Finally, an Unbiased and Objective Climate Science Report
- Thread starter Sunsettommy
- Start date
ReinyDays
Platinum Member
So you don't know and have no explanation ... c'mon now ... Jews are smarter than that ...
Sunsettommy
Diamond Member
- Mar 19, 2018
- 16,278
- 13,995
- 2,400
- Thread starter
- #283
Unchallenged? LOL The only people that think that are idiots like you.
Position Summary
Human-induced increases in greenhouse gasses, especially carbon dioxide (CO2), are the main drivers of recent global warming. Sound public policy and successful climate change mitigation and adaptation require scientifically validated assessment of current and future climate impacts.
This position statement (1) provides information for policy decisions that guide mitigation and adaptation strategies designed to address the current and future impacts of human-induced climate change; (2) summarizes the scientific basis for the consensus among earth scientists that human activities are the primary cause of recent global warming; (3) describes the significant effects on humans and ecosystems as greenhouse-gas concentrations and global climate change reach projected levels; and (4) recommends opportunities for GSA members to advance our understanding of climate change.
Conclusions and Recommendations
Climate Change - GSA Position Statement 10
www.geosociety.org
Society must undertake transformative action now to mitigate and adapt to the climate crisis
The Challenge
The global climate crisis, unequivocally driven by human activities that increase greenhouse gases (GHGs)i emissions, is proving increasingly costly and disruptive worldwide.
The responsibility for and impacts of the crisis are distributed unequally among different regions, populations, and sectors. To reduce loss of life, suffering and worsened inequities, faster and more comprehensive actions must be taken to mitigate the causes and adapt to the effects. Inclusive and strategic climate actions can increase the diversity of solutions, lead to greater equity, well-being, and security, and protect the human right to a healthy and sustainable environment.ii
The Evidence and Projections for Natural Systems
You apparently find the content of post one too difficult to handle as the science in it is beyond your alleged Geology training level to formulate a cogent reply, instead you run off to another place with an irrelevant cut and paste deflection attempt thus you failed yet again while being exposed as a fool in the process.
Post one CONTENT remains unchallenged thus still standing as it appears that the idea of reading it TERRIFIES warmest/alarmists thus they ignore it.
Old Rocks
Diamond Member
LOL Another MAGAt cannot find enough logic in their two brain cells to realize that that the policy statements of two of the world's leading geological Scientific Societies carry a bit more weight than that of some ass kissing cretins willing to prostitute their credentials for fossil fuel money. Here is another reaction to that piece of lying shit;
Sunsettommy
Diamond Member
- Mar 19, 2018
- 16,278
- 13,995
- 2,400
- Thread starter
- #285
Yet you once again provide no rebuttal at all to post one article what you posted is already addressed as a dishonest response which I have already read this was written by an Earth Science Professor,
Irrational Fear
DOE vs. the “Climate Expert Review”
Dr. Matthew Wielicki
Excerpt:
A group of academics released a rebuttal, Climate Experts’ Review of the DOE CWG Report. This isn't surprising… these are the same scientists who have long peddled the myth that CO2 is a "pollutant" akin to toxic waste, ignoring its essential role in life on Earth. Now, with their funding streams (often tied to grants that reward climate hysteria, including influences from agendas sponsored largely by entities like China, which benefits from Western deindustrialization) under threat from honest scrutiny like the DOE report, they're scrambling to save their asses.
Below, I show, in their own words, where that review undercuts itself, and where recent empirical papers flatly contradict their narrative.
What DOE actually says about extremes
DOE’s summary on extremes is short and clear:You can read that chapter yourself here: DOE Critical Review (PDF).
That conclusion aligns with the neutral record view I have presented for years (see my disaster trends explainer and the EM-DAT figure).
The review accuses DOE of bad method and cherry-picking:
It also claims DOE failed to do statistics on sea level acceleration and picked only a few gauges:
But pages earlier, the review leans on a rhetorical maneuver that weakens its own case:
That sentence concedes the core point: when the data are not significant, you do not have a detected trend. It is fine to speculate that changes might exist below detection, but that is not the same as evidence.
LINK
Sunsettommy
Diamond Member
- Mar 19, 2018
- 16,278
- 13,995
- 2,400
- Thread starter
- #286
Clintel
Clintel Foundation
Date: 29 August 2025
Excerpt:
Breaking: no acceleration in sea level rise detected worldwide
A new peer-reviewed study published in the Journal of Marine Science and Engineering challenges a key claim of climate science: that global sea level rise is accelerating. An analysis of more than 200 long-term tide gauge records shows no evidence of such acceleration, while IPCC models systematically overestimate local sea level rise.An analysis of more than 200 tide stations around the world shows that there is no evidence of a global acceleration in sea level rise. That is the surprising conclusion of the paper A Global Perspective on Local Sea Level Changes, published this week in the Journal of Marine Science and Engineering. It is a unique study by two Dutch researchers, Hessel Voortman and Rob de Vos.
The paper also shows that IPCC models significantly overestimate local sea level rise in 2020. This new publication is a follow-up to an earlier paper from 2023 in which first author Hessel Voortman demonstrated that sea level rise along the Dutch coast was not accelerating.
LINK
Toddsterpatriot
Diamond Member
EMH
Diamond Member
- Apr 5, 2021
- 30,223
- 17,822
- 2,788
usmcstinger
Gold Member
- Dec 31, 2011
- 1,443
- 484
- 200
The Poles showed the Russians what happens when they invade there air space!
usmcstinger
Gold Member
- Dec 31, 2011
- 1,443
- 484
- 200
Climate change was created by the left to control people. You can not change or create weather.
Woodznutz
Diamond Member
- Dec 9, 2021
- 33,164
- 16,700
- 1,788
I think the purpose of the efforts are to tweak it a little.
Or to stall or choke economic activity to halt population growth which in and of itself is idiotic logic because the data clearly shows that birth rates decline as living conditions improve.
EMH
Diamond Member
- Apr 5, 2021
- 30,223
- 17,822
- 2,788
The garbage positions you post harm opposition to AGW. It doesn't help it. You are a moron.
Yes you can cut and paste color fudge charts.
You cannot show us a PHOTO of "ocean rise" because there isn't any...
EMH
Diamond Member
- Apr 5, 2021
- 30,223
- 17,822
- 2,788
FUDGE is not data. Data comes from instruments. FUDGE is what all of your cut and paste color charts are...
FUDGE IS FRAUD.
EMH
Diamond Member
- Apr 5, 2021
- 30,223
- 17,822
- 2,788
You are CO2 FRAUD. And you have lost every debate with EMH, and you cannot refute one word EMH has posted...
EMH
Diamond Member
- Apr 5, 2021
- 30,223
- 17,822
- 2,788
A confession she cannot refute one word of it...
Similar threads
New Topics
-
The Republican Party is protecting Ilhan Omar from accountability- Started by YoursTruly
- Replies: 4
-
Fake Republicans Have Long History of Hiring Terrorists
- Started by merrill
- Replies: 0
-
-
Tony Gonzales drops out. Brandon Herrera (THE AK GUY) is very likely to go to WASHINGTON!- Started by ColonelAngus
- Replies: 11
-
Dem's State of the Union Guest an Illegal Immigrant Who May Have Been Sexually Assaulting Children- Started by Captain Creeper
- Replies: 6
