there.

And by the way, there are NO tribes in Benghazi. The coast had all been taken over by dangerous refugee groups.
The tribes in Libya live further south in the hill country.
And Stevens was not at all interested in the tribal leaders, who do not like the US.
Stevens was there to recover some shoulder-fired surface to air missiles Obama sold to rebels and ended up being used against us.
They knew this because one of them was fired at one of our choppers...and the numbskulls forgot to set the fuse...so they got the serial number off of it.
Benghazi was a coverup mission that totally backfired.
This is what happens when your president is a backstabbing treasonous communist.
LOLOL.. Gaddafi had been on a weapons buying spree in Europe and a year later in Russia.. to the tune of 4 billion so the country was awash in weapons. Stevens was NOT there to recover weapons.. He was an ambassador, for Christ's sake.. The Annex was staff with translators, interpreters, computer people to try and identify and communicate with Eastern tribes who might back a reinstatement of the Idris Constitution.

You are dumb as a stump.
The LAST place the US would go in order to connect with Libyans for stability, is Benghazi.
Benghazi had been over run with refugees from Palestine, Egypt, Syria, etc., for decades, and had nothing to do with the Libyan mainstream in Tripoli.

Sure Qaddafi had been buying lots of weapons, but those all ended up getting blown up in the desert when we massacred Qaddafi's forces.

And Libyan weapons were irrelevant to Stevens.
Clearly Steven's purpose was Syria, or else he would never have gone to Benghazi.
There were no Libyan factions in Benghazi. only refugees and radicals from other countries.
The missiles he was trying to retrieve where transferred to the rebels (ISIS) in Syria.
Some of them ended up in other parts of the ME being shot at our own aircraft.

Reminds me of the time they captured KW-7s in Iraq from the Republican Guard that had serial numbers that matched equipment that was supposed to be in Germany. We had to redo the guts on our Crypto in the Army everywhere after that.
Nope.. The FSA was also fighting ISIS.
One thing I discovered working with Muslims in the UN.....they're all two-faced back-stabbers.
If it means getting rid of infidels they'll sell out their Grandmother.
Its in their religion. Literally. In the Quran. Its ok to fuck over someone to get ahead as as they are not muslim.

Liberals refuse to call out muslim homophobia and misogyny because liberal Nazis really do not care about those things. They are just political tools.

The liberals are truly dirty fuking Nazis.
 

surada

Platinum Member
Joined
Jan 3, 2021
Messages
8,572
Reaction score
4,436
Points
893
Who made that call? Biden?
I bet there are alot of people in Europe that want to kick Obama & Biden's ass for that decision.
Six million Syrian refugees had already fled before the US got involved. Mehr Assad had dropped thousands of barrel bombs on civilians.

Wrong.
The US was ALWAYS involved and was responsible for STARTING the whole civil war in Syria.
It was Hillary's "Arab Spring" concept to wipe out all the legitimate governments in the Mideast, like Saddam, Qaddafi, Assad, Morsi, etc.
Nope.. Severe drought settled on Syria in 2005. The farmers abandoned their farms and moved to the cities with high unemployment and the oil sector finally collapsed. Mehr Assad is in charge and he's as savage as his father Hayfez was. I am surprised you don't know anything about Syria or its history of sectarian strife and assassinations.
Assad had nothing to do with those problems, and starting a civil war can not possibly help those economic problems.
But the rebels suddenly had expensive weapons and new Toyota trucks.
Who was funding them?
Who was Ambassador Stevens meeting in Benghazi, and what was in the CIA annex warehouse there?
The ambassador had dinner with the Turkish envoy, but he was in town to dedicate the new joint venture in emergency services between Mass General and Benghazi Hospital the next morning.

Assad arrested and tortured the schoolboys .. that's when all hell broke loose all over the Syria.

