I don't give a damn about any conspiracy theory.
I am not interested in BELIEVING anything. BELIEVE means to accept something as true (or false) without sufficient evidence.
After seven years I no longer cared who did it.
The laws of physics do not give a damn about the United States or Islam or Christianity.
But skyscrapers must hold themselves up against gravity. That means the designers had to figure out how much steel to put where because the farther down you go the more weight a given level must support. So how can there be any kind of scientific investigation regardless of what destroyed the buildings without accurate information about the TONS of STEEL and TONS of CONCRETE that were on every level of the towers.
Try finding that discussed on the website for AE911Truth. I asked Richard Gage about that in Chicago in May of 2008. He said the NIST wasn't releasing accurate blue prints. Gage CLAIMS to be an architect. He CLAIMS to have engineers in his organization. How much has computing power increased since the WTC was designed in the early 60s. Has the way gravity works changed since then? They should be able to come up with some pretty close estimates from scratch. They know how many columns were where. It is not like they would have to design the buildings totally from scratch.
We are being handed bunch of crap from both sides of the issue. Strictly on the basis of Newtonian physics it should have been determined within SIX MONTHS whether or not airliners could do that IF WE HAD ACCURATE DATA on the towers.
So why aren't all of the so called EXPERTS demanding accurate data after NINE YEARS. Is it because they would have to explain not demanding it NINE YEARS AGO?
YouTube - Gravitational Collapse onto Cumulative Supports
This is the Piltdown Man Incident of the 21st century.
I am sick of all of the conspiracy theorists with their emotional bullshit.
psik