Finally, an Unbiased and Objective Climate Science Report

Climate always changes. Please show me on this graph where it didn't. I'll wait.

View attachment 1151004



That chart is actually from one ice core from Antarctica, and the "temperature" is "determined" by an oxygen isotope ratio... and it is near the tectonically and volcanically active Antarctic Peninsula. There is "A grade" data and then there is "D- grade," and that chart is in the D- category.
 
Me: It’s warming. The warming is caused by us. Warming is dangerous. We need to urgently transition to renewable energy to stop the warming. Once we do that, sea-level rise will stop and the weather won’t be so extreme.

And if you don't like what I said then tell Ms. Curry. She's the denialists' credible, verifiable source.
So you ignore all of my argument that you edited out and provide absolutely no verifiable credible source to back up your opinion because you can't.

Sometime you might actually stop parroting what they tell you to say and actually think about it?

Anybody who seriously thinks about it will wonder why nobody is answering those questions and then they maybe, just maybe might begin to see the value in wondering if all the AGW/climate change hype isn't likely all profit and/or politically motivated.

Some of us actually want the truth of these things and aren't satisfied with just repeating the assigned talking points. Most especially when honest answers will determine how much of our resources we are willing to be confiscated for that cause and how many of our liberties, options, choices, opportunities we are willing to sacrifice to it.
 
You my friend, we all could have trusted you as our expert on climate change, had you not tried to pull that stunt on the tide/water level at the big statue!

Were you misquoted? Is there anything you can say that will allow the denialists and me to trust you again?


You cannot refute anything EMH posts here on climate, not one...


 
That chart is actually from one ice core from Antarctica, and the "temperature" is "determined" by an oxygen isotope ratio... and it is near the tectonically and volcanically active Antarctic Peninsula. There is "A grade" data and then there is "D- grade," and that chart is in the D- category.
Did the temperature change just there?
 
Did the temperature change just there?


If there was a volcanic eruption nearby, it might spike the temps there while having a minimal overall effect on Earth temp. The volcanic gasses may also contort the data significantly. To claim that chart is "Earth temperature" is laughable.

During the past million years, Greenland froze while North America thawed. So if you measured temps on NA, they'd go way up, and AT THE SAME TIME temps on Greenland would go way down....
 
After 13 full pages, ZERO rebuttals to the CONTENT of post one article.

It must be galling for climate scammers to fail so spectacularly in trying so hard to prop up their scamming as reality that the weather and climate is nowhere a threat to our existence is sinking in as more and more warmest/alarmist morons go silent in forums and blogs the few hold out are so loony I have to wonder it is deliberate as people can't be THAT divorced from reality to be making utter fools of themselves to defend the indefensible.

I see that a particular warmest/alarmist have stopped visiting two forums due to the highly damaging rebuttals he gets from others who are far better informed and rational, here he comes in screams a torrent a few times then vanish comes back a week to ten days later to scream some more.
 
Last edited:
  • Thanks
Reactions: EMH
If there was a volcanic eruption nearby, it might spike the temps there while having a minimal overall effect on Earth temp. The volcanic gasses may also contort the data significantly. To claim that chart is "Earth temperature" is laughable.

During the past million years, Greenland froze while North America thawed. So if you measured temps on NA, they'd go way up, and AT THE SAME TIME temps on Greenland would go way down....
Volcanic eruptions at regular intervals. Neat trick.
 
If there was a volcanic eruption nearby, it might spike the temps there while having a minimal overall effect on Earth temp. The volcanic gasses may also contort the data significantly. To claim that chart is "Earth temperature" is laughable.

During the past million years, Greenland froze while North America thawed. So if you measured temps on NA, they'd go way up, and AT THE SAME TIME temps on Greenland would go way down....
Here is a graph using the last million years. You see a pattern here?

1755611705635.webp
 
You cannot refute anything EMH posts here on climate, not one...

Except that whole "reading a thermometer" problem ...

Which satellite band are you using as a proxy for 19th Century temperature readings? ... ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ... too funny ...
 
If there was a volcanic eruption nearby, it might spike the temps there while having a minimal overall effect on Earth temp. The volcanic gasses may also contort the data significantly. To claim that chart is "Earth temperature" is laughable.
Then how do we explain that sea levels have been rising ever since Mr. St. Helen erupted?

And what about Noah's big flood? Denialist that!!
 
Volcanic eruptions at regular intervals. Neat trick.


That apparently is the pattern for Yellowstone too. But it also is by far the most believable explanation. Alien spacecraft arrives and launches photon torpedo attack every 30k years is in 2nd place.
 
Then how do we explain that sea levels have been rising


You have no evidence of that. You have fudge charts and quotes from taxpayer funded liars. You cannot show one single photo of ocean rise, because.... there is no ocean rise...
 
Except that whole "reading a thermometer" problem ...

Which satellite band are you using as a proxy for 19th Century temperature readings? ... ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ... too funny ...


hahahah ah ha...


 
Here is a graph using the last million years. You see a pattern here?

View attachment 1151339


I do not accept that one ice core from one continent is a "global temperature." It is a VOSTOK temperature, if you trust "oxygen isotope ratios" where those who use that method CANNOT EXPLAIN WHAT VOLCANIC ERUPTIONS WOULD DO TO THAT RATIO...

and even with that, the variance is quite small, for a local reading. It definitely does not support CO2 FRAUD. It shows that nothing out of the ordinary is happening, no breakout.
 
15th post
You have no evidence of that. You have fudge charts and quotes from taxpayer funded liars. You cannot show one single photo of ocean rise, because.... there is no ocean rise...
You're just being plain silly again. You sort of blew it for yourself professor, when you forgot about the tides at the 'statue of freedom lost.'
 
I do not accept that one ice core from one continent is a "global temperature." It is a VOSTOK temperature, if you trust "oxygen isotope ratios" where those who use that method CANNOT EXPLAIN WHAT VOLCANIC ERUPTIONS WOULD DO TO THAT RATIO...

and even with that, the variance is quite small, for a local reading. It definitely does not support CO2 FRAUD. It shows that nothing out of the ordinary is happening, no breakout.
The graph shows ice cores from Greenland and ocean sediments.
 
You're just being plain silly again. You sort of blew it for yourself professor, when you forgot about the tides at the 'statue of freedom lost.'


LMFAO!!!

Every old photo showing no ocean rise was done at high tide, the CO2 FRAUD's best excuse....
 
Back
Top Bottom