The annex was a communication operation to identify which tribes might support a return to the Idris constitution.
I don't buy that for a second.
Benghazi was much too dangerous, full of al Qaeda and ISIS.
The only reason Stevens could possibly have for being in Benghazi, so far from protection, would be to meet with Syrian rebels or those who could be recruited to fight somewhere, as the US wanted.
It was an obvious risk and would only have been done for some covert reason.

Nor does the US need a communications operations in Benghazi.
Radio can be done anywhere, or from satellite even.
The CIA annex warehouse could only have been for things like weapons, vehicles, and money.
That should not have been there.

And by the way, there are NO tribes in Benghazi. The coast had all been taken over by dangerous refugee groups.
The tribes in Libya live further south in the hill country.
And Stevens was not at all interested in the tribal leaders, who do not like the US.
Stevens was there to recover some shoulder-fired surface to air missiles Obama sold to rebels and ended up being used against us.
They knew this because one of them was fired at one of our choppers...and the numbskulls forgot to set the fuse...so they got the serial number off of it.
Benghazi was a coverup mission that totally backfired.
This is what happens when your president is a backstabbing treasonous communist.
LOLOL.. Gaddafi had been on a weapons buying spree in Europe and a year later in Russia.. to the tune of 4 billion so the country was awash in weapons. Stevens was NOT there to recover weapons.. He was an ambassador, for Christ's sake.. The Annex was staff with translators, interpreters, computer people to try and identify and communicate with Eastern tribes who might back a reinstatement of the Idris Constitution.

You are dumb as a stump.
The LAST place the US would go in order to connect with Libyans for stability, is Benghazi.
Benghazi had been over run with refugees from Palestine, Egypt, Syria, etc., for decades, and had nothing to do with the Libyan mainstream in Tripoli.

Sure Qaddafi had been buying lots of weapons, but those all ended up getting blown up in the desert when we massacred Qaddafi's forces.

And Libyan weapons were irrelevant to Stevens.
Clearly Steven's purpose was Syria, or else he would never have gone to Benghazi.
There were no Libyan factions in Benghazi. only refugees and radicals from other countries.
The missiles he was trying to retrieve where transferred to the rebels (ISIS) in Syria.
Some of them ended up in other parts of the ME being shot at our own aircraft.

Reminds me of the time they captured KW-7s in Iraq from the Republican Guard that had serial numbers that matched equipment that was supposed to be in Germany. We had to redo the guts on our Crypto in the Army everywhere after that.
Nope.. The FSA was also fighting ISIS.
One thing I discovered working with Muslims in the UN.....they're all two-faced back-stabbers.
If it means getting rid of infidels they'll sell out their Grandmother.
Its in their religion. Literally. In the Quran. Its ok to fuck over someone to get ahead as as they are not muslim.

Liberals refuse to call out muslim homophobia and misogyny because liberal Nazis really do not care about those things. They are just political tools.

The liberals are truly dirty fuking Nazis.
You are so stupid. You have never read the Koran and you don't know any Muslims.
 
OP
ColonelAngus

ColonelAngus

Diamond Member
Joined
Feb 25, 2015
Messages
31,336
Reaction score
19,982
Points
1,915
Who made that call? Biden?
I bet there are alot of people in Europe that want to kick Obama & Biden's ass for that decision.
Six million Syrian refugees had already fled before the US got involved. Mehr Assad had dropped thousands of barrel bombs on civilians.

Wrong.
The US was ALWAYS involved and was responsible for STARTING the whole civil war in Syria.
It was Hillary's "Arab Spring" concept to wipe out all the legitimate governments in the Mideast, like Saddam, Qaddafi, Assad, Morsi, etc.
Nope.. Severe drought settled on Syria in 2005. The farmers abandoned their farms and moved to the cities with high unemployment and the oil sector finally collapsed. Mehr Assad is in charge and he's as savage as his father Hayfez was. I am surprised you don't know anything about Syria or its history of sectarian strife and assassinations.
Assad had nothing to do with those problems, and starting a civil war can not possibly help those economic problems.
But the rebels suddenly had expensive weapons and new Toyota trucks.
Who was funding them?
Who was Ambassador Stevens meeting in Benghazi, and what was in the CIA annex warehouse there?
The ambassador had dinner with the Turkish envoy, but he was in town to dedicate the new joint venture in emergency services between Mass General and Benghazi Hospital the next morning.

