White Christian nationalists are poised to remake America in their image during Trump's second term

.

I don't need to convince the people I know on how to vote ...
They tend to be fairly well educated and can make up their own minds.

In fact ... Quite a few of them can do a damn sight better job of analyzing broad spectrum trending data ...
Than you seem to be able to manage with any proficiency.

You don't understand do you ... There's nothing you can say.
Every thought that crosses your mind is polluted ... :thup:
So let me get this straight, I am supposed to try to get black folks to vote the way I want them to, but you on the other hand don't need to do that.
 
So let me get this straight, I am supposed to try to get black folks to vote the way I want them to, but you on the other hand don't need to do that.
African Americans have maxxed out voting Prog.
 
Smug about your data analysis, huh?
Some people vote with their gut, others with their heart, most vote their wallets.
I made a good living proving the data said what I wanted it to say, just sayin'
.

Smug ... Or whatever you may choose to call it ... Doesn't make it wrong.

In fact ... You're pretty stupid if you think that emotions or gut feelings ... Or what you want ...
Are any suitable basis for interpreting data.

The fact you don't know that ... Doesn't really support your desires ...
And is another example of how people use an agenda to corrupt data ...
And how every thought crossing that person's mind is polluted.

Not just saying ... Because that's a fact ... Whether or not you want to, or feel like agreeing ... :thup:
Sorry your pathetic ideology feels threatened ... Well, not really sorry.

.
 
Last edited:
So let me get this straight, I am supposed to try to get black folks to vote the way I want them to, but you on the other hand don't need to do that.
.

You're not trying to get anything straight ... Because you cannot understand what I am saying.
You feel you need to convince black people how to vote ... And to suit your agenda.

I don't care how my friends and neighbors vote ... I trust them to know what they think is best ...
And there are times we disagree.

Your ideology doesn't allow for that ... And that's what I meant by ...
Every thought that crosses your mind is polluted ... :thup:

.
 
Remake it into what the Founders intended.

As John Adams said, the Constitution s made for a moral people and there is nothing moral about DEI and LGBTQ+ nonsense. Nor about ridiculous migration from shithole nations.

You have no concept of morality whatsoever. Jesus commanded you to take in and care for those who cannot help themselves. See the parable of the Good Samaritan.

There is absolutely nothing moral about turning away strangers. It’s in the Bible in multiple places, including Sodom and Gomorrah.

As for homosexuality, Jesus didn’t even mention it but He did to treat others as you would like to treated. That means that you treat homosexual and people that you disagree with respectfully and with kindness.

The Biblical punishment for adultery is death, so that would leave Trump and Musk and all of your right wing leaders, dead.
 
.Smug ... Or whatever you may choose to call it ... Doesn't make it wrong.
In fact ... You're pretty stupid if you think that emotions or gut feelings ... Or what you want ...
Are any suitable basis for interpreting data.
The fact you don't know that ... Doesn't really support your desires ...
And is another example of how people use an agenda to corrupt data ... And how every thought crossing that person's mind is polluted.
Not just saying ... Because that's a fact ... Whether or not you want to, or feel like agreeing ... :thup:
Sorry your pathetic ideology feels threatened ... Well, not really sorry.​
Interpreting Data may be the center of your universe, but it's not for most people
You sound like a "one trick pony", often wrong but never in doubt.
You did not refute my assertion that most people do not vote based on data analysis, because that's apparently all you know
Data analysis has its place, such as risk analysis, or financial analysis, but as for analyzing "slanted" polling data probably not as accurate

Here is just one example, when Hillary has a 95% probability of winning in 2016
 
Last edited:
Smug about your data analysis, huh?
Some people vote with their gut, others with their heart, most vote their wallets.
I made a good living proving the data said what I wanted it to say, just sayin'

So you made a good living manipulating “data to say what you wanted it to say.

The idea of a study is to look at something and then interpret the data not decide on a conclusion and manipulate the data to verify what you wanted to say.
 
.

Well ...That's an improvement for President Trump by any statistical measure.

Perhaps you should be asking "how" and "why" ... Instead of foolish attempts to ignore it and pretend it isn't there.
But don't worry ... It's a common mistake people make when analyzing broad spectrum trending.

They tend to be too stupid to figure out there are variables that have significant influence over the trends ...
But in all reality ... Cannot be accurately narrowed down to the polluted agenda they are trying to support.

"There's Lies ... Damn Lies ... And Statistics"
They are only as good as the person looking at them ... :thup:

.
It's there, and as long as it does not grow significantly, Black Sand, as long as it is not more than 2%, it does not matter.
 
