I'll try and inject a little perspective on the issue, just because the UN has indeed become quite predictable over time and it's voting record is not exactly a mystery once you look at the historical record.
Let's start with the nature of the UN itself. There are still the original five permanent security council members ruling upon every single "international law" which purcolates up from one of the multiple and selectively sponsored agencies which declare the law. The final veto from any of the five wield is the final word on the matter... and that's the end of it, period.
Many of your issues are passed from the agencies never once recognized by the USA or Isreal, and in fact shot down on the council, so I call that whole list:
In the mid-40's
only the most powerfull nation states in the world were granted permanent membership into the "Big Five" in the security council. France was a stretch, and in fact granted solely to get a majority UK/US vote against the communist states of USSR and China.
And before the UN becomes this holy international law, an American first lady created the whole concept. The whole point was to ensure everyone with the power to ensure peace in the world and prevent a new world war, could stay in constant contact and know exactly where each would stand on each issue.
And this whole brainstorm was in fact the idea of the the first lady Roosevelt herself, which after much hemming and hawing from Congress became a reality only becase the US funded and sponsored it.
Some 10 years after this structure was created, a resurgent Germany and Japan quickly matched the power of China, France, and eventually the UK.
At that stage of history each deserved equal consideration as primary nation states, who weilded actual global power and yet after one decade already failed recognition in this respect among the UN.
After 60 years of UN "international law" the only two instances in which law was enforced by any combined deployment of substance was:
The Korean war
(which two of five among the council chose to enforce even while their actions were opposed directly an in direct military engagement by both the USSR and China.)
Gulf war I
(which failed to accomplish an long term benefit except for those except the USSR and China, both choosing abstention but eventually gaining a major arms for oil trading partner.)
After more than 6 decades the UN security council structure is now dangerously based upon a fantasy.
Japan, India, and Germany do not sit on the permanent council, although for decades, their economies have exceeded four of the five permanent members.
China may be only now a #2 power but not after the U.S. includes Japan and Korea, both reliant completely upon the U.S. veto in the council but far more capable than China alone.
France is now the #8 wealthiest economy, while the USSR, now reduced to Russia itself, is #11 of all economies.
The states rotating through this highest UN authority never once included Isreal, even though it's power far exceed others who were.
http://www.globalpolicy.org/security/docs/italy3.htm
Italy protests their denial to the council, given Russia is far below their wealth, along with France. And Russia and France are almost weaker than Brazil. Certainly both weaker than Japan, India, Germany.
See???
In other words, let's talk about how unrealistic the UN actually is, before we get too excited about what kind of conclusions you can draw from it.
Lesser UN agencies are represented via a
one country-one vote process. Liberal Democracies as a whole are outnumbered.
Of all of those Liberal democracies those who would actually support Isreal instead of courting favour with the many oil rich and totalitarian Muslim states remain isolated to simply the US. We get to be sacrificed as the "bad guys" knowing full well we'll take all the blame while they, being France, China, and Russia, traditionally benefit for their support via monetary means. Knowing full well their appeasement will not risk their own interests as long as the US takes the ultimate risk and must prevent a defeat of Isreal and another Jewish massacre even though it impacts our own security and economic stability among these oil rich despots.