Which political party gets credit for more job creation?

You stupidly wrote:
Those three Republican Presidents created a total of 200,000 jobs
The three Democrats created 48 million jobs


YOU are so stupid: The 3 GOP created: 35,508,000
FACTS not guesses: The 3 Dems created: 44,328,000


GEEZ now people do you see why the Democrats are so f...ked up and WRONG !
View attachment 801038jobs" and the numbers are right there in the chart in front of him!
Keep it up dummy as you are continuing to show why people like you are so truly dumb!

LOL

You are utterly insane. :cuckoo:

You think Bush41, Bush43 and Trump added 35½ million jobs???

Post their individual job gains...
 
Now as almost all complicated issues... this requires just a little reading so I've highlighted in color what happened which WAS NOT Bush's fault!
Obama brought the housing bubble through his 1995 Lawsuit against Citibank which really dumb people like you either are unaware or ignore but either way this caused the collapse of 2008 as a Democrat

Obviously you never heard of the Citibank lawsuit of 1995 and according to a key DEMOCRAT leader, who said:
"it was a great mistake to push lower-income people into housing they couldn't afford and couldn't really handle once they had it
NOW since YOUR responses generally have NO substantiation but GUESSES by you and exaggeration by you here are the FACTS about the housing bubble!
President Barack Obama was a pioneering contributor to the national subprime real estate bubble, and roughly half of the 186 African-American clients in his landmark 1995 mortgage discrimination lawsuit against Citibank have since gone bankrupt or received foreclosure notices. As few as 19 of those 186 clients still own homes with clean credit ratings, following a decade in which Obama and other progressives pushed banks to provide mortgages to poor African Americans.
"Redlining," the activists argued, was the antithesis of the American dream of owning a home. Moreover, they insisted, everyone had the "right" to own a home. So the banks were forced to issue loans to people who couldn't afford to pay them back. The banking system was forced to inflate a housing bubble that set us up for a near-catastrophic economic collapse.
As the Daily Caller relates, "Obama's lawsuit was one element of a national 'anti-redlining' campaign led by Chicago's progressive groups, who argued that banks unfairly refused to lend money to people living within so-called 'red lines' around African-American communities."

That settlement was only the tip of the iceberg.
When Citibank, in April 1998, sought federal approval for a merger with Travelers Group, it only got OK from the Clinton administration progressives after it promised in May to provide $115 billion for anti-redlining loans. Anti-redlining promises made by other financial institutions added up to $600 billion between 1993 and 1998, according to a 2000 Treasury Department report.
It was the progressive dreams of Barack Obama that would crash the nation's economy in 2008, wipe out at least $4 trillion in equity and help keep the unemployment rate above 8% for four years.
As president, Obama would blame his predecessor, George W. Bush, and Wall Street. But before the housing market finally collapsed, it was a young lawyer named Barack Obama who helped put the wrecking ball in motion
NOW here is an important politician during this time WHO NOW SAYS IT WAS A MISTAKE!!!
For years, Barney Frank (Frank served as chairman of the House Financial Services Committee from 2007 to 2011 and was a leading co-sponsor of the 2010 Dodd–Frank Act.) was a staunch supporter of Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac, the giant government housing agencies that played such an enormous role in the financial meltdown that thrust the economy into the Great Recession.
But in a recent CNBC interview, Frank told me that he was ready to say goodbye to Fannie and Freddie.
"I hope by next year we'll have abolished Fannie and Freddie," he said. Remarkable. And he went on to say that
"it was a great mistake to push lower-income people into housing they couldn't afford and couldn't really handle once they had it." He then added, "I had been too sanguine about Fannie and Freddie."

:cuckoo:
 

"Which political party gets credit for more job creation?"​

The "small to medium sized companies" party. Oh, that isn't a political party that is part of the duopoly? It must not be important, then.
Taking credit for things is what the duopoly is largely about, unless there are any negative consequences involved.
 
Excuses.
Thats all republicans have in life.
Excuses for repeated failure.

Bush and the GOP inherited a balanced budget, then they passed massive spending bills and started 2 wars they couldn't win. Then they blew uop the economy

Bush and the republicans did that, and they only have themselves to blame.

The republicans have been a total failure for the past 100 years, 11 if the last 12 recessions all under failed GOP. every republican has had a recesion for the past 100 years. Only 1 dem had a recession in that same time.

"You are what your record says you are"
Bill Parcells

The worst economies we had were started under Republican presidents. The Great Depression, the Great Recession and covid; with the first 2 related to economic policies.

And in the history of this nation, there's been a recession under every single Republican president except for the one who was in office for only 1 month.
 