Interpreting Data may be the center of your universe, but it's not for most people
You sound like a "one trick pony", often wrong but never in doubt.
You did not refute my assertion that most people do not vote based on data analysis, because that's apparently all you know
Data analysis has its place, such as risk analysis, or financial analysis, but as for analyzing "slanted" polling data probably not as accurate
.

I am sure I sound like a whole lot of things to you ... Not like that really makes a difference.

You're a messed-up pile of emotions ... Blind to your own inadequacies ...
And think you have a leg to stand on ...With the argument you just poorly attempted to present.

It's not that I am consumed by data and its interpretations ...
It's just really not that hard to escape the idiocy you would pursue in data.

The fact that you don't get that ... Is exactly what I am talking about.

I am pretty sure you probably made a lot of money in data analysis ...
Because you wouldn't have a problem telling someone what they wanted to hear ...
And you couldn't keep that from influencing the data.

The same way you think you have an argument to stand on now ... :thup:

.
 
“There’s an image that captures the threat posed by the White Christian nationalist movement — and how it could become even more dangerous over the next four years.

Taken during the Jan. 6 insurrection, the photo shows a solitary White man, his head pressed in prayer against a massive wooden cross, facing the domed US Capitol building. An American flag stands like a sentinel on a flagpole beside the Capitol under an ominously gray sky.

The photograph depicts a foot soldier in an insurgent religious movement trying to storm the halls of American power. What’s unsettling about the photo four years later is that much of the religious zeal that fed the insurrection is no longer outside the gates of power. Many of that movement’s followers are now on the inside, because their Chosen One, Donald Trump, returns this month to the Oval Office.

This is the scenario Americans could face in Trump’s second term. Under Trump, Christian nationalists will have unprecedented access to the power of the federal government. Trump’s GOP has unified control of Congress. And a conservative supermajority, which has already blurred the line between separation of church and state in a series of decisions favoring Christian interests, controls the US Supreme Court.”


White Christian nationalists are yet another manifestation of the fascist right, another threat to our democratic institutions and protected liberties.

And with a Supreme Court dominated by partisan conservative ideologues hostile to settled, accepted Establishment Clause jurisprudence, realizing the goal of white Christian nationalists to conjoin church and state is real and imminent.
Democracy, right?
 
pontificate, pupster, pontificate
.

You may require a deeper explanation ... I don't ... :thup:

If you want to discuss something ... Have the courage to say it ...
Or continue to think you can hide behind the vapid emptiness you generally post.

.
 
.

You may require a deeper explanation ... I don't ... :thup:

If you want to discuss something ... Have the courage to say it ...
Or continue to think you can hide behind the vapid emptiness you generally post.

.
Who is questioning your courage? It is your sense no one is sure about.
 
Who is questioning your courage? It is your sense no one is sure about.
.

I understand that ... And still you have said nothing.
You can think whatever you want ... And that is of no consequence to me.
That doesn't even require courage ... And you don't understand that ... :thup:
.
 
.

I understand that ... And still you have said nothing.
You can think whatever you want ... And that is of no consequence to me.
That doesn't even require courage ... And you don't understand that ... :thup:
.
You sure are jumping like an eel of an skille, but, OK, you big and tough. :)
 
You sure are jumping like an eel of an skille, but, OK, you big and tough. :)
.

There's nothing tough about it ... Unless you choose to struggle with it longer.
You're really telling me how it makes you feel ... And what your insecurities are ... Not mine.

But I don't expect you could understand something as simple as that ... :thup:

.
 
.I am sure I sound like a whole lot of things to you ... Not like that really makes a difference.
You're a messed-up pile of emotions ... Blind to your own inadequacies ...
And think you have a leg to stand on ...With the argument you just poorly attempted to present.
It's not that I am consumed by data and its interpretations ...
It's just really not that hard to escape the idiocy you would pursue in data.
The fact that you don't get that ... Is exactly what I am talking about.
I am pretty sure you probably made a lot of money in data analysis ...
Because you wouldn't have a problem telling someone what they wanted to hear ...
And you couldn't keep that from influencing the data.
The same way you think you have an argument to stand on now ... :thup:
If you put up an argument in that post I missed it. Have a nice day!
I sincerely hope you enjoy your work, it sounds like you do, when you enjoy your work you never have to work a day in your life.
 
If you put up an argument in that post I missed it. Have a nice day!
I sincerely hope you enjoy your work, it sounds like you do, when you enjoy your work you never have to work a day in your life.
.

Thanks man ... No argument about the benefits of enjoying what you do for a living.

That's something that is evident every day if you are lucky enough to get there.
However ...It's still nice when you find people who understand it ...
Gives you some faith in the idea we just might not be doomed.

Apathy and complacency are fucking Dream Killers ...
And you have a lovely day too ... :thup:

.
 
Back
Top Bottom