RE: Who Are The Palestinians? Part 2
⁜→ P F Tinmore, et al,
In broad strokes, I have nothing against "liberation" or "independence as a peoples destiny." However, that is within the parameters that the Arab Palestinians do not represent a clear danger to regional security and a present danger to the State of Israel; that being the limit to a danger to the international community, regional security and the general Arab Population itself.
"Jihad and the armed resistance is the right and real method for the liberation of Palestine, and the restoration of all the rights, together with, of course, all forms of political and diplomatic struggle including in the media, public and legal [spheres]; with the need to mobilize all the energies of the nation in the battle.".......................... Khaled Meshal, former Political Director, HAMAS, 2012
What do you have against liberation?
(COMMENT)
Freedom and liberty are the default conditions for most people and societies. This has been the case for millennia. But that is not to say there are exceptions made for society itself → when it is found to be necessary to implement psychiatric institutionalization for those members of society that represent a danger to themselves or a threat to those that they may come in contact within the general population and citizenry.
Similarly, when an individual nation → or the international community → finds itself
(Israel) threatened by an entire population, or generations within the population,
(in this case the Arab Palestinians) it may be necessary to implement customized and tailored security measures and precautions that prevent the threat from becoming reality and spreading further. And in doing so, those that are in the greater proximity or direct threat must consider the protocols by with the implementation is managed or administered:
◈ The general policy and legal frameworks regulating the extent of the quarentine or sanctions
("the principle that the well-being and development of such peoples form a sacred trust of civilisation");
◈ The responsibility and paternalism in the controlled relationships:
✦ The State of Israel as the primary quartine implementer;
✦ The International Community in the furtherence of International Security;
✦ The Donor Community in the care and human development of the Arab Palestinians
◈ The various levels of responsibility
(Israel, International, Donor) that must constantly evaluate the adaptive behavior to institutionalized care and human development of the threat population
(Arab Palestinians).
Seldom are the psychiatric institutionalization the same from one threat population to another
(North Korea does not present the same threat like Iran, or as the Islamic State). Each must be dealt with on an individual level with diplomacy and political-military intervention. Thus the Arab Palestinians being → yet different again → from the other examples → must have customized approach to the issues
(no one shoe fits all → although they all wear shoes, and no national personality set is the same).
The Arab Palestinians have not demonstrated, the ability "to stand by themselves under the strenuous conditions of the modern world." The Arab Palestinians have, each and every time it has been invited to join in the development of self-governing institutions, rejected the invitation; just as they have often found ways to make the overture of peace negotiations counterproductive.
∑ There is nothing wrong with the idea of "liberation" given that it does not undermine the independence and sovereignty of the only independent Jewish nation (Israel) in the world, which actually worked to attain its self-governing institutions.
Most Respectfully,
R