We are finally back where we were pre covid... sure took Joe a long time to get us there... and prices are still too high... man the grocery store prices are ridiculous....

Name another president in all of U.S. history who had 13 million jobs added in 2½ years...
 
OP draws the odd conclusion that somehow cutting taxes results in more jobs.

History has shown that when taxes are cut, the wealthy just keep the extra profit

US companies' tax windfall fuels record share buybacks​

1688473397295.png
AP News
https://apnews.com › article

Apr 4, 2019 — U.S. corporations spent a record amount buying back their own shares last year, using 2017's tax-cut windfall to reward shareholders rather ...

Companies in the S&P 500 spent $806 billion on stock buybacks in 2018, blowing away the previous record of nearly $590 billion set in 2007. The information technology and financial service sectors were the biggest spenders, with Apple leading the pack. When share prices plunged in the fourth quarter it only encouraged companies to spend more, setting a fourth consecutive quarterly record for buybacks.

Who was president in 2007?
 

US companies' tax windfall fuels record share buybacks

View attachment 801232
AP News
https://apnews.com › article
Apr 4, 2019 — U.S. corporations spent a record amount buying back their own shares last year, using 2017's tax-cut windfall to reward shareholders rather ...

Companies in the S&P 500 spent $806 billion on stock buybacks in 2018, blowing away the previous record of nearly $590 billion set in 2007. The information technology and financial service sectors were the biggest spenders, with Apple leading the pack. When share prices plunged in the fourth quarter it only encouraged companies to spend more, setting a fourth consecutive quarterly record for buybacks.

Who was president in 2007?
Republicans sell the myth that cutting taxes results in more hiring, business expansion and higher wages….trickle down

As has repeatedly been shown, corporations just keep the money and like you said, buy back stock
 
And the BIG difference between your above post... IS all your opinion! NOT one single FACT!!!
How about THESE FACTS!!!

BY a Democrat!!!
For years, Barney Frank (Frank served as chairman of the House Financial Services Committee from 2007 to 2011 and was a leading co-sponsor of the 2010 Dodd–Frank Act.) was a staunch supporter of Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac, the giant government housing agencies that played such an enormous role in the financial meltdown that thrust the economy into the Great Recession.
But in a recent CNBC interview, Frank told me that he was ready to say goodbye to Fannie and Freddie.
"I hope by next year we'll have abolished Fannie and Freddie," he said. Remarkable. And he went on to say that
"it was a great mistake to push lower-income people into housing they couldn't afford and couldn't really handle once they had it." He then added, "I had been too sanguine about Fannie and Freddie."

And who pushed this?? The Democrats!
DUMMY where are YOUR FACTS???
Are the Clintons the real housing crash villains?
PUBLISHED SAT, MAY 28 201612:50 AM EDTUPDATED SAT, MAY 28 20169:06 AM EDT
What's more, in the Clinton push to issue home loans to lower income borrowers, Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac made a common practice to virtually end credit documentation, low credit scores were disregarded, and income and job history was also thrown aside. The phrase “subprime” became commonplace

Imbecile, by 2007, the damage was done. In 2005, the bubble began bursting. In 2006, we had a record number of foreclosures up until that point. In April, 2007, the nation's 2nd largest lender filed for bankruptcy. Nothing Barney Frank did caused any of that. He was just one member of the minority party until 2007.
 
Republicans sell the myth that cutting taxes results in more hiring and higher wages….trickle down
The sad part is, after 43 years, they still believe it.
As has repeatedly been shown, corporations just keep the money and like you said, buy back stock
Which makes, the rich, richer, just like Trump said.

December 24 2017
President Trump kicked off his holiday weekend at Mar-a-Lago Friday night at a dinner where he told friends, "You all just got a lot richer," referencing the sweeping tax overhaul he signed into law hours earlier.

The president has spent many weekends of his presidency so far at the "Winter White House," where initiation fees cost $200,000, annual dues cost $14,000, and some of the most affluent members of society have the opportunity to interact with the president in a setting while many Americans cannot.
 
Imbecile, by 2007, the damage was done. In 2005, the bubble began bursting. In 2006, we had a record number of foreclosures up until that point. In April, 2007, the nation's 2nd largest lender filed for bankruptcy. Nothing Barney Frank did caused any of that. He was just one member of the minority party until 2007.

Blame the gay guy

The worst culprit was George Bush who refused to take any action until the election was over.
Thankfully, Obama came in and rescued the economy
 
Wage price controls killed alot of jobs. The same thing is happening with robots replacing employees at fast food restaraunts.
Robots will replace capitalism. Keep automating the economy, thanks.

Best regards, your friendly neighborhood socialist.
 

Forum List

Back
Top