White Christian nationalists are poised to remake America in their image during Trump's second term

He was definitely a Visionary and he was a a man of GOD. America hated Dr King when he was living, he approval rating was about 38%, this love affair by folks like you didn't come until after he was murdered. 1963 King was totally different than 1968 King.

To be clear, I personally don't love MLK. I think he was a lefty and his movement, which is took in the wrong direrction, has been a diaster that just keeps giving.

BUT, he is loved and defied by America, especially from the left and your black community.

ANd you and your anti-Christian bigotry, is pissing all over him and his entire movement.



This is why you murdered Dr King and I mean White America.


Except it was one shooter. And White America supported civil rights for blacks. It was a fairly small minority that was using political alliances and legislative games to hold on to old policies.

So.... this point? is it to justify your hate of whites? Cause your claim is false.





If it was supported by the vast majority of Christians there would have been no need for a Civil Rights Movement. Were you living during that time? I was.

The racists of the south had a political alliance with the progressive dems of the north and together they were able to provide political protection for the racist poilicies of the south.

Despite being in the minority of the population.

It was clever of the racist of the south to use their remaining political power to do that.

I can't speak to why the progressive dems of the north were willing to cooperate. I guess it was the only way they could win elections. Though they didn't win many elections during that time...

So... just to be dicks?



Spare me that bullshit, what % of white males do you think lost out on a job or promotion because of DEI or diversity?

A lot. It is hard to track in most cases, because lefties lie. But there are some times and places where you can see how big the discrimination is, like IVY LEAGUE admission stats.




How many white males do you think have gotten jobs or promotions they didn't deserve?

Interesting. I note that you don't even limit it to "From racist discrimination".

So, a white son inhereting his dad's small business, would count.

That you needed to play such a game, shows that you know that my point is valid.


The same right wing, racist excuses we have been hearing for years.


You ask why conservatives don't discuss the white immigration issue, and I point out that the vast majority of immigraiton is non-white and you dismiss that as an excuse?

LOL. You are just talking shit now. That was dumb.
 
Your denial of wide spread and well known policy is dumb.

I have had plenty of trouble getting job(s) is my life. Plenty, nearly ALL "white boys" have.

The negative outcome for a "White boy" of being denied a job is "far, far less"?

That's a dumb claim too. You get denied a job, or a better job, you are stuck where you are at.


I was in management at one point when they decided that they needed more diversity in the management team. So, I was moving to another facility (sidewises, new purchase being integrated) and my position was being filled.

I recommended the obvious choice, a staff member with a lot of experience and the best production numbers, who happened to be an older white guy.

He was dismissed, as they had already decided that the new hire was going to be a black woman.

This was a huge and rare promotion. When I got it, it took me from working poor to middle class. I went from not being able to afford to have a car, to visit my mother, to taking her on a caribbean cruise.

The harm to that guy being denied the promotion he was most qualified for, was real and huge. And not just to him, but to his two daughters.

Your lack of concern for him, is just you being a bad person. It is not fair, it is not just.
Correll says racism does not exist. You are an idiot.
 
No DC elected Politician wants to make America Idaho again ( or Alabama)
 
Said thte man who responded to a post without addressing anythign I said.

You don't think you are fooling anyone, do you?
Correll, you are the dupe of USMB along with daveman, rawley, and rambunctious.
 
