daveman
Diamond Member
You are way out of your league here, but carry on with your limited world view and I'll just sit back and laugh accordingly.

Or you can continue as you are. I bet the latter.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
You are way out of your league here, but carry on with your limited world view and I'll just sit back and laugh accordingly.
No, I did not.
so whats your explanation for the third skyscraper collapsing
You are way out of your league here, but carry on with your limited world view and I'll just sit back and laugh accordingly.You're wrong, kid. Time to grow up and accept it.
Or you can continue as you are. I bet the latter.
oh please do extrapolate on "the bigger picture"No, I did not.
so whats your explanation for the third skyscraper collapsing
I don't need an explanation. You're treating this like a crime scene, and judging this empirically, but in doing so you're also missing the bigger picture.
No, I did not.
so whats your explanation for the third skyscraper collapsing
I don't need an explanation. You're treating this like a crime scene, and judging this empirically, but in doing so you're also missing the bigger picture.
oh please do extrapolate on "the bigger picture"so whats your explanation for the third skyscraper collapsing
I don't need an explanation. You're treating this like a crime scene, and judging this empirically, but in doing so you're also missing the bigger picture.
Regardless a crime has been committed and the perpetrators need to be exposed..the truth needs to be told
First of all, you people would do well to realize the fact that Bin Laden plainly stated that he had no hand in 9-11. Furthermore, that incriminating video that was supposedly his admission was, obviously, a cleverly manufactured fake.
The only thing you do know is that 2 planes and no explosives brought down those 2 towers. To suggest otherwise is assinine.
To truly understand 9-11 you people should consider how U.S. foreign policy shapes the world we live in, with respect to the methods that are undertaken to maintain the dominance that that keeps the world from falling apart. With so much to be lost and yet so much to be gained it will become clearer to you the things people are capable of when so much is at stake.
You are way out of your league here, but carry on with your limited world view and I'll just sit back and laugh accordingly.You're wrong, kid. Time to grow up and accept it.
Or you can continue as you are. I bet the latter.
What is that you would like me to accept?
I don't give a damn about any conspiracy theory.
I am not interested in BELIEVING anything. BELIEVE means to accept something as true (or false) without sufficient evidence.
After seven years I no longer cared who did it.
The laws of physics do not give a damn about the United States or Islam or Christianity.
But skyscrapers must hold themselves up against gravity. That means the designers had to figure out how much steel to put where because the farther down you go the more weight a given level must support. So how can there be any kind of scientific investigation regardless of what destroyed the buildings without accurate information about the TONS of STEEL and TONS of CONCRETE that were on every level of the towers.
Try finding that discussed on the website for AE911Truth. I asked Richard Gage about that in Chicago in May of 2008. He said the NIST wasn't releasing accurate blue prints. Gage CLAIMS to be an architect. He CLAIMS to have engineers in his organization. How much has computing power increased since the WTC was designed in the early 60s. Has the way gravity works changed since then? They should be able to come up with some pretty close estimates from scratch. They know how many columns were where. It is not like they would have to design the buildings totally from scratch.
We are being handed bunch of crap from both sides of the issue. Strictly on the basis of Newtonian physics it should have been determined within SIX MONTHS whether or not airliners could do that IF WE HAD ACCURATE DATA on the towers.
So why aren't all of the so called EXPERTS demanding accurate data after NINE YEARS. Is it because they would have to explain not demanding it NINE YEARS AGO?
YouTube - Gravitational Collapse onto Cumulative Supports
This is the Piltdown Man Incident of the 21st century.
I am sick of all of the conspiracy theorists with their emotional bullshit.
psik
I don't see an option for what I consider the most likely theory.
Oh. My. Achin'. Pancreas.
Paper and washers? That's as retarded as the chicken wire and kerosene experiment.
Oh, wait, I forgot...you're the "expert" whose training consists solely of watching a building being built.
![]()
Oh. My. Achin'. Pancreas.
Paper and washers? That's as retarded as the chicken wire and kerosene experiment.
Oh, wait, I forgot...you're the "expert" whose training consists solely of watching a building being built.
![]()
And you think I give a damn about ridicule from morons.
Washers have mass. Therefore they have weight and inertia.
The paper loops provide as little support to the static load as I can devise. The kinetic energy of the falling mass is STOPPED by the inertia and the crush resistance of the supports.
Tell us what is stopping you from building a model that can be completely crushed by 12% of its own mass.
Haven't you heard there is a 10,000 Euro reward to anyone that can do it? Let's see you put your money where your mouth is.
The Heiwa Challenge
psik