YoursTruly
Platinum Member
- Dec 21, 2019
- 10,437
- 6,412
- 940
- Thread starter
- #281
I would. Based on the current laws there was no reason to deny him his 2nd amendment rights
LMAO... "Based on the current laws" means you trust the government and their laws, which has failed to keep children and other citizens safe. You have faith in something that's obviously failed.
The law allowed a psychopath to get a gun and kill children. I started a poll on this, on another thread, and so do most of the other radical right wingers.
Lives are first. 2A comes after.
This whole thread reeks of "You can kill my children, but you can't take my guns."