Sacrificial Pally children for a photo op.
You folks couldn't find any young females to parade in front of the cameras?
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature currently requires accessing the site using the built-in Safari browser.
RE: Who Are The Israelis?
SUBTOPIC: Protesters
⁜→ P F Tinmore, et al,
BLUF: Usually I get your point... Not this time.
Women in bras confront Ultra-Orthodox Jews protesting against Eurovision
(COMMENT)
This is an Israeli "domestic matter." What is your point here?
Most Respectfully,
R
(COMMENT)
Deportations said:
Individual or mass forcible transfers, as well as deportations of protected persons from occupied territory to the territory of the Occupying Power or to that of any other country, occupied or not, are prohibited, regardless of their motive.
Nevertheless, the Occupying Power may undertake total or partial evacuation of a given area if the security of the population or imperative military reasons so demand. Such evacuations may not involve the displacement of protected persons outside the bounds of the occupied territory except when for material reasons it is impossible to avoid such displacement. Persons thus evacuated shall be transferred back to their homes as soon as hostilities in the area in question have ceased.
The Occupying Power undertaking such transfers or evacuations shall ensure, to the greatest practicable extent, that proper accommodation is provided to receive the protected persons, that the removals are effected in satisfactory conditions of hygiene, health, safety and nutrition, and that members of the same family are not separated.
The Protecting Power shall be informed of any transfers and evacuations as soon as they have taken place.
The Occupying Power shall not detain protected persons in an area particularly exposed to the dangers of war unless the security of the population or imperative military reasons so demand.
The Occupying Power shall not deport or transfer parts of its own civilian population into the territory it occupies.
Rome Statute of the International Criminal Court said:Article 7 (2d)
"Deportation or forcible transfer of population" means forced displacement of the persons concerned by expulsion or other coercive acts from the area in which they are lawfully present, without grounds permitted under international law;
SOURCE: Rome Statute of the International Criminal Court, page 4
Rome Statute of the International Criminal Court said:Article 22 (2) General Principle of Law → Nullum crimen sine lege1. A person shall not be criminally responsible under this Statute unless the conduct in question constitutes, at the time it takes place, a crime within the jurisdiction of the Court. 2. The definition of a crime shall be strictly construed and shall not be extended by analogy. In case of ambiguity, the definition shall be interpreted in favour of the person being investigated, prosecuted or convicted. 3. This article shall not affect the characterization of any conduct as criminal under international law independently of this Statute.
SOURCE: Rome Statute of the International Criminal Court, page 14
OK, so you posted all that stuff, but I don't understand how you can consider Israeli settlements/colonies to be legal.RE: Who Are The Palestinians?
SUBTOPIC: Settlement
⁜→ rylah, et al,
BLUF: I'm not quite sure the intent behind the cartoon; but I am sick'n'tired of hearing this talk about "illegal" settlements.
(COMMENT)
The pro-Palestinian claimants always seem to forget three important facts. When you raise these issues,
◈ There was an Israel Administrations already in place at the time HM King Hussein "announced the severance of all administrative and legal ties with the occupied West Bank." There was NO Arab Palestinian Government in place to take over.◈ In order to be "illegal." the Occupying Power must have used Deportation or Force to move the population. ◈ The definition of a crime (making it "illegal") can NOT be altered to meet the whim of an opposing entity; even if the entity was not party to the original order. The Arab Palestinians agreed to the Rome Statutes, and thus must abide by them as a consequence. See References Below with links.
Most Respectfully,
R
____________________________________
Deportations said:
Individual or mass forcible transfers, as well as deportations of protected persons from occupied territory to the territory of the Occupying Power or to that of any other country, occupied or not, are prohibited, regardless of their motive.
Nevertheless, the Occupying Power may undertake total or partial evacuation of a given area if the security of the population or imperative military reasons so demand. Such evacuations may not involve the displacement of protected persons outside the bounds of the occupied territory except when for material reasons it is impossible to avoid such displacement. Persons thus evacuated shall be transferred back to their homes as soon as hostilities in the area in question have ceased.
The Occupying Power undertaking such transfers or evacuations shall ensure, to the greatest practicable extent, that proper accommodation is provided to receive the protected persons, that the removals are effected in satisfactory conditions of hygiene, health, safety and nutrition, and that members of the same family are not separated.
