Which Party Defends The Constitutions?

[PoliticalChic]

1.Seems to be a strange question, as the Constitution is the ‘law of the land,’ meaning that all Americans live under the rules set forth by that document.

Shouldn’t the answer be…’both parties.’ If only that were the case.



2. As documented in a number of threads, there is no Far Right in America, but certainly is a Far Left, radicals who have taken over one of the parties….the Democrats. A reminder: To be "far," one's positions must be radical relative to that center. American traditions, values, and history represent that center. The Right, represented by the Republican Party, has no radial positions not consistent with America’s heritage…..but the Democrats sure do!

3. Subservient to the master they serve, the Democrat Party is now running on full-blown anti-white racism, socialism, infanticide, opposition to free speech, substituting illegal alien voters for the American citizenry, and anti-Semitism… the knuckle-dragging, atavistic pagan party.

Talk about “Far”!!!!



4. A glaring example, this week, is this Republican administration standing behind Americans and the first amendment.

“Unlike Eric Holder’s Justice Department, the Trump administration is on the forefront of defending First Amendment religious liberty. This Tuesday, Justice Department Civil Rights Division lawyers will be appearing in an Indiana state court to defend the religious freedom of Catholic schools.

The First Amendment protects the free exercise of religious beliefs. Churches have the First Amendment right to ensure that employees teaching children in church schools are espousing church theology and that the public portion of their lives that manifest in the classroom are in keeping with that theology. That is the essence of religious liberty.

Assistant Attorney General Eric Dreiband's team will personally appear to defend the Archdiocese of Indianapolis against an employment discrimination lawsuit brought by a teacher who was fired for openly flouting Catholic Church teaching on marriage.


Joshua Payne-Elliott, the former teacher at Cathedral High School and plaintiff, is suing because he was terminated from his employment as a high school teacher after openly defying church teaching on marriage and living as a married couple with another man.

When Payne-Elliott refused to modify his open opposition to Catholic teaching, he was fired from his teaching job at Cathedral High School in Indianapolis.”
Religious Liberty: Trump DOJ Defends Catholic School in State Court


They’ve got my “Amen!”

 

[BluesLegend]

Neither party does. Its a check on their power they seek to undermine and end run around.

 

[rightwinger]

Liberals wrote the Constitution

Trump pisses on it

 

[PoliticalChic]

Neither party does. Its a check on their power they seek to undermine and end run around.

How about you read the OP and apply it to your post.

 

[CarlinAnnArbor]

Liberals wrote the Constitution

Trump pisses on it

Back in the day when liberal meant today's conservative.

Statists didn't write the Constitution. Today's liberals are STATISTS. The Founders were the opposite of you

 

[Harpy Eagle]

only two parties....

the Constitution party and the Libertarian party.

 

[TNHarley]

Liberals wrote the Constitution

Trump pisses on it

Yeah REAL liberals. Not statists that claim that moniker in today's climate

 

[TNHarley]

Certainly not the duopoly!

 

[BluesLegend]

Neither party does. Its a check on their power they seek to undermine and end run around.

How about you read the OP and apply it to your post.

If you think the GOP establishment has any respect for the Constitution you don't know the GOP establishment. They are as corrupt as the Dem establishment. Don't make me bring up Boehner.

 

[22lcidw]

Liberals wrote the Constitution

Trump pisses on it

It is about freedoms. Not any form of system we have. No Federal taxation is part of it.

 

[Billy_Kinetta]

Liberals wrote the Constitution

Not your breed of "liberal".

 

[PoliticalChic]

Liberals wrote the Constitution

Trump pisses on it

Back in the day when liberal meant today's conservative.

Statists didn't write the Constitution. Today's liberals are STATISTS. The Founders were the opposite of you

Consistent with each and every post by that liar, there is absolutely no truth to his statement.

. The 'Greatest Lie" is the one that the modern Liberals tell. They claim that those called Liberals today are the liberals who founded this great nation. Nothing could be further from the truth. The Founders were 'classical liberals,' whose vision included . individualism, free markets, and limited constitutional government. That's why they wrote out a detailed Constitution.

a. Communist John Dewey, the one who corrupted education in this country, convinced the Socialist Party to change its name to 'Liberal.' And it's values and doctrines formed those called Liberals today.


The benefit to them, of course, is that the uninformed attribute the greatness of the Founders, of America, to them.

 

[PoliticalChic]

Neither party does. Its a check on their power they seek to undermine and end run around.

How about you read the OP and apply it to your post.

If you think the GOP establishment has any respect for the Constitution you don't know the GOP establishment. They are as corrupt as the Dem establishment. Don't make me bring up Boehner.

The aim of the OP is not as a shotgun...but as a sniper rifle.

You may or may not be correct in your claim....that is for another time and another thread.

As for this specific one, I laid the groundwork for the premise, and documented it with the article.


This:

The First Amendment protects the free exercise of religious beliefs. Churches have the First Amendment right to ensure that employees teaching children in church schools are espousing church theology and that the public portion of their lives that manifest in the classroom are in keeping with that theology. That is the essence of religious liberty.I

Assistant Attorney General Eric Dreiband's team will personally appear to defend the Archdiocese of Indianapolis against an employment discrimination lawsuit brought by a teacher who was fired for openly flouting Catholic Church teaching on marriage.



I don't see where have any argument in this case.

 

[PoliticalChic]

Liberals wrote the Constitution

Not your breed of "liberal".

The post you refer to is a mirror image of the lying government school grads claiming that Obama gets credit for Trump's economy.

 

[PoliticalChic]

Liberals wrote the Constitution

Trump pisses on it

It is about freedoms. Not any form of system we have. No Federal taxation is part of it.

I'd be interested in you 'fleshing out' that post a bit more.

 

[yidnar]

1.Seems to be a strange question, as the Constitution is the ‘law of the land,’ meaning that all Americans live under the rules set forth by that document.

Shouldn’t the answer be…’both parties.’ If only that were the case.



2. As documented in a number of threads, there is no Far Right in America, but certainly is a Far Left, radicals who have taken over one of the parties….the Democrats. A reminder: To be "far," one's positions must be radical relative to that center. American traditions, values, and history represent that center. The Right, represented by the Republican Party, has no radial positions not consistent with America’s heritage…..but the Democrats sure do!

3. Subservient to the master they serve, the Democrat Party is now running on full-blown anti-white racism, socialism, infanticide, opposition to free speech, substituting illegal alien voters for the American citizenry, and anti-Semitism… the knuckle-dragging, atavistic pagan party.

Talk about “Far”!!!!



4. A glaring example, this week, is this Republican administration standing behind Americans and the first amendment.

“Unlike Eric Holder’s Justice Department, the Trump administration is on the forefront of defending First Amendment religious liberty. This Tuesday, Justice Department Civil Rights Division lawyers will be appearing in an Indiana state court to defend the religious freedom of Catholic schools.

The First Amendment protects the free exercise of religious beliefs. Churches have the First Amendment right to ensure that employees teaching children in church schools are espousing church theology and that the public portion of their lives that manifest in the classroom are in keeping with that theology. That is the essence of religious liberty.

Assistant Attorney General Eric Dreiband's team will personally appear to defend the Archdiocese of Indianapolis against an employment discrimination lawsuit brought by a teacher who was fired for openly flouting Catholic Church teaching on marriage.


Joshua Payne-Elliott, the former teacher at Cathedral High School and plaintiff, is suing because he was terminated from his employment as a high school teacher after openly defying church teaching on marriage and living as a married couple with another man.

When Payne-Elliott refused to modify his open opposition to Catholic teaching, he was fired from his teaching job at Cathedral High School in Indianapolis.”
Religious Liberty: Trump DOJ Defends Catholic School in State Court


They’ve got my “Amen!”

not to worry if the left ever get there way the idiots will come begging crawling on their weak knees for real Americans to repair their mistakes ...

 

[Staidhup]

In relationship to the 18th century definition of a “liberal” right winger is correct, however within the context of the 19th-21st century it would be incorrect. The conservative or free market proponents would be those wishing to preserve the original rights afforded, agreed upon, within the text of the Constitution and bill of rights. Those subscribing altering the document to meet their personal needs or aspirations would be classified a liberal.