To be clear, I personally don't love MLK. I think he was a lefty and his movement, which is took in the wrong direrction, has been a diaster that just keeps giving.
I am pretty sure you don't, I'm sure no one is surprised by that.
BUT, he is loved and defied by America, especially from the left and your black community.
You mean now that he is dead.
ANd you and your anti-Christian bigotry, is pissing all over him and his entire movement.
You mean the Christians that enslaved black folks, you mean Christians that brutalized, raped, maimed, burned, lynched and murdered black folks. You mean the Christians that treated black folks as 3rd class citizens for almost 100yrs, those Christians?
Except it was one shooter.
That's what we were told.
And White America supported civil rights for blacks. It was a fairly small minority that was using political alliances and legislative games to hold on to old policies.
A small minority? So from Virginia to Louisiana is what you call a small minority and let's not forget the racism that was taking place in the North as well.
So.... this point? is it to justify your hate of whites? Cause your claim is false.
Justify my hate for whites, so how are the folks who were on the receiving end of hate the haters? Explain that.
What claim have I made that is false?
The racists of the south had a political alliance with the progressive dems of the north and together they were able to provide political protection for the racist poilicies of the south.

Despite being in the minority of the population.

It was clever of the racist of the south to use their remaining political power to do that.

I can't speak to why the progressive dems of the north were willing to cooperate. I guess it was the only way they could win elections. Though they didn't win many elections during that time...

So... just to be dicks?
It's amazing how folks rewrite history into his-story.
A lot. It is hard to track in most cases, because lefties lie. But there are some times and places where you can see how big the discrimination is, like IVY LEAGUE admission stats.
Take any Ivy League school and give me the racial breakdown of that student body.
Interesting. I note that you don't even limit it to "From racist discrimination".

So, a white son inhereting his dad's small business, would count.

That you needed to play such a game, shows that you know that my point is valid.
Hmmm, tell me how a minority could take a white son's business that his daddy owned. See you right wing racist love making statements and then when asked to prove them you come back with bullshit.
You ask why conservatives don't discuss the white immigration issue, and I point out that the vast majority of immigraiton is non-white and you dismiss that as an excuse?
Is that in the last 10yrs, 20yrs, 50yrs, 100yrs, etc.? Are you saying that whites no longer immigrate to America?
1739829336674.webp

LOL. You are just talking shit now. That was dumb.

Was it?
 
I am pretty sure you don't, I'm sure no one is surprised by that.

Good. I didn't want to give the wrong impression.

You mean now that he is dead.

Correct. Like I said.


You mean the Christians that enslaved black folks, you mean Christians that brutalized, raped, maimed, burned, lynched and murdered black folks. You mean the Christians that treated black folks as 3rd class citizens for almost 100yrs, those Christians?

Nope. I mean the Christians that supported him, that his entire movement was set up to appeal to .

I was clear about that, did you really not get it? Oh wait, you were just pretending to not understand my point so that you could talk more shit on Christians?

Do you even realize that you just proved my point about your anti-Christian bigotry?


That's what we were told.

If it was two or three, it would stil lbe the same point. Your holding "whites" responsible for it, is just your bigotry and racism.

A small minority? So from Virginia to Louisiana is what you call a small minority and let's not forget the racism that was taking place in the North as well.

Correct. A faction of a faction of hte country. The South is a quarter of the country and the dem machine was all about controlling and preventing real democracy even in the south... So, who knows what the real level of support was.
Justify my hate for whites, so how are the folks who were on the receiving end of hate the haters? Explain that.

Easy. Yes, your people were hated in the past by some people. Today YOU are the hater.


WHat part of that is confusing to you?



What claim have I made that is false?

It's amazing how folks rewrite history into his-story.

Take any Ivy League school and give me the racial breakdown of that student body.

Those numbers are driving by the break up on the black family. THey would and should be worse, but for the counter weighting effecgt of dei and diversity.

And you know that.



Hmmm, tell me how a minority could take a white son's business that his daddy owned. See you right wing racist love making statements and then when asked to prove them you come back with bullshit.

I said nothing like that.


Is that in the last 10yrs, 20yrs, 50yrs, 100yrs, etc.? Are you saying that whites no longer immigrate to America?


I said nothing like that. I said that the current wave is vastly non white. As your numbers show, so your stupid question is answered.


 
Correll is simply no good at this, anymore than Griffin is at history or PoliticalChic at commentary. Just pathetic.
 
