Roudy -
Great. I am glad you went and checked.
As you can see - the major group of casualities were Australian - not British. Bali is a huge destination for Australian and NZ tourists - much less so for Brits who more often go to Spain, Thailand, Turkey etc.
And the death toll was 200, not 250.
Brits suffered 24 deaths, third highest, while Americans had 7, and NZ had 3. . Now who's "factually incorrect"? And that doesn't include all those that have suffered lifelong injuries. Bali is a regular vacation spot for British, and the bombers knew that. This is what you do, you divert the conversation from the big picture with your BS spell check and "numbers", as a lame attempt to justify Muslims walking into a nightclub and massacring over two hundred 20 and 30 year olds.
Really, Roudy - why do you do this to yourself?
You know absolutely 0 about Indonesia, and even less about the bombings.
The targets of the bombing were Australians and Americans, and there are simple, clear stated reasons for that, which I'd be happy to explain if you are genuinely interested. I doubt the terrorists were terribly concerned about this and would not have been fans of the UK either, but I think it is important to understand that the group responsible (IJ) themselves suggested Australians and Americans were the main targets. Few Americans travel to Bali, so they wouldn't have been an easy target for any group who did not know Kuta-Lgian very well.
The reason, and the only reason British people were killed in the bombing was because an Irish bar was badly damaged by the bomb, and there were a lot of Brits in there.
Bali is not a major destination for British people, and they were not a specific target. Unofrtunately for the Brits, the terrorists knew about as much about Kuta as you do.