Assad arrested and tortured the schoolboys .. that's when all hell broke loose all over the Syria.

The annex was a communication operation to identify which tribes might support a return to the Idris constitution.
I don't buy that for a second.
Benghazi was much too dangerous, full of al Qaeda and ISIS.
The only reason Stevens could possibly have for being in Benghazi, so far from protection, would be to meet with Syrian rebels or those who could be recruited to fight somewhere, as the US wanted.
It was an obvious risk and would only have been done for some covert reason.

Nor does the US need a communications operations in Benghazi.
Radio can be done anywhere, or from satellite even.
The CIA annex warehouse could only have been for things like weapons, vehicles, and money.
That should not have been there.

And by the way, there are NO tribes in Benghazi. The coast had all been taken over by dangerous refugee groups.
The tribes in Libya live further south in the hill country.
And Stevens was not at all interested in the tribal leaders, who do not like the US.
Stevens was there to recover some shoulder-fired surface to air missiles Obama sold to rebels and ended up being used against us.
They knew this because one of them was fired at one of our choppers...and the numbskulls forgot to set the fuse...so they got the serial number off of it.
Benghazi was a coverup mission that totally backfired.
This is what happens when your president is a backstabbing treasonous communist.
LOLOL.. Gaddafi had been on a weapons buying spree in Europe and a year later in Russia.. to the tune of 4 billion so the country was awash in weapons. Stevens was NOT there to recover weapons.. He was an ambassador, for Christ's sake.. The Annex was staff with translators, interpreters, computer people to try and identify and communicate with Eastern tribes who might back a reinstatement of the Idris Constitution.

You are dumb as a stump.
The LAST place the US would go in order to connect with Libyans for stability, is Benghazi.
Benghazi had been over run with refugees from Palestine, Egypt, Syria, etc., for decades, and had nothing to do with the Libyan mainstream in Tripoli.

Sure Qaddafi had been buying lots of weapons, but those all ended up getting blown up in the desert when we massacred Qaddafi's forces.

And Libyan weapons were irrelevant to Stevens.
Clearly Steven's purpose was Syria, or else he would never have gone to Benghazi.
There were no Libyan factions in Benghazi. only refugees and radicals from other countries.
The missiles he was trying to retrieve where transferred to the rebels (ISIS) in Syria.
Some of them ended up in other parts of the ME being shot at our own aircraft.

Reminds me of the time they captured KW-7s in Iraq from the Republican Guard that had serial numbers that matched equipment that was supposed to be in Germany. We had to redo the guts on our Crypto in the Army everywhere after that.
Nope.. The FSA was also fighting ISIS.
One thing I discovered working with Muslims in the UN.....they're all two-faced back-stabbers.
If it means getting rid of infidels they'll sell out their Grandmother.
Its in their religion. Literally. In the Quran. Its ok to fuck over someone to get ahead as as they are not muslim.

Liberals refuse to call out muslim homophobia and misogyny because liberal Nazis really do not care about those things. They are just political tools.

The liberals are truly dirty fuking Nazis.
You are so stupid. You have never read the Koran and you don't know any Muslims.
Its the Quran, you ignorant fuck and I know plenty of muslims, you Nazi sack of shit.

Educate yourself, you dumb fucking commie.

 
OP
ColonelAngus

ColonelAngus

Diamond Member
Joined
Feb 25, 2015
Messages
31,336
Reaction score
19,982
Points
1,915
Crank up that war machine!

You imperialist liberal Nazis voted to kill brown people....and you are going to get it.

Biden and Obama started 5 illegal wars and killed over 500,000 brown people.

You liberals are truly Nazis.
 

Most reactions - Past 7 days

Forum List

Top