“There’s an image that captures the threat posed by the White Christian nationalist movement — and how it could become even more dangerous over the next four years.

Taken during the Jan. 6 insurrection, the photo shows a solitary White man, his head pressed in prayer against a massive wooden cross, facing the domed US Capitol building. An American flag stands like a sentinel on a flagpole beside the Capitol under an ominously gray sky.

The photograph depicts a foot soldier in an insurgent religious movement trying to storm the halls of American power. What’s unsettling about the photo four years later is that much of the religious zeal that fed the insurrection is no longer outside the gates of power. Many of that movement’s followers are now on the inside, because their Chosen One, Donald Trump, returns this month to the Oval Office.

This is the scenario Americans could face in Trump’s second term. Under Trump, Christian nationalists will have unprecedented access to the power of the federal government. Trump’s GOP has unified control of Congress. And a conservative supermajority, which has already blurred the line between separation of church and state in a series of decisions favoring Christian interests, controls the US Supreme Court.”


White Christian nationalists are yet another manifestation of the fascist right, another threat to our democratic institutions and protected liberties.

And with a Supreme Court dominated by partisan conservative ideologues hostile to settled, accepted Establishment Clause jurisprudence, realizing the goal of white Christian nationalists to conjoin church and state is real and imminent.
:auiqs.jpg: :auiqs.jpg::auiqs.jpg::auiqs.jpg:

Remake?
That's the one of the dumbest things I have heard on this site. You are definitely a "special" creature to think that and say this.

The word is "RESTORE"....as in it always was intended to be.

You can return to your regularly scheduled delusions.
 
Correll is simply no good at this, anymore than Griffin is at history or PoliticalChic at commentary. Just pathetic.

Buddy, everyone can see that I have made good points and you and yours have failed to address any of them.
 
Good. I didn't want to give the wrong impression.
No chance of that.
Correct. Like I said.
Incorrect like you said, Dr King was hated when he was alive.
Nope. I mean the Christians that supported him, that his entire movement was set up to appeal to .

I was clear about that, did you really not get it? Oh wait, you were just pretending to not understand my point so that you could talk more shit on Christians?

Do you even realize that you just proved my point about your anti-Christian bigotry?
It was Christians that were giving him and black folks hell.
If it was two or three, it would stil lbe the same point. Your holding "whites" responsible for it, is just your bigotry and racism.
Who was responsible for it?
Correct. A faction of a faction of hte country. The South is a quarter of the country and the dem machine was all about controlling and preventing real democracy even in the south... So, who knows what the real level of support was.
So, the racism and bigotry was just in the South, Bill Russell would disagree with you, Sam Davis Jr would disagree with you and they were not in the South.
Easy. Yes, your people were hated in the past by some people. Today YOU are the hater.
Yep, by the same folks who hate us today.
WHat part of that is confusing to you?
Smfh.
Those numbers are driving by the break up on the black family. THey would and should be worse, but for the counter weighting effecgt of dei and diversity.
Let's look at a few.

Harvard University has a student population with the following racial breakdown12:

  • American Indian/Native American: 63
  • White: 9,917
  • Black/African American: 1,958
  • Asian: 4,495
  • Hispanic: 2,804
  • Native Hawaiian or Other Pacific Islander: 33
  • Other races: 1,496
How many black students do you think were at Harvard in 1965?

Yale University has a student population with the following racial breakdown

White4,673
International2,546
Asian1,959
Hispanic1,281
Black or African American788
Multi-Ethnic593
Unknown175
Native Hawaiian or Pacific Islander15
[th]
Race/Ethnicity​
[/th][th]
Number​
[/th]​

How many black students do you think attended Yale in 1965?

I said nothing like that. I said that the current wave is vastly non white. As your numbers show, so your stupid question is answered.
The point is for most of the history of this country immigrants were white, correct?
 
....

Incorrect like you said, Dr King was hated when he was alive.