The Protecting Power shall be informed of any transfers and evacuations as soon as they have taken place.
The Occupying Power shall not detain protected persons in an area particularly exposed to the dangers of war unless the security of the population or imperative military reasons so demand.
The Occupying Power shall not deport or transfer parts of its own civilian population into the territory it occupies.
Rome Statute of the International Criminal Court said:Article 7 (2d)
"Deportation or forcible transfer of population" means forced displacement of the persons concerned by expulsion or other coercive acts from the area in which they are lawfully present, without grounds permitted under international law;
SOURCE: Rome Statute of the International Criminal Court, page 4
Rome Statute of the International Criminal Court said:Article 22 (2) General Principle of Law → Nullum crimen sine lege1. A person shall not be criminally responsible under this Statute unless the conduct in question constitutes, at the time it takes place, a crime within the jurisdiction of the Court. 2. The definition of a crime shall be strictly construed and shall not be extended by analogy. In case of ambiguity, the definition shall be interpreted in favour of the person being investigated, prosecuted or convicted. 3. This article shall not affect the characterization of any conduct as criminal under international law independently of this Statute.
SOURCE: Rome Statute of the International Criminal Court, page 14
OK, so you posted all that stuff, but I don't understand how you can consider Israeli settlements/colonies to be legal.RE: Who Are The Palestinians?
SUBTOPIC: Settlement
⁜→ rylah, et al,
BLUF: I'm not quite sure the intent behind the cartoon; but I am sick'n'tired of hearing this talk about "illegal" settlements.
(COMMENT)
The pro-Palestinian claimants always seem to forget three important facts. When you raise these issues,
◈ There was an Israel Administrations already in place at the time HM King Hussein "announced the severance of all administrative and legal ties with the occupied West Bank." There was NO Arab Palestinian Government in place to take over.◈ In order to be "illegal." the Occupying Power must have used Deportation or Force to move the population. ◈ The definition of a crime (making it "illegal") can NOT be altered to meet the whim of an opposing entity; even if the entity was not party to the original order. The Arab Palestinians agreed to the Rome Statutes, and thus must abide by them as a consequence. See References Below with links.
Most Respectfully,
R
____________________________________
Deportations said:
Individual or mass forcible transfers, as well as deportations of protected persons from occupied territory to the territory of the Occupying Power or to that of any other country, occupied or not, are prohibited, regardless of their motive.
Nevertheless, the Occupying Power may undertake total or partial evacuation of a given area if the security of the population or imperative military reasons so demand. Such evacuations may not involve the displacement of protected persons outside the bounds of the occupied territory except when for material reasons it is impossible to avoid such displacement. Persons thus evacuated shall be transferred back to their homes as soon as hostilities in the area in question have ceased.
The Occupying Power undertaking such transfers or evacuations shall ensure, to the greatest practicable extent, that proper accommodation is provided to receive the protected persons, that the removals are effected in satisfactory conditions of hygiene, health, safety and nutrition, and that members of the same family are not separated.
The Protecting Power shall be informed of any transfers and evacuations as soon as they have taken place.
The Occupying Power shall not detain protected persons in an area particularly exposed to the dangers of war unless the security of the population or imperative military reasons so demand.
The Occupying Power shall not deport or transfer parts of its own civilian population into the territory it occupies.
Rome Statute of the International Criminal Court said:Article 7 (2d)
"Deportation or forcible transfer of population" means forced displacement of the persons concerned by expulsion or other coercive acts from the area in which they are lawfully present, without grounds permitted under international law;
SOURCE: Rome Statute of the International Criminal Court, page 4
Rome Statute of the International Criminal Court said:Article 22 (2) General Principle of Law → Nullum crimen sine lege1. A person shall not be criminally responsible under this Statute unless the conduct in question constitutes, at the time it takes place, a crime within the jurisdiction of the Court. 2. The definition of a crime shall be strictly construed and shall not be extended by analogy. In case of ambiguity, the definition shall be interpreted in favour of the person being investigated, prosecuted or convicted. 3. This article shall not affect the characterization of any conduct as criminal under international law independently of this Statute.
SOURCE: Rome Statute of the International Criminal Court, page 14
(COMMENT)OK, so you posted all that stuff, but I don't understand how you can consider Israeli settlements/colonies to be legal.