Where did the cooling go?

[Rambunctious]

There are theories on both sides of the issue dummy...I don't just suck up things that plainly do not make sense....and man made global warming just doesn't make scientific sense...more and more scientists are moving in that direction....but you keep on believing your daily feed bag of nonsense...

Flat-earthers tell me the same thing.

You and they don't seem to realize that your feelings aren't science. The facts say you're wrong, so you're wrong.

Cultists like you don't even peek into the other side of the room...you are a believer that man is not a part of nature but an invader of it....you look at progress as the problem....basically you are an anti capitalist and a socialist....so American advancement and progress scares the shit out of you....so when someone that thinks as you do tells you man is destroying the planet you actually believe it without an ounce of skepticism....you are the problem not the answer....in ten years we will be laughing at people like you....

 

[martybegan]

OK, there was this cooling coming this winter. Where the hell did it go? This is not cooling.

In other news the chocolate ration is being increased from 30g to 20g.

1 day snapshot....

Ah, so more evidence would compel you?

Of course not.

What evidence?

 

[mamooth]

Cultists like you don't even peek into the other side of the room...

Totally wrong. The reason we know your science is dogshit is because we've studied your claims so very carefully. There's no conspiracy theory you can present here that I haven't seen and debunked many times before.

In stark contrast, you know zilch about the real science. All you're familiar with is the idiot political babble that you've been ordered to parrot.

you are a believer that man is not a part of nature but an invader of it....you look at progress as the problem....basically you are an anti capitalist and a socialist....

See? All we get from you is that kind of deranged and delusional political babbling. Your cult mind takes pride in how the purity of your thoughts is unsullied by any information not approved by the cult.

 

[martybegan]

1 day snapshot....

As usual, you missed the point.

Deniers always go by short-range local snapshots of their own backyard.

By presenting the whole world, Old Rocks pointed out how dumb and dishonest that was. Deniers just don't seem to comprehend the "global" part of "global warming",

It's interesting, how only deniers will look only at local forecasts. They always do the "it's cold here, so global warming is a hoax!" thing. In stark contrast, the smart and honest people here never do that. You never see us babbling "it was hot today at my house, so global warming is a fact!". That kind of dumb fallacy is only used by deniers.

No, i got Old Rocks doing his usual stupid AGW tricks.

If figures you and him are ****-buddies.

 

[mamooth]

What evidence?

Temperature data from things called "thermometers", to start with. Are you familiar with such newfangled gizmos?

 

[mamooth]

No, i got Old Rocks doing his usual stupid AGW tricks.

If figures you and him are ****-buddies.

Remember, cult boi, this isn't the politics folder, and the rules are different. In addition to your bitter weepy insults, you'll at least need to add some moron conspiracy babbling.

 

[CrusaderFrank]

OK, there was this cooling coming this winter. Where the hell did it go? This is not cooling.

^ Total bullshit

Here's the temperatures in the red hot Arctic

Arctic Weather Map

Gambell (N) 19F
Kotel (E) -4F
Nord (S) -8F
Sachs Harbod (W) 5F

 

[Rambunctious]

The reason we know your science is dogshit is because we've studied your claims so very carefully

No you haven't..anytime a scientist stands up and questions the carbon theory he or she is slammed....not debated...you don't debate the issue here...you just repeat bumper sticker slogans.....every prediction of doom fails to materialize....how many predicted dates do we have to pass without the predicted global destruction for you to see that you have been misled?....go back and look at what has been predicted by people that profit by this hoax....HI under water by 2018...the extinction of Polar Bears....the loss of west coast land....just how many times do you have to be lied to in order to question what you are being told?... the more time that goes by the sillier you alarmist sound....

 

[CrusaderFrank]

Here's the data set of the ocean temperatures from 1880 to 1920, including the heat trapped - like a rat - in the deep ocean:

End of data

 

[CrusaderFrank]

Cultists like you don't even peek into the other side of the room...

Totally wrong. The reason we know your science is dogshit is because we've studied your claims so very carefully. There's no conspiracy theory you can present here that I haven't seen and debunked many times before.

In stark contrast, you know zilch about the real science. All you're familiar with is the idiot political babble that you've been ordered to parrot.

you are a believer that man is not a part of nature but an invader of it....you look at progress as the problem....basically you are an anti capitalist and a socialist....

See? All we get from you is that kind of deranged and delusional political babbling. Your cult mind takes pride in how the purity of your thoughts is unsullied by any information not approved by the cult.

Please post the link between temperature increase and a CO2 increase from 280 to 400PPM.

Thank you

 

[martybegan]

What evidence?

Temperature data from things called "thermometers", to start with. Are you familiar with such newfangled gizmos?

So there were thermometers before the 1600's?

 

[martybegan]

No, i got Old Rocks doing his usual stupid AGW tricks.

If figures you and him are ****-buddies.

Remember, cult boi, this isn't the politics folder, and the rules are different. In addition to your bitter weepy insults, you'll at least need to add some moron conspiracy babbling.