Hatred is a strong word. The vast majority of white Americans agreed on equality for blacks but most did not like the way he went about it, ie encourging violence and using children as photo props, ect.


It was Christians that were giving him and black folks hell.

And again, the lefty defines the majority by the actions of the minority.

It is a weird problem we see a lot with their way of thinking.


Who was responsible for it?

NOt whites as a race, which is what your racist butt was trying to get to.

So, the racism and bigotry was just in the South, Bill Russell would disagree with you, Sam Davis Jr would disagree with you and they were not in the South.

ONce the dem party of the north, broke with the dem party of the south, the entire structure of jim crow collapsed in short order.

That was the end of their ability to block change with legislative gridlock.

So, it seems that the power bloc you are pointing to, held on against the tide of white public opinion for quite some time.


Yep, by the same folks who hate us today.

Nope. White America has had a consensus on equality for blacks, not hating you, since the mid 60s.

For you to deny that reality and to smear us as racist, is you being dishonest and racist in turn.

Today, you are the hater.

Smfh.

Let's look at a few.

Harvard University has a student population with the following racial breakdown12:

  • American Indian/Native American: 63
  • White: 9,917
  • Black/African American: 1,958
  • Asian: 4,495
  • Hispanic: 2,804
  • Native Hawaiian or Other Pacific Islander: 33
  • Other races: 1,496
How many black students do you think were at Harvard in 1965?

Yale University has a student population with the following racial breakdown


White4,673
International2,546
Asian1,959
Hispanic1,281
Black or African American788
Multi-Ethnic593
Unknown175
Native Hawaiian or Pacific Islander15

[th]
Race/Ethnicity

[/th][th]
Number

[/th]​


How many black students do you think attended Yale in 1965?

Irrelevant to the discrimination taking place.



The point is for most of the history of this country immigrants were white, correct?

NO, you asked why maga TODAY, speaks mostly of brown immigrants. My point was that immigration TODAY is mostly brown immigrants.

That was your question and my answer.


Citing data on immigration waves from past CENTURIES, is irrelevant and stupid.
 
Hatred is a strong word. The vast majority of white Americans agreed on equality for blacks but most did not like the way he went about it, ie encourging violence and using children as photo props, ect.
Here is another example of his-story. Give us some examples of Dr King encouraging violence. So white Christians brutalizing black children was a plot by Dr King to use as phot props. See folks you can't make this shit up.
And again, the lefty defines the majority by the actions of the minority.

It is a weird problem we see a lot with their way of thinking.
So, let's see we had 200 yrs of slavery and then almost 100yrs of Jim Crow, but you are telling us that it was a small minority that was responsible for it.
NOt whites as a race, which is what your racist butt was trying to get to.
Hmmm, so it was white as what exactly?
ONce the dem party of the north, broke with the dem party of the south, the entire structure of jim crow collapsed in short order.

That was the end of their ability to block change with legislative gridlock.

So, it seems that the power bloc you are pointing to, held on against the tide of white public opinion for quite some time.
How many Republicans in the South fought for Civil Rights legislation?
Nope. White America has had a consensus on equality for blacks, not hating you, since the mid 60s.

For you to deny that reality and to smear us as racist, is you being dishonest and racist in turn.

Today, you are the hater.
So, who was responsible for racism, hatred and discrimination against black folks?
Irrelevant to the discrimination taking place.
What discrimination would that be?
NO, you asked why maga TODAY, speaks mostly of brown immigrants. My point was that immigration TODAY is mostly brown immigrants.

That was your question and my answer.


Citing data on immigration waves from past CENTURIES, is irrelevant and stupid.
MAGA today is equal to the mindset of the sheet wearers of yesterday.
 
Buddy, everyone can see that I have made good points and you and yours have failed to address any of them.
You have disagreed is all that you have done.

Who agrees with you? No one of any importance.
 
Back
Top Bottom