We are ~140 ppm away from extensive continental glaciation starting in the northern hemisphere and an eventual decrease of 8C. We are ~3100 ppm away from a super greenhouse state and an increase of 8C.That falls under either 1. or 2. Which do you advocate?5. a 3,000 meter sheet of ice covers all of Canada and parts of the US, Europe and Asia.But what if it is NOT a fraud and climate change turns out to be real? I see the options as:Why does the cause matter? If the ice sheet collapses it is a “Climate Emergency” in my book.What is that based on? We influence many natural things.The climate is natural too. Mankind hasn't got the power to increase the temperature of the globe.
We just don't.
But you don't specify what they are and YOU keep ignoring Post one, could it be because you have no answer to the Question.....
Where Is The “Climate Emergency”?
SATELLITE IMAGES REVEAL ICE SHELF PROTECTING ANTARCTIC GLACIER IS ON THE VERGE OF COLLAPSE
A critical Antarctic glacier is looking more vulnerable as satellite images show the ice shelf that blocks it from collapsing into the sea is breaking up much faster than before and spawning huge icebergs, a new study says. The Pine Island Glacier’s ice shelf loss accelerated in 2017, causing scientists to worry that with climate change the glacier’s collapse could happen quicker than the many centuries predicted. The floating ice shelf acts like a cork in a bottle for the fast-melting glacier and prevents its much larger ice mass from flowing into the ocean.
It is pathetic when your source ignores the active VOLCANO that is under part of the Pine Island glacier, similar with Thwaties glacier.
The ignorance and your shallow link is scary to behold since this was news a few years ago.....
Meanwhile still no climate emergency to show........
Because leftists are using the fraud of climate change to implement draconian wealth stealing laws to enrich the wealthy, and impoverish the middle class
Look up what it meant to be a serf in the middle ages, and then compare that to what it would be like to live under the green new deal.
Personally, I'm good with either 2 or 4, the lives of my children and grandchildren are worth a lot to me.
- Climate change is real and we do nothing: suffering and disaster on a global scale, including our heirs
- Climate change is real and we do everything reasonable to combat/mitigate it: suffering and disaster on a local scale (developed countries would be spared the worst of it)
- Climate change is fake or exaggerated and we do nothing: we played Russian Roulette with our children and won
- Climate change is fake or exaggerated and we do everything reasonable to combat/mitigate it: costly but insurance always is.
Everything you support brings the earth closer the an 8C decrease.
I advocate 600 ppm because the data shows at 600 ppm there is little risk of northern hemisphere glaciation.
Last edited: