RE: Who Are The Palestinians? Part 2
SUBTOPIC: Specific Response
⁜→ P F Tinmore, et al,
BLUF: Any nation involved in a continuous conflict, of varying degrees of intensity, over a period greater than a half-century, has bound to have been involved in some questionable event. Not that I know of any particular even, but the Principle of Sufficient Reason (PSR) tells us that, somewhere along that timeline, the probabilities are very high that some such event did occur.
So where is your list of Israel's violations?
Or are you running a double standard?
(COMMENT)
.
Having said that there is that probability of an even, and knowing that since the end of the Great War (1918), atrocities have taken place that has made an indelible impression on much of humankind, does not mean that the collective events over the duration of the Arab Palestinian - Israeli conflict rise to the level warrant Israel to be accused of the Crime of Genocide, Crimes against Humanity, War Crimes, or The Crime of Aggression.
◈ Israel was not responsible for an Attack on an Olympic Village.
◈ Israel was not responsible for a single aircraft hijacking.
◈ Israel did not take a cruise ship hostage and throw a wheelchair-bound person overboard.
◈ Israel did not employ a campaign of suicide bombers.
◈ Israel did not intentionally line up men, women, and children from bus and mow them down with gunfire.
◈ etc, etc, etc,
Israel was never involved in a committed as part of a widespread or systematic attack directed against any civilian population. This differs significantly from the
open policy statements of the Arab Palestinians now trying to play the part of victims. Israel does not urge martyrdom-death for a heavenly reward, Israel does not pay stipends to bombers of places of public use, public transportation, school buses. Israel is one of the most ethnically diverse nations in the entire Middle East - North African (MENA) Region, or of any of the Arab League Gulf States. Israel is not an apartheid state where one racial group stands over any other racial group with the intention of maintaining that regime; Israel has changed regimes almost a dozen times since 1948.
Yes, there are probably events that may require investigation, but can you tell me which ones that Israel did not investigate?
The Hostile Arab Palestinians (HoAP) promote the idea that Israel opposes the aspiration for freedom, liberation, return and self-determination. I'm not sure if this allegation is true or not, where is the evidence. What is apparent is that Israel is a self-actuation nation that of its domestic laws, just as the Scandinavian states, the European States, and most of the MENA States. Israel supports and operates, from all outward appearances, the idea that no one shall be arbitrarily deprived of the right to enter or exit his own country. But nothing is without exception. Israel will take those steps necessary to protect national security (including sovereignty and territorial integrity), public order, public health or morals or the rights and freedoms of others. This is fully within the parameters set by the
International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights (CCPR). And it would appear to me that Israel follows the CCPR concept that those people advocating racial or religious hatred that constitutes incitement to discrimination, hostility or violence, will probably be denied entry. This again is fully within the parameters set by the
International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights (CCPR). And, obviously, those that advocate propaganda for war or incite conflict would probably be denied entry. Remember, immigration (those that were not born in Israel) is at the discretion of Israel, as it is for every single member state of the UN.
The significance of this is simple. As an example, YOU have advocated the Right of the Arab Palestinian to engage in Hostile Activities. So I would be surprised if the Israelis would allow you entry, but then it is up to them. All those anti-Israeli protestors taking part in demonstrations along the Israeli-Gaza Border might be (by a reasonable person) a HoAP and thus denied entry no matter any other cause.
What I am looking for is evidence of:
Article 7 Crimes Against Humanity • Elements of Crimes • International Criminal Court
Introduction
The last two elements for each Crime Against Humanity describe the context in which the conduct must take place. These elements clarify the requisite participation in and knowledge of a widespread or systematic attack against a civilian population.
Does anyone really believe that the ICC Prosecutor should be a hired gun of an organization designated as a Terrorist Organization by the EU States?
.
Most Respectfully,
R
.