Who is right, trump or the two policemen?

It will be congress and the courts that stop this nonsense.
Its a fund for people wrongfully prosecuted and persecuted by federal or state governments... this is something dems have promissed to pass for 40 years or more... what happened???
 
I have to ask, do you really believe that poor, deluded, young woman is a hero for participating in a violent riot against her country?
The woman was a US veteran who was seen on film resisting vioolent protesters when she was shot by the cop from behind other officers and in no danger.
 
Back and Kon are arguing nonsense.

The cops were not murdered by the mob.
Perhaps the most remarkable aspect of the riot is the Capital police not opening fire on the mob when they would have completely been within their rights to do so.
 
The woman was a US veteran who was seen on film resisting vioolent protesters when she was shot by the cop from behind other officers and in no danger.
She was shot while in the process of trying to breach the barricade blocking access by the violent mob to congressmen hiding in the House chambers. The officer who shot her was correctly cleared of any wrongdoing.
 
Its a fund for people wrongfully prosecuted and persecuted by federal or state governments... this is something dems have promissed to pass for 40 years or more... what happened???
But there are no such people, particularly not for traitors, to have such compensation.
 
It’s never been adjudicated, so you’re talking out your ass.
No no, you jerkoff. I was pointing out that you make claims which you have absolutely no ability to establish.

Try to follow along, Konnie.
 
Democrats are still angry that the racist black cop who murdered the unarmed American hero woman on J-6 was not awarded the Black Caucus Congressional Medal of Honor.
He was a hero, doing his duty.and had no way of knowing whether the thugs breaking in were armed. Play stupid game; win stupid prizes.
 
Perhaps the most remarkable aspect of the riot is the Capital police not opening fire on the mob when they would have completely been within their rights to do so.
Just like the officer under attack was completely within his rights and responsibility to shoot Micheal Brown down like a rabid dog.
 
Turnabout is fair play. Explain when it was adjudicated.
Try for clarity, you simpleton.

When was “what” adjudicated? Be specific.

You bloviated about “homicide.” You, being the truly simplistic dolt you always are, focused solely on the time between some acts and the time of someone’s passing.

What you have never addressed is your implicit (but unspoken) assumption that a cop’s death the next day is (somehow) attributable to any conduct by any of J6 protestors/rioters.

You remain completely unable to demonstrate any correlation. You cannot validly show any causation. And without that, “homicide” is not a valid contention.
 
Last edited:
Trump politized the Justice Department and hundreds had just and legal charges against them thrown out by pardon.
No, you can charge people illegally and then think they aren't going to be pardoned or compensated. It's called life. In the end, you guys always lose.
 
Nope.

Ashli Babbitt’s family reached a settlement in May 2025 with the federal government for nearly $5 million to resolve a wrongful death lawsuit, rather than winning a trial verdict.

IOW, trump decided to give them $5M after their daughter, who was influenced by the QAnon cult, tried to break through a barricade protecting congressmen from trump's violent mob.
DOJ settled in court because they knew were going to lose. The judge accepted the settlement. That's adjudicated. Also, hundreds of others had their most serious charges tossed by scotus because Biden and Garland were corrupt and persecuted people.

Your cabal was murdering unarmed people (found civilly liable for murder) and locking others up for crimes they didn't commit (hundreds of the most serious charges thrown out by SCOTUS for being illegally and politically motivated). Pardons were obviously coming next to finally close this corrupt charade. Decent people understand that.
 
Try for clarity, you simpleton.

When was “what” adjudicated? Be specific.

You bloviated about “homicide.” You, being the truly simplistic dolt you always are, focused solely on the time between some acts and the time of someone’s passing.

What you have never addressed is your implicit (but unspoken) assumption that a cop’s death the next day is (somehow) attributable to any conduct by any of J6 protestors/rioters.

You remain completely unable to demonstrate any correlation. You cannot validly show any causation. And without that, “homicide” is not a valid contention.
The officer's death is certainly indirectly, at least, tied to the stress and trauma of the previous day's events.
 
Try for clarity, you simpleton.

When was “what” adjudicated? Be specific.

You bloviated about “homicide.” You, being the truly simplistic dolt you always are, focused solely on the time between some acts and the time of someone’s passing.

What you have never addressed is your implicit (but unspoken) assumption that a cop’s death the next day is (somehow) attributable to any conduct by any of J6 protestors/rioters.

You remain completely unable to demonstrate any correlation. You cannot validly show any causation. And without that, “homicide” is not a valid contention.
You need to be specific. I’m asking the questions here.
 
15th post

New Topics

Back
Top Bottom