Woodznutz
Diamond Member
- Dec 9, 2021
- 33,141
- 16,682
- 1,788
Using the map of the ancient middle east where was the most likely site for the construction of the ark?
Last edited:
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.

Arkansas. It's in the name!Using the map of the ancient middle east where was the most likely site for the construction of the ark?

Using the map of the ancient middle east where was the most likely site for the construction of the ark?
The ancient riverbeds of the Euphrates and the Tigris rivers have been discovered through satellite imagery and are pretty close to today's locations. I believe the ark was likely built in the region of ancient Babylon (modern Baghdad), where the two rivers are closest to each other. This was likely a center of trade, where materials for the ark from far and wide could be gathered as well as the workers and artisans needed.We have no way of knowing. There are no pre-flood maps of anywhere on the earth. The flood changed everything.
Quantrill
The ancient riverbeds of the Euphrates and the Tigris rivers have been discovered through satellite imagery and are pretty close to today's locations. I believe the ark was likely built in the region of ancient Babylon (modern Baghdad), where the two rivers are closest to each other. This was likely a center of trade, where materials for the ark from far and wide could be gathered as well as the workers and artisans needed.
Apparently moses wrote genesis. Isnt is weird how he knew all of these details, over a thousand years later?That 'ancient riverbed' takes us only as far back as the Flood of Noah. We are told that the Flood involved a terrible geographical disruption on the ocean floor. (Gen. 7:11) "In the six hundredth year of Noah's life, in the second month, the seventeenth day of the month, the same day were all the fountains of the great deep broken up..." And apparently this breakup continued for 150 days. (Gen. 7:24) "And the waters prevailed upon the earth an hundred and fifty days."
(Gen. 8:1-2) And God remembered Noah...the water asswaged; The fountains also of the deep and the windows of heaven were stopped..."
(Gen. 8:3) "And the waters returned from off the earth continually: and after the end of the hundred and fifty days the waters were abated."
I believe this drainage of this amount of water coupled with the already destruction of the breakup of the ocean floor, would have destroyed any resemblance of the ocean floor before the Flood.
Quantrill
Apparently moses wrote genesis. Isnt is weird how he knew all of these details, over a thousand years later?
I believe it was a slow-moving flood caused by a rising in the ocean floor. When the ocean floor settled back down the flood receded. However, I think the drainage patterns, the rivers, likely remained pretty much as before.That 'ancient riverbed' takes us only as far back as the Flood of Noah. We are told that the Flood involved a terrible geographical disruption on the ocean floor. (Gen. 7:11) "In the six hundredth year of Noah's life, in the second month, the seventeenth day of the month, the same day were all the fountains of the great deep broken up..." And apparently this breakup continued for 150 days. (Gen. 7:24) "And the waters prevailed upon the earth an hundred and fifty days."
(Gen. 8:1-2) And God remembered Noah...the water asswaged; The fountains also of the deep and the windows of heaven were stopped..."
(Gen. 8:3) "And the waters returned from off the earth continually: and after the end of the hundred and fifty days the waters were abated."
I believe this drainage of this amount of water coupled with the already destruction of the breakup of the ocean floor, would have destroyed any resemblance of the ocean floor before the Flood.
Quantrill
I believe it was a slow-moving flood caused by a rising in the ocean floor. When the ocean floor settled back down the flood receded. However, I think the drainage patterns, the rivers, likely remained pretty much as before.
Most believe the flood was so violent that it dramatically changed the surface of the earth. I don't believe that.
I think it came in and receded more or less the same speed as the tides. Some areas might erode badly but the flat lands wouldn't be changed much. We can study floodplains and tidal plains to get a good picture of flood dynamics. To my knowledge a good "Noah's Flood" model has never been constructed.Why?
Quantrill
I think it came in and receded more or less the same speed as the tides. Some areas might erode badly but the flat lands wouldn't be changed much. We can study floodplains and tidal plains to get a good picture of flood dynamics. To my knowledge a good "Noah's Flood" model has never been constructed.
We can speculate a lot based on the story.You have nothing to compare to the flood of Noah's day.
You can't reproduce the 'windows of heaven'. You can't reproduce the 'fouuntains of the deep'. You can't reproduce what it was before the Nohaic flood.
Quantrill
We can speculate a lot based on the story.
Its an allegory there never was an arkUsing the map of the ancient middle east where was the most likely site for the construction of the ark?