Which is it democrats?

[Votto]

Which is it democrats?

1. The protests are mostly peaceful

2. Trump is responsible for the violent protests.

Your talking points conflict with one another.

 

[Oddball]

Yeah, I kinda pointed this out in my thread yesterday.

Just sayin'.

 

[Rye Catcher]

Which is it democrats?

1. The protests are mostly peaceful

2. Trump is responsible for the violent protests.

Your talking points conflict with one another.

Your effort to be logical is ludicrous.

 

[toobfreak]

Which is it democrats?

1. The protests are mostly peaceful

2. Trump is responsible for the violent protests.

Your talking points conflict with one another.

Relax. Democrats are pointing the way to the truth.

 

[toobfreak]

Which is it democrats?

1. The protests are mostly peaceful

2. Trump is responsible for the violent protests.

Your talking points conflict with one another.

Your effort to be logical is ludicrous.

Do you even know what logical is? What logical argument was Votto trying to make?

 

[danielpalos]

Which is it democrats?

1. The protests are mostly peaceful

2. Trump is responsible for the violent protests.

Your talking points conflict with one another.

There are good people on both sides.

 

[RealDave]

Which is it democrats?

1. The protests are mostly peaceful

2. Trump is responsible for the violent protests.

Your talking points conflict with one another.

Trump says we need to elect him to protect us from the violence that he can't protect us from now. What kind of stupid fuck is duped by that? You.

 

[Bob Blaylock]

Which is it democrats?

1. The protests are mostly peaceful

2. Trump is responsible for the violent protests.

Your talking points conflict with one another.

Doublethink - Wikipedia

To know and not to know, to be conscious of complete truthfulness while telling carefully constructed lies, to hold simultaneously two opinions which cancelled out, knowing them to be contradictory and believing in both of them, to use logic against logic, to repudiate morality while laying claim to it, to believe that democracy was impossible and that the Party was the guardian of democracy, to forget whatever it was necessary to forget, then to draw it back into memory again at the moment when it was needed, and then promptly to forget it again, and above all, to apply the same process to the process itself—that was the ultimate subtlety: consciously to induce unconsciousness, and then, once again, to become unconscious of the act of hypnosis you had just performed. Even to understand the word—doublethink—involved the use of doublethink.

The power of holding two contradictory beliefs in one's mind simultaneously, and accepting both of them... To tell deliberate lies while genuinely believing in them, to forget any fact that has become inconvenient, and then, when it becomes necessary again, to draw it back from oblivion for just as long as it is needed, to deny the existence of objective reality and all the while to take account of the reality which one denies—all this is indispensably necessary. Even in using the word doublethink it is necessary to exercise doublethink. For by using the word one admits that one is tampering with reality; by a fresh act of doublethink one erases this knowledge; and so on indefinitely, with the lie always one leap ahead of the truth.​

 

[Crepitus]

Which is it democrats?

1. The protests are mostly peaceful

2. Trump is responsible for the violent protests.

Your talking points conflict with one another.

"Mostly".

You need a better ESL teacher.

 

[Crepitus]

Which is it democrats?

1. The protests are mostly peaceful

2. Trump is responsible for the violent protests.

Your talking points conflict with one another.

Trump says we need to elect him to protect us from the violence that he can't protect us from now. What kind of stupid fuck is duped by that? You.

The OP.

 

[elektra]

there may be good people on the side of democrats, but they are either or stupid or ignorant

there is no place in this world for democrats

 

[XponentialChaos]

Those two statements aren't mutually exclusive.

 

[WTF19]

Which is it democrats?

1. The protests are mostly peaceful

2. Trump is responsible for the violent protests.

Your talking points conflict with one another.

Your effort to be logical is ludicrous.

how long did you think that answer out? must have been awhile

 

[WTF19]

Which is it democrats?

1. The protests are mostly peaceful

2. Trump is responsible for the violent protests.

Your talking points conflict with one another.

Trump says we need to elect him to protect us from the violence that he can't protect us from now. What kind of stupid fuck is duped by that? You.

no no no--he is talking about the vicious demoncrats---they need to be shot b4 they shoot us...DUH

 

[Votto]

Ok democrats, how about this one?

Which one is it?

 

[RealDave]

View attachment 383967

Ok democrats, how about this one?

Which one is it?

So, assfuck, you have no idea what a pandemic crisis is?