 

[Penelope]

Liberals wrote the Constitution

Trump pisses on it

It is about freedoms. Not any form of system we have. No Federal taxation is part of it.

Perhaps ask a black person if you think you need more freedom!!

 

[PoliticalChic]

1.Seems to be a strange question, as the Constitution is the ‘law of the land,’ meaning that all Americans live under the rules set forth by that document.

Shouldn’t the answer be…’both parties.’ If only that were the case.



2. As documented in a number of threads, there is no Far Right in America, but certainly is a Far Left, radicals who have taken over one of the parties….the Democrats. A reminder: To be "far," one's positions must be radical relative to that center. American traditions, values, and history represent that center. The Right, represented by the Republican Party, has no radial positions not consistent with America’s heritage…..but the Democrats sure do!

3. Subservient to the master they serve, the Democrat Party is now running on full-blown anti-white racism, socialism, infanticide, opposition to free speech, substituting illegal alien voters for the American citizenry, and anti-Semitism… the knuckle-dragging, atavistic pagan party.

Talk about “Far”!!!!



4. A glaring example, this week, is this Republican administration standing behind Americans and the first amendment.

“Unlike Eric Holder’s Justice Department, the Trump administration is on the forefront of defending First Amendment religious liberty. This Tuesday, Justice Department Civil Rights Division lawyers will be appearing in an Indiana state court to defend the religious freedom of Catholic schools.

The First Amendment protects the free exercise of religious beliefs. Churches have the First Amendment right to ensure that employees teaching children in church schools are espousing church theology and that the public portion of their lives that manifest in the classroom are in keeping with that theology. That is the essence of religious liberty.

Assistant Attorney General Eric Dreiband's team will personally appear to defend the Archdiocese of Indianapolis against an employment discrimination lawsuit brought by a teacher who was fired for openly flouting Catholic Church teaching on marriage.


Joshua Payne-Elliott, the former teacher at Cathedral High School and plaintiff, is suing because he was terminated from his employment as a high school teacher after openly defying church teaching on marriage and living as a married couple with another man.

When Payne-Elliott refused to modify his open opposition to Catholic teaching, he was fired from his teaching job at Cathedral High School in Indianapolis.”
Religious Liberty: Trump DOJ Defends Catholic School in State Court


They’ve got my “Amen!”

not to worry if the left ever get there way the idiots will come begging crawling on their weak knees for real Americans to repair their mistakes ...

But it may be too late......

They'll be happy to take all of us down with them: they're nihilists.

 

[PoliticalChic]

In relationship to the 18th century definition of a “liberal” right winger is correct, however within the context of the 19th-21st century it would be incorrect. The conservative or free market proponents would be those wishing to preserve the original rights afforded, agreed upon, within the text of the Constitution and bill of rights. Those subscribing altering the document to meet their personal needs or aspirations would be classified a liberal.

He's not correct and neither are you unless you put 'classical' in front of 'liberal.'


The meaning of the word 'liberal' as used colloquially, is Socialist.

The Democrat debates should prove that to you.


"...[John] Dewey arguably did more than any other reformer to repackage progressive social theory in a way that obscured just how radically its principles departed from those of the American founding. Like Ely and many of his fellow progressive academics, Dewey initially embraced the term “socialism” to describe his social theory. Only after realizing how damaging the name was to the socialist cause did he, like other progressives, begin to avoid it. In the early 1930s, accordingly, Dewey begged the Socialist party, of which he was a longtime member, to change its name. “The greatest handicap from which special measures favored by the Socialists suffer,” Dewey declared, “is that they are advanced by the Socialist party as Socialism. The prejudice against the name may be a regrettable prejudice but its influence is so powerful that it is much more reasonable to imagine all but the most dogmatic Socialists joining a new party than to imagine any considerable part of the American people going over to them.” Dewey’s influential 1935 tract, Liberalism and Social Action, should be read in the light of this." The Refounding of America | National Review