I'm calling you a bullshitter. that covers most of your blathering.

And you went dirty off the bat, so please report me so we get banned together. Ill take a break and one for the team if it keeps your bullshit off the board.

 

[mamooth]

So there were thermometers before the 1600's?

There were proxies.

And as your cult didn't inform you of that, I understand that you had no way of knowing it.

 

[martybegan]

So there were thermometers before the 1600's?

There were proxies.

And as your cult didn't inform you of that, I understand that you had no way of knowing it.

Lol "proxies"

more ways to skew the data to suit your own interests.

Why don't you just ramble on about how many boot laces and razor blades Oceania has produced this quarter?

 

[CrusaderFrank]

So there were thermometers before the 1600's?

There were proxies.

And as your cult didn't inform you of that, I understand that you had no way of knowing it.

Can you please provide the proxies for the deep ocean temperature between say 1880 and 1920

How are you coming along showing the link between temperature and a 120PPM increase in CO2

 

[CrusaderFrank]

So there were thermometers before the 1600's?

There were proxies.

And as your cult didn't inform you of that, I understand that you had no way of knowing it.

Lol "proxies"

more ways to skew the data to suit your own interests.

Why don't you just ramble on about how many boot laces and razor blades Oceania has produced this quarter?

We can tell from this clam shell that washed up on the shores of Diego Garcia that the Pacific Ocean temperature in 1882 at a depth of 500m was 27F

 

[mamooth]

I'm calling you a bullshitter. that covers most of your blathering

Of course you are. You have to. It's not like you can ever address a point I make, so deflecgting with insults is your first option.

And you went dirty off the bat,

I'll make you a deal. If you stop babbling idiot conspiracy theories, I'll stop pointing it out. That way, your pwecious feewings won't be hurt so much.

so please report me so we get banned together.

You don't understand how this works. The rules are different in different forums. You can be a content-free insult slinger in the politics forum. You can't be that way in the enviro forum. You'll have to actually address some issues, which I know will be tough for you.

Ill take a break and one for the team if it keeps your bullshit off the board.

Going on a personal jihad against me rarely ends well. Such posters tend to self-destruct in a most amusing fashion. Also, admitting your intent out in the open here was probably not a good idea.

Now, let's discuss the point you evaded some more. Why is it you don't grasp the "global" part in "global warming"? Exactly what about the word "global" is causing you such confusion?

 

[CrusaderFrank]

I'm calling you a bullshitter. that covers most of your blathering

Of course you are. You have to. It's not like you can ever address a point I make, so deflecgting with insults is your first option.

And you went dirty off the bat,

I'll make you a deal. If you stop babbling idiot conspiracy theories, I'll stop pointing it out. That way, your pwecious feewings won't be hurt so much.

so please report me so we get banned together.

You don't understand how this works. The rules are different in different forums. You can be a content-free insult slinger in the politics forum. You can't be that way in the enviro forum. You'll have to actually address some issues, which I know will be tough for you.

Ill take a break and one for the team if it keeps your bullshit off the board.

Going on a personal jihad against me rarely ends well. Such posters tend to self-destruct in a most amusing fashion. Also, admitting your intent out in the open here was probably not a good idea.

Now, let's discuss the point you evaded some more. Why is it you don't grasp the "global" part in "global warming"? Exactly what about the word "global" is causing you such confusion?

Can you please provide the proxies for the deep ocean temperature between say 1880 and 1920. What? You can't?

How are you coming along showing the link between temperature and a 120PPM increase in CO2. You know, like real science.

 

[martybegan]

I'm calling you a bullshitter. that covers most of your blathering

Of course you are. You have to. It's not like you can ever address a point I make, so deflecgting with insults is your first option.

And you went dirty off the bat,

I'll make you a deal. If you stop babbling idiot conspiracy theories, I'll stop pointing it out. That way, your pwecious feewings won't be hurt so much.

so please report me so we get banned together.

You don't understand how this works. The rules are different in different forums. You can be a content-free insult slinger in the politics forum. You can't be that way in the enviro forum. You'll have to actually address some issues, which I know will be tough for you.

Ill take a break and one for the team if it keeps your bullshit off the board.

Going on a personal jihad against me rarely ends well. Such posters tend to self-destruct in a most amusing fashion. Also, admitting your intent out in the open here was probably not a good idea.

Now, let's discuss the point you evaded some more. Why is it you don't grasp the "global" part in "global warming"? Exactly what about the word "global" is causing you such confusion?

All you are doing is saying "fuh fuh fuh, conspiracy, fuh fuh fuh" any time someone posts something that goes against your AGW dogma. LOL, "content"

Bring it, ***** tits.

The bigger you make the models and the system, the more you can point to "adjusted" data to meet your desired results.

 

[CWayne]

What is all that warm water doing off of our West Coast clear up to Alaska?

LOL

Let me create a chart of ocean water that is 42 degrees. Then let us create this chart showing that the water temperature rose a whopping 0.5 degrees F.

We can then color the chart in oranges and reds for that increase and claim the world is on fire!