You don't refute anything.ChrisL, et al,
There is no single right answer to this. It is a summation of a number of different factors that alter the attraction to terrorism and criminal political behaviors.
(OBSERVATIONs)
Resolution adopted by the General Assembly: Resolution A/RES/2/110 (II) (1947). Measures to be taken against propaganda and the inciters of a new war:
1.Resolution adopted by the General Assembly: Resolution A/RES/60/288 (2006). The United Nations Global Counter-Terrorism StrategyCondemns all forms of propaganda, in whatsoever country conducted, which is either designed or likely to provoke or encourage and threat to the peace, breach of the peace, or act of aggression;
2.Requests the Government of each Member to take appropriate steps within its constitutional limits:
- To promote, by all means of publicity and propaganda available to them, friendly relations among nations based upon the Purposes and Principles of the Charter;
- To encourage the dissemination of all information designed to give expression to the undoubted desire of all peoples for peace;
I. Measures to address the conditions conducive to the spread of terrorism
4. To continue to work to adopt such measures as may be necessary and appropriate and in accordance with our respective obligations under international law to prohibit by law incitement to commit a terrorist act or acts and prevent such conduct;
(COMMENT)
The single most recurring observation you can make along these lines is the "glorification" of the criminal act themselves. This is done on three levels: the Religious Level (as Martyrs' -- 70 Virgins as compensation), and the Political Recognition Level (Public Acknowledgement of the Heroic act); and the phenomenon of violent crime motivated by a craving for notoriety or self-glorification.
The message to incite young people to rally is essentially the same, whether it barbaric and deviant nature of the Islamic State of Iraq and Syria (ISIS), or indeed the Islamic Resistance Movement (HAMAS) --- the objective is to replenish the terrorist group so it can continue spreading destruction and devastation.
Example:
“Izzat Risheq, a senior Hamas official, praised the stabbing attack.
Speaking from Qatar, he described it as “a natural response to the crimes of the occupation and terrorism against the Palestinian people”.”
Risheq was not the only Hamas official to condone the attack:
“The event was deemed a “natural response to Israeli terrorism,” by Hamas Spokesperson Sami Abu Zuhri, who issued an official statement as events unfolded in Tel Aviv.
The incident, the statement said, was a response to ongoing “Israeli crimes” against the Palestinian people. “
End of Example
It is the nature of the environment and generation of being told --- Jihad is the solution.
Most Respectfully,
RExample:
“Izzat Risheq, a senior Hamas official, praised the stabbing attack.
Speaking from Qatar, he described it as “a natural response to the crimes of the occupation and terrorism against the Palestinian people”.”
Risheq was not the only Hamas official to condone the attack:
“The event was deemed a “natural response to Israeli terrorism,” by Hamas Spokesperson Sami Abu Zuhri, who issued an official statement as events unfolded in Tel Aviv.
The incident, the statement said, was a response to ongoing “Israeli crimes” against the Palestinian people. “
End of Example
What part of this is not true?
If you need to ask then you have been brainwashed
Understandable.
Try again...............................
Those are their contributions to the world.
