Who Are The Palestinians? Part 2

Status
Not open for further replies.
The various Pally Islamic terrorist franchises were taken to task by Arab nations for being supporters of Iran and the Houthi militia.

Those suitcases full of cash from Qatar may be in jeopardy if the Pals continue their Shia ways.





Hamas, Palestinian Islamic Jihad (PIJ) and the Popular Front for the Liberation of Palestine (PFLP) condemned over the weekend the Saudi-led coalition airstrikes in Yemen, drawing sharp criticism from Arabs in the Gulf.


Several writers and political analysts from Saudi Arabia, the United Arab Emirates and Bahrain responded by launching a scathing attack on the Palestinian groups in particular and the Palestinians in general for allegedly supporting the Iranian-backed Houthi militia in Yemen, which has launched drone and missile attacks on Saudi Arabia and the UAE.
 
''Don't fund terrorist fronts''

Seems simple enough. Words and actions need to be coupled in order to squash Islamic terrorism.





Follow the Netherlands's example: Donā€™t fund terrorist fronts​

by David May
| January 22, 2022


The bomb that ended Israeli teenager Rina Shnerbā€™s life in August 2019 also ended Dutch support for the nongovernmental organization that employed her killers. It just took about two years to happen.

Last Wednesday, the Dutch Cabinet upheld its decision to cut funding to the Union of Agricultural Work Committees, a Palestinian nonprofit group whose stated goal is to help local farmers. Faced with incontrovertible evidence, the Dutch couldnā€™t deny that the UAWC simply had too many employees who moonlight for the Popular Front for the Liberation of Palestine or vice versa.
 
Among the many disasters of the Biden politburo is the projected weakness and ineptitude in dealing with the Pal terrorists. From looking to throw taxpayer money at the Pal terrorists via ''aid'' to effectively ignoring the Taylor Force Act, Biden has largely emboldened the Pal suicide cults.



Conducting a remarkable pirouette in American foreign policy, President Joe Biden came into office and completely reversed the previous Administrationā€™s Middle East policy.

Donald Trump had sidelined the confrontation between Israel and the Palestinians, prioritizing above all the U.S.-Israeli strategic partnership. He withdrew from the Iran Deal and slapped Tehran with a maximum pressure strategy that took the regime to near bankruptcy, while prompting an unprecedented normalization of Israeli-Arab relations.
 
An invented people with an invented national identity would seemingly invent a ''blockade''.



The lie of the ā€œGaza blockadeā€​

Maurice Hirsch, Adv. | Jan 23, 2022
The UN, the Palestinian Authority and others are apparently devoted disciples of Mark Twain, who reputedly once quipped: ā€œNever let the truth get in the way of a good story.ā€

In a literally unending list of publications, the United Nations insists on referring to the ostensible Israeli ā€œblockade on Gaza.ā€ Relying on these UN statements, others then further embellish the fallacy by claiming ā€œGaza is the biggest prison in the world.ā€ Both descriptions are used as a means to attack Israel and depict the Gazans as trapped victims of Israeli policies.

The UN rhetoric is then mimicked by the Palestinian Authority leadership. For example, when addressing the Ad-Hoc Liaison Committee to ask the international community for donations, PA Prime Minister Muhammad Shtayyeh spoke about the need to end the ā€œharsh siege on Gaza.ā€






Oh, dear. To be so besieged.

 
The Iranian Mullocrats must have ordered their minions in Gaza to earn their welfare money by taking to the streets and chanting the familiar ''Great Satan'' slogan.

No indication that the ''Great Satan'' has anything to do with Houthis in Yemen but then, it's obligatory for the Mullocrats to launch into the fist-pumping ''Death to Amrica'' chant.



Chants of ā€œDeath to the Saud Clan!ā€ and ā€œAmerica Is the Great Satan!ā€ During Gaza Rally in Support of the Houthis in Yemen​


 
RE: Who Are The Palestinians? Part 2
SUBTOPIC: The Value and Credibility of the UN
ā€»ā†’. Hollie, et al,


Each Representative to the UN should assist in the Maintenance and Integrity of the organization - such that the global population holds a positive impression of competence in the body and its subordinate organizations. This is not happening.

WATCH how Israelā€™s Ambassador to the UN
(COMMENT)

Whether it is the Special Rapporteur of the Commission on Human Rights, the Director of Operations for the United Nations Reliefs and Works Agency for Palestinian Refugees (UNRWA), or the individual ambassadors to the UN proper, the global community is losing faith in the honesty and integrity of the organization as a whole.

Even the International Criminal Court (ICC) has unveiled its character by acting as a de facto legal counsel for the organization that has entities like HAMAS (the Islamic Resistance Movement) (or the Palestinian Islamic Jihad) as a terrorist organization. The UN project the image that the Israelis are completely in the wrong. On the one hand, the UN advocates for peaceful solutions to disputes, while on the other hand defends the armed struggle by any means taken up by the terrorists.

The Global Community is at a crossroads for organizational policy.
1611604183365.png

Most Respectfully,
R
 
On the one hand, the UN advocates for peaceful solutions to disputes, while on the other hand defends the armed struggle by any means taken up by the terrorists.
One one hand Israel gives the UN the finger at any peaceful solution.

On the other hand, armed struggle against oppression is legal.
 
The UN, the Palestinian Authority and others are apparently devoted disciples of Mark Twain, who reputedly once quipped: ā€œNever let the truth get in the way of a good story.ā€

In a literally unending list of publications, the United Nations insists on referring to the ostensible Israeli ā€œblockade on Gaza.ā€ Relying on these UN statements, others then further embellish the fallacy by claiming ā€œGaza is the biggest prison in the world.ā€ Both descriptions are used as a means to attack Israel and depict the Gazans as trapped victims of Israeli policies.

The UN rhetoric is then mimicked by the Palestinian Authority leadership. For example, when addressing the Ad-Hoc Liaison Committee to ask the international community for donations, PA Prime Minister Muhammad Shtayyeh spoke about the need to end the ā€œharsh siege on Gaza.ā€

What makes Twainā€™s comment so relevant is the fact that statistics published by none other than the UN itself disprove their own claim.

-------
The movement of people to and from Gaza via the Rafah and Erez crossings is separate from the movement of goods and fuels which enter and exit Gaza from Egypt through the Rafah and Salah Al-Din crossings and to and from Israel via the Kerem Shalom crossing.

Critics may argue that while there are hundreds of thousands of entries and exits to and from Gaza, the number of people moving is far less than the number of people requesting permits and thus Israelā€™s policies still constitute a ā€œblockade on Gazaā€.

Criticism of this nature is as empty as the claim itself.

Firstly, Israel is not responsible for the policies of Egypt.

Secondly, there is no legal or moral requirement that Israel be singled out as the only country in the world that is required to have open borders. Israel, similar to every other country in the world, is entitled to decide who, how many, when, and under what conditions, foreigners are allowed to enter its territory. Gaza is governed by an internationally designated homicidal terrorist organization that as recently as May 2021 fired 4,500 rockets at Israel, indiscriminately targeting Israelā€™s civilian population. Declaring an Israeli ā€œblockade of Gazaā€ simply because Israel does not agree that an unlimited amount of Gazans - and among them numerous possible terrorists who enter with the purpose of harming Israel - be allowed in to Israel is simply ludicrous.

Others may also criticize the Israeli maritime blockade of Gaza. These critics can be answered by referring them to the pertinent comments of the Report of the UN Secretary-Generalā€™s Panel of Inquiry on the 31 May 2010 Flotilla Incident, headed by Sir Geoffrey Palmer, which, before finding that ā€œIsraelā€™s naval blockade was legalā€ noted:

-----
Since the UN itself has certified the legality of the naval blockade of Gaza, and since it appears to have had little impact on the movement into and from Gaza, surely the UN cannot hold that Israel alone is prevented from using legitimate legal tools that all other countries in the world can use.

Accordingly, since figures published by the UN itself negate the claim of the ā€œblockade on Gazaā€, whether it be from the Israeli or the Egyptian side, the question must be asked: Why does the UN perpetuate the lie?

The following are the graphs that appear on the website of OCHAoPt:

(full article online)

 
Palestinian Labor Minister Nasri Abu Jaish announced a program to try to fund jobs for Palestinian women, as he announced the news that 6,250 women work in Jewish settlements.

About 20,000 Palestinians altogether work in the settlements, out of roughly 140,000 who work for Israelis altogether. This contributes a significant proportion of the Palestinian GDP, since 18.6% of all West Bank workers are working for Israelis.

In the Palestinian labor market altogether, only about 22% of workers are women, which means that proportionately, the hated settlements provide more opportunity for women than the local market.

On average, Israelis pay Palestinians more than double the salaries they receive for local jobs. The Q4 2020 Labour Force Survey for Palestinians shows that the average daily wage for those working in Israel and in settlements was 260.8 shekels compared to 123.5 shekels in the West Bank and 65.6 shekels in Gaza.



The Palestinian Labor ministry is alarmed at so many women working for "settlers" so they announced yet another program to encourage the women to work locally. They started a program worth 10 million shekels to provide jobs for women in the Jordan Valley.

Every previous time that they tried to discourage Palestinians from working for Israelis they have failed, badly. There is no reason to think this initiative will do any better - the average Palestinian is not going to take a 53% pay cut because the PA wants them to be more patriotic.

 
Secondly, there is no legal or moral requirement that Israel be singled out as the only country in the world that is required to have open borders. Israel, similar to every other country in the world, is entitled to decide who, how many, when, and under what conditions, foreigners are allowed to enter its territory.
False premise. (Big lie)

The sea coast is not an Israeli border. If there was no siege, people and goods could come and go by boat. People could come and go by air but Israel bombed the airport.
 
False premise. (Big lie)

The sea coast is not an Israeli border. If there was no siege, people and goods could come and go by boat. People could come and go by air but Israel bombed the airport.
False premise. What siege?


The Palestinian market relies heavily on Israel as a trading partner. In 2020, Palestinian imports from Israel were $2.77 billion and exports were $955 million. Business people in the West Bank are eager to diversify the number and location of their trading partners.


There is plenty to of welfare money to be used by the Pals for airports, plumbing, paved roads, etc. You choose to spend the money making splodeydopes of your children and making islamic terrorists incredibly rich.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Forum List

